|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
In aus.bicycle on Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:44:50 +1100
G-S wrote: Hmmm... *googles* Interesting. I have _never_ heard it used that way, but the dictionary supports you. Interesting.... It seems to be the major use now, eclipsing the original, and even eclipsing the more modern Christian version. (where the original was a very specific Christian version the current Christian version I think encompasses a wider variety of Christian.) At least I know why the OP called them 'fundamentalists' now though There's an interesting piece from Encounter about Fundamentalism and Terrorism which explores how some Fundamentalist types can end up seeing terrorism as a viable tool. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/encounter/s...06/1799384.htm Zebee |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
"Zebee Johnstone" wrote in message ... In aus.bicycle on Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:49:49 GMT PeteSig wrote: "Zebee Johnstone" wrote: Umm... cos they have taken a couple of simple ideas and made them the core and totality of their religion, and refuse to see there can be any other interpretation? And they think anyone who disagrees in any way is evil and unclean and has nasty motives? Have you actually taken part in any Critical Mass rides? I won't take part *because* of the results. WHich I couldn't change but would only reinforce. Uhuh. So we judge the attitudes of the people involved, without experiencing their actions nor talking to them to see where they are coming from. Not much more sophisicated then Alan Jones' comments on those 'lebanese yoof 'at Cronulla really. Try to go on a Critical Mass ride, Zebee, at least once, and talk to the cyclists involved. You may be surprised that they're not too different to you. Some have extreme views and are very self-opinionated. Aren't we all at aone time or another? A lot of the errant behaviour actually gets weeded out by the more moderate approach of the long-term riders. really? Then how come those who see it don't see that? What do the moderates do, how can they change what the image is? People who get unjustifiably aggro with motorist get a good talking to. (and isn't it interesting that when there's trouble CM say "no one is in control" but then people say there is control.... Peer pressure is also known as the madness of crowds...) Peer pressure is what controls society *all* the time. Our legal system is just a codified form of peer pressure. Instead I ride sensibly on the road to work. And you know... I don't get run off the road. I get about as many incidents as I get when driving a car or riding a motorcycle. As I do too. But then I ride in Melbourne's eastern suburbs. I gather the northern suburbs are a bit different. Far more testosterone-laden boys in their 'fully sick' hotted Commodores But you know when I talk to people about CM do I get "oh, I should be more careful of bicycles"? Like hell I do. Instead I get told cyclists are immature selfish ******s who get all this money spent on them and then clog up the roads. This attitude will pervade, regardless of Critical Mass. CM is actually more of a wake up to many drivers. Especially those who try to crash through the ride, and get a stern reminder of their road responsibilities by the Police. You ask anyone who *isn't* a cyclist about CM. If they know it, they'll dis it, if they don't and you tell them what happens, they'll dis it. So, this helps how? See above. Motorists bad-mouthed me as soon as I began commuting. Pre-CM, 1975, and first-off it was my own father. Grrrr! Many Critical Mass riders also own and use a car at certain times too! So? I haven't owned a car for 20 years. It isn't relevant. Fairly relevant when some people paint CM riders as extreme, fundamentalist nutcases. Fundamentalist? Me?? Suburban home, wife, two kids, cat, two cars (I know!!) nine bikes in running condition :0 Don't think I'm an extremist nut who won't listen to another viewpoint. We all come from diverse Aussie backgrounds, but share a passion for cycling. Does not make someone a 'fundamentalist'. -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
Vintage wrote:
All I see is angry motorists and how that actually helps the cause and changes their views I don't know. Giving into bullies never solves anythings. We as a whole are much better off just thanking drivers that do the right thing etc when out on the road and trying that way. Yep, that has work very well for the last 30+ years.Just look at all those bicycle riders murdered by car drivers. They are all lining up to agree with you. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
Harry 'Snapper' Organ wrote:
I see that Critical Mass continues to set the image of cycling back with its acts of mass stupidity. Nope,crititcal mass is simply doing what is legal. It is constable plod that insists on turning it into a three ring circus every month. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
On 2007-12-01, PeteSig (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: "Vintage" wrote: All I see is angry motorists and how that actually helps the cause and changes their views I don't know. Just to confirm your level of experience, how many Critical Mass rides have you been on? (As an actual participant) Because, having been on a few in Melbourne, my experience is that the numbers of motorists expressing support for CM is actually quite high, at least as many as those who honk the horn agressively. Far higher was my experience. I may be remembering incorrectly, but the horns were rather infrequent. And maybe one angry young man in a mercedes, per ride. The smiling drivers and passengers were everywhere. I'm wondering if that is because for most people, they didn't actually feel they were being delayed at all. We're out of there and their memories in 10 minutes, tops. The gridlock is no different to what it was yesterday, last week, or last month. One striking example of this was near MCG one day, where the cars were stationary at a clogged intersection, all ways. We saw from a distance that they were not moving for 20 minutes -- not a single car. We just moved through the intersection on the green, and were out of there, leaving the clogginess behind. We as a whole are much better off just thanking drivers that do the right thing etc when out on the road and trying that way. Anyone that lets me go by, stops for me etc always gets a smile and thank you gesture. Hey, great. This is actually what Critical Mass riders do while on the ride. Revolutionary, huh? Lots of cheering and smiliness Plenty of sacasticness too, but plenty of genuine friendliness to counteract that. Haven't been on a Sydney CM though. -- TimC The stereotypical Islay is like chewing on a well-preserved rowing boat, spiced up with seaweed, whereas the 20yo Laddie is more like relishing a gourmet meal in said rowing boat. -- Ingvar in ASR |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
