#1
|
|||
|
|||
Pontevedra
On 20/09/2018 05:39, Bret Cahill wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2...ars-pontevedra “How can it be that the elderly or children aren’t able to use the street because of cars?” asks César Mosquera, the city’s head of infrastructures. “How can it be that private property – the car – occupies the public space?” What's the problem with private property? We are all private property - our own. Possessions carried with us are our own property. That would certainly include the majority of bicycles, hire-schemes excepted (and keeping on topic). Why would the private property of some privileged people be acceptable and that of others unwelcome? Other than because of envy and spite, I mean. These are not questions likely to be answered adequately by a politician who is a member of the extremist left Galician Nationalist Bloc. |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Pontevedra
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2...ars-pontevedra
“How can it be that the elderly or children aren’t able to use the street because of cars?” asks César Mosquera, the city’s head of infrastructures. “How can it be that private property – the car – occupies the public space?” What's the problem with private property? Nothing as long as it stays on private property. When it's on public property the public decides the rules. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Pontevedra
On 9/20/18 6:41 PM, Bret Cahill wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2...ars-pontevedra “How can it be that the elderly or children aren’t able to use the street because of cars?” asks César Mosquera, the city’s head of infrastructures. “How can it be that private property – the car – occupies the public space?” What's the problem with private property? Nothing as long as it stays on private property. When it's on public property the public decides the rules. Because you're replying to somebody that can't do joined up writing, let alone joined up thinking, and far behind actually reading[1] the article. [1] I assume they still teach the basics in infant school. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Pontevedra
On 20/09/2018 17:41, Bret Cahill wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2...ars-pontevedra “How can it be that the elderly or children aren’t able to use the street because of cars?” asks César Mosquera, the city’s head of infrastructures. “How can it be that private property – the car – occupies the public space?” What's the problem with private property? Nothing as long as it stays on private property. Tht would mean that no-one can ever go anywhere, since everyone needs to take private property with them wherever they go. As an idea, it's not likely to be a runner. When it's on public property the public decides the rules. Indeed. They're all decided, aren't they? Even in Spain. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|