|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
On Apr 7, 2:35*pm, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote: [snip] MMMMOOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN How many months in a winter there Scotty? Socks |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
"Bill Sornson" wrote You'll note, of course, that the GWAs (Global Warming Alarmists) don't take the sun into account at all in their so-called calculations and projections. And that makes Bill Sornson a LIAR. IPCC Climate Change 2001: Working Group I: The Scientific Basis Mann et al. (1998, 2000) used a multi-correlation technique and found significant correlations with solar and, less so, with the volcanic forcing over parts of the palaeo-record. The authors concluded that natural forcings have been important on decadal-to-century time-scales, but that the dramatic warming of the 20th century correlates best and very significantly with greenhouse gas forcing. The use of multiple correlations avoids the possibility of spuriously high correlations due to the common trend in the solar and temperature time-series (Laut and Gunderman, 1998). Attempts to estimate the contributions of natural and anthropogenic forcing to 20th century temperature evolution simultaneously are discussed in Section 12.4. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
And that makes Bill Sornson a LIAR. "Bill Sornson" wrote LOL Grow up, sonny. Well Billy, there are a couple here who have come to your defense and claimed that you aren't necessarily a LIAR, you might just be a MMMMOOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN So which is it John Boy? Are you a Liar or are you a Moron? Both perhaps. We await your decision. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
V-for-Vendicar wrote: Well Billy, there are a couple here who have come to your defense and claimed that you aren't necessarily a LIAR, you might just be a MMMMOOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN So which is it John Boy? Are you a Liar or are you a Moron? Both perhaps. We await your decision. "Bill Sornson" wrote I give. Your rapier wit and obvious knowledge on all matters meteorological are too much. You still haven't answered the question. If you don't decide, I will decide for you. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
On 2008-04-07, Dan wrote:
V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Bill Sornson" wrote You'll note, of course, that the GWAs (Global Warming Alarmists) don't take the sun into account at all in their so-called calculations and projections. And that makes Bill Sornson a LIAR. That doesn't make him a LIAR; he could JUST be ignorant... That happens to a lot of folks who get their science news from talk radio! Dan From a practical standpoint, there's very little difference between being a liar and being deliberately ignorant. There's no excusing anyone who uses (mis)information from talk radio, or even Faux News, in a discussion of public policy. There are too many better sources of information, though many of them require the use of exotic skills like "reading" and "thinking". Cheers, Wolf. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
Wolf Leverich wrote:
On 2008-04-07, Dan wrote: V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Bill Sornson" wrote You'll note, of course, that the GWAs (Global Warming Alarmists) don't take the sun into account at all in their so-called calculations and projections. And that makes Bill Sornson a LIAR. That doesn't make him a LIAR; he could JUST be ignorant... That happens to a lot of folks who get their science news from talk radio! Dan From a practical standpoint, there's very little difference between being a liar and being deliberately ignorant. There's no excusing anyone who uses (mis)information from talk radio, or even Faux News, in a discussion of public policy. There are too many better sources of information, though many of them require the use of exotic skills like "reading" and "thinking". We are discussing "Sorni" [1] here, no? Requesting that he thinks for himself may be a bit much. [1] Bill Sornson for the non-rec.bicycles.* regulars. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
Wolf Leverich wrote:
On 2008-04-07, Dan wrote: V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Bill Sornson" wrote You'll note, of course, that the GWAs (Global Warming Alarmists) don't take the sun into account at all in their so-called calculations and projections. And that makes Bill Sornson a LIAR. That doesn't make him a LIAR; he could JUST be ignorant... That happens to a lot of folks who get their science news from talk radio! Dan From a practical standpoint, there's very little difference between being a liar and being deliberately ignorant. There's no excusing anyone who uses (mis)information from talk radio, or even Faux News, in a discussion of public policy. There are too many better sources of information, though many of them require the use of exotic skills like "reading" and "thinking". Cheers, Wolf. Well, willfully ignorant is a problem. You may know this guy more than I do, probably do, in fact. However, not all people are trained in sciences, let alone biology or geology. A lot of the material IS hard to understand, and for the people who do not study it, counterintuitive. All these people HAVE is to be misled like sheep by talk radio... |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
Dan Nadan? wrote:
Wolf Leverich wrote: On 2008-04-07, Dan wrote: V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Bill Sornson" wrote You'll note, of course, that the GWAs (Global Warming Alarmists) don't take the sun into account at all in their so-called calculations and projections. And that makes Bill Sornson a LIAR. That doesn't make him a LIAR; he could JUST be ignorant... That happens to a lot of folks who get their science news from talk radio! Dan From a practical standpoint, there's very little difference between being a liar and being deliberately ignorant. There's no excusing anyone who uses (mis)information from talk radio, or even Faux News, in a discussion of public policy. There are too many better sources of information, though many of them require the use of exotic skills like "reading" and "thinking". Cheers, Wolf. Well, willfully ignorant is a problem. You may know this guy more than I do, probably do, in fact. Yes, we on rec.bicycles.* know Bill "Sorni" Sornson all too well. He has a few good one-liner quips, but is otherwise a tool of the right-wing media. However, not all people are trained in sciences, let alone biology or geology. A lot of the material IS hard to understand, and for the people who do not study it, counterintuitive. All these people HAVE is to be misled like sheep by talk radio... Some people hate science because they can not understand it. They generally turn to fundamentalism of one kind or another, ceding responsibility for thinking to someone else. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"DI" wrote How dare you to offer some proof. They won't accept it because they have their minds made up already. 2007 Tied for Earth's Second Warmest Year Andrea Thompson LiveScience Staff Writer January 16, 2008 The year 2007 has tied 1998 for the Earth's second warmest this century, NASA scientists announced today. OOPS, they, NASA recanted that study, they said their data was skewed. It was all over the news recently. Mike |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"Bill Sornson" wrote Stick your thermometer next to a generator or AC unit and you'll get high readings, too. But you won't get high bore hole temperatures, melting ice caps, high ocean temperatures, high satellite derrived temperatures, changes in the time of onset of the seasons, melting glaciers world wide, and alterations in the global weather patterns amongst other visible changes. And not realizing this makes you a MMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRROOOOONNNN Or a tool of the right-wing media. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Mountain Bikers' Alleged "Love of Nature" | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 53 | April 24th 08 02:52 PM |
PROOF that Mountain Bikers Aren't Out to "Enjoy Nature" | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 30 | April 17th 07 05:26 AM |
PROOF that Mountain Bikers Aren't Out to "Enjoy Nature" | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 29 | April 17th 07 05:26 AM |
Mountain bikers are out to "experience nature"? Not on your life! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 35 | October 12th 06 03:33 PM |
Mountain bikers are out to "experience nature"? Not on your life! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 34 | October 12th 06 03:33 PM |