|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way
http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...or_ accident/ |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote:
Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal desire to cycle where they like. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. NB: only an arrogant and selfish tosser would take the side of the arrogant and selfish tosser who ran the toddler over... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On 17 nov, 11:16, ash wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote: On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_.... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal desire to cycle where they like. The proposition from the EU (and the law in a number of European countries such as Holland) has nothing to do with criminal responsibility nor even accountability. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On Nov 17, 10:25*am, Justin wrote:
On 17 nov, 11:16, ash wrote: On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote: On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed.. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal desire to cycle where they like. The proposition from the EU (and the law in a number of European countries such as Holland) has nothing to do with criminal responsibility nor even accountability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cyclists who as a group who are by far the biggest law breakers on the roads & pavements want others using these spaces around them to be presumed guilty until they can prove their innocence. How ridiculous is this mentality, which just goes to show how out of touch as a group they really are. All I can say is thank the stars that the far left is not in a position to push through these barmy and biased laws any more! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On 17 nov, 11:40, ash wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:25*am, Justin wrote: On 17 nov, 11:16, ash wrote: On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote: On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal desire to cycle where they like. The proposition from the EU (and the law in a number of European countries such as Holland) has nothing to do with criminal responsibility nor even accountability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cyclists who as a group who are by far the biggest law breakers on the roads & pavements want others using these spaces around them to be presumed guilty until they can prove their innocence. First, I take it you have statistics on your caim about lawbreaking (including speeding and using a telephone whilst at the wheel) which you will produce. Thanks. Second, as I have already said this proposed law has nothing at all to do with guilt and therefore your reference to what cyclists (in your opinion) want is redundant. How ridiculous is this mentality, which just goes to show how out of touch as a group they really are. All I can say is thank the stars that the far left is not in a position to push through these barmy and biased laws any more! Why would you equate moves towards safer roads as a far left position? The right wish to see more dangerous roads? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On Nov 17, 2:39*pm, Justin wrote:
On 17 nov, 11:40, ash wrote: On Nov 17, 10:25*am, Justin wrote: On 17 nov, 11:16, ash wrote: On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote: On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't.. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal desire to cycle where they like. The proposition from the EU (and the law in a number of European countries such as Holland) has nothing to do with criminal responsibility nor even accountability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cyclists who as a group who are by far the biggest law breakers on the roads & pavements want others using these spaces around them to be presumed guilty until they can prove their innocence. First, I take it you have statistics on your caim about lawbreaking (including speeding and using a telephone whilst at the wheel) which you will produce. Thanks. Second, as I have already said this proposed law has nothing at all to do with guilt and therefore your reference to what cyclists (in your opinion) want is redundant. How ridiculous is this mentality, which just goes to show how out of touch as a group they really are. All I can say is thank the stars that the far left is not in a position to push through these barmy and biased laws any more! Why would you equate moves towards safer roads as a far left position? The right wish to see more dangerous roads?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The far left jumped on the band wagon to 'out green' the other political parties. As cycling is viewed as a uber green mode and so became a favourite for public demonstrations of planet saving. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On 17 nov, 15:51, ash wrote:
On Nov 17, 2:39*pm, Justin wrote: On 17 nov, 11:40, ash wrote: On Nov 17, 10:25*am, Justin wrote: On 17 nov, 11:16, ash wrote: On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote: On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. Er Doug - a toddler cannot be held accountable for their actions due to them being below the age od criminal responsibility. They need protecting from those who should klnow better but insist on invading invade the safe environment of a pavement in their selfish and illegal desire to cycle where they like. The proposition from the EU (and the law in a number of European countries such as Holland) has nothing to do with criminal responsibility nor even accountability.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Cyclists who as a group who are by far the biggest law breakers on the roads & pavements want others using these spaces around them to be presumed guilty until they can prove their innocence. First, I take it you have statistics on your caim about lawbreaking (including speeding and using a telephone whilst at the wheel) which you will produce. Thanks. Second, as I have already said this proposed law has nothing at all to do with guilt and therefore your reference to what cyclists (in your opinion) want is redundant. How ridiculous is this mentality, which just goes to show how out of touch as a group they really are. All I can say is thank the stars that the far left is not in a position to push through these barmy and biased laws any more! Why would you equate moves towards safer roads as a far left position? The right wish to see more dangerous roads?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - The far left jumped on the band wagon to 'out green' the other political parties. As *cycling is viewed as a uber green mode and so became a favourite for public demonstrations of planet saving. That has nothing to do with the reversal of the burden of truth. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
about this:" the most vulnerable is the innocent one"
On Nov 17, 9:37*am, Doug wrote:
On Nov 17, 9:10*am, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Pavement cyclist blames toddler for getting in his way http://www.bournemouthecho.co.uk/new...er_as_cyclist_... I am glad you now agree that the most vulnerable should not be blamed. Obviously this same rule should also be applied to cyclists who are killed or injured by motorists, as the EU wanted to do but didn't. -- . UK Radical Campaigns. *http://www.zing.icom43.net A driving licence is a licence to kill. I think you mean, that the person who is blameworthy is to blame. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
:jg%e Innocent or Gullable? :jg%eo" | rogers | General | 0 | July 1st 08 06:22 PM |
"John "Cho" Gilmer keeps publishing his "Manifesto" over and over." | Hoodini | Racing | 0 | April 23rd 07 12:38 AM |
"What If Floyd Landis Were Innocent?" | MMan | Racing | 16 | August 18th 06 08:01 PM |
R.I.P. Jim Price (aka. "biker_billy", "sydney", "Boudreaux") | spin156 | Techniques | 15 | November 28th 05 07:21 PM |