I won't take part *because* of the results. WHich I couldn't change but would only reinforce. So you have never attempted and never will attemp a meaningful relationship with any one ? Same logic. Some have extreme views and are very self-opinionated. Aren't we all at aone time or another? A lot of the errant behaviour actually gets weeded out by the more moderate approach of the long-term riders. really? Then how come those who see it don't see that? Because they don't want to. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
"Terryc" wrote: Harry 'Snapper' Organ wrote: I see that Critical Mass continues to set the image of cycling back with its acts of mass stupidity. Nope,crititcal mass is simply doing what is legal. It is constable plod that insists on turning it into a three ring circus every month. Actually in Melbourne the Police bile squad and motorbikes are generally very supportive. They work to make sure the ride proceeds smoothly, but spend more time sorting out misguided motorists who seem to think their 'urgent meeting' gives them a right to run down cyclists. Very few cyclists are so out of line that they need prosecuting. Neil Bitchell does far more to make it a three ring circus. -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
On 2007-12-01, PeteSig (aka Bruce)
was almost, but not quite, entirely unlike tea: "Terryc" wrote: Harry 'Snapper' Organ wrote: I see that Critical Mass continues to set the image of cycling back with its acts of mass stupidity. Nope,crititcal mass is simply doing what is legal. It is constable plod that insists on turning it into a three ring circus every month. Actually in Melbourne the Police bile squad and motorbikes are generally very supportive. They work to make sure the ride proceeds smoothly, but spend more time sorting out misguided motorists who seem to think their 'urgent meeting' gives them a right to run down cyclists. I had lunch at a cafe just then, sitting outside under the verandah watching the intersection of Burwood and Glenferrie. Lots of seriously dodgy driving. One old but very important looking guy, obviously in a bit of a hurry, was a little annoyed that someone had stopped in front of him in the left turning lane for the quite clearly red light, as a car coming the other way was completing their right hand manevour into the same road. So his horn went off for a first time. The car in front, a little spooked by the frustrated guy behind, hurried on along behind the guy completing his turn from the opposite direction, getting a little close for comfort. The red has now been like this for about 4 seconds. Guy behind now rushes through to start his turn, and does some dodgy maneuvering to avoid the cars now travelling directly for him. Incidentally, at that intersection, I saw something scary about every 100 cars. Lets say that someone who does something that scary, once every tenth intersection they pass through, should never have been allowed behind the wheel of a training vehicle. That means one in every 10 cars are driven by a driver who should not be allowed to drive because they are going to create a dangerous situation every 10th intersection they pass through. That, or one in every 100 drivers creates a dangerous hazard *every* intersection they pass through, but in practice, I tend to see an individual driver do something stupid once, then don't repeat that again for a while, so I suspect it's more people being stupid less often. Very few cyclists are so out of line that they need prosecuting. Annoyingly though, the police stop passage of trams behind us when we have all explicitly stopped in the left lane frantically waving them through. The tram passengers have more right than us to pass through the city unimpeded, because the density of people inside a tram (140, apparently) is higher than the density of a pack of cyclists (1000 of us stretch about a km in 1.5 lanes on Brunswick/Johnson St), and we readily recognise that! -- TimC TELESCOPE, n. A device having a relation to the eye similar to that of the telephone to the ear, enabling distant objects to plague us with a multitude of needless details. Luckily it is unprovided with a bell summoning us to the sacrifice. -- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary" |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
Zebee Johnstone wrote:
In aus.bicycle on Sat, 01 Dec 2007 12:44:50 +1100 G-S wrote: Hmmm... *googles* Interesting. I have _never_ heard it used that way, but the dictionary supports you. Interesting.... It seems to be the major use now, eclipsing the original, and even eclipsing the more modern Christian version. I live in a country town though... and language use tends to lag a couple of decades behind the big cities (where the original was a very specific Christian version the current Christian version I think encompasses a wider variety of Christian.) At least I know why the OP called them 'fundamentalists' now though There's an interesting piece from Encounter about Fundamentalism and Terrorism which explores how some Fundamentalist types can end up seeing terrorism as a viable tool. http://www.abc.net.au/rn/encounter/s...06/1799384.htm *bookmarks for later when he's got time* G-S |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Critical Mass - Fundamentalist Plonkers?
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Police win powers to control Critical Mass cycle rally - FW: Don't be taken for a ride: Critical Mass has NOT been banned | Fod | UK | 2 | May 27th 07 03:06 PM |
Critical Mass = Critical ASS | Jan Mobely | Social Issues | 0 | July 12th 05 07:09 PM |
[critical-mass] Promote Critical Mass in NYC This Friday! | Jym Dyer | Social Issues | 3 | March 26th 05 09:14 PM |
Critical Mass mass arrests. | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 24 | September 2nd 04 09:22 PM |
Critical Mass on a uni? | onewheeldave | Unicycling | 13 | February 14th 04 11:21 PM |