Cyclists offending against Gaia

On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago, because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

DUI

On 11/28/2016 9:11 AM, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago, because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

Yea but you are wasting a bunch of resources by having a bicycle, you know.
You don't really need that "thing" and if you weren't a hypocrite you
would just walk everywhere.
Think of all the precious resources you could have saved (for whoever?)
and all the exercise you could have gotten (that you don't want)...

"If you brag about your glass house, it will tend to collect rocks"

On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 7:11:39 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago, because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

Hey: Cars let get you there without sweating, and chicks dig back seats.

On 11/28/2016 6:42 PM, DougC wrote:
On 11/28/2016 9:11 AM, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had
a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago,
because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog
wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something
delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more
likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy
who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the
vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time
tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the
exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the
environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just
like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated
with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

Yea but you are wasting a bunch of resources by having a bicycle, you know.
You don't really need that "thing" and if you weren't a hypocrite you
would just walk everywhere.
Think of all the precious resources you could have saved (for whoever?)
and all the exercise you could have gotten (that you don't want)...

"If you brag about your glass house, it will tend to collect rocks"

Remember that Jute brags about using an electric moped, not a real bicycle.

--
- Frank Krygowski

AJ had a bypass from a beltway giving him Brandt's disease.

I heard oF a gyroscope implant.

On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 12:02:27 AM UTC, Doug Landau wrote:
On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 7:11:39 AM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago, because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

Hey: Cars let get you there without sweating, and chicks dig back seats.

And the prize for the best reason for keeping a car goes to...

Andre Jute
LOL

On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 3:15:56 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/28/2016 6:42 PM, DougC wrote:
On 11/28/2016 9:11 AM, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had
a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago,
because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog
wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something
delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more
likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy
who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the
vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time
tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the
exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the
environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just
like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated
with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

Yea but you are wasting a bunch of resources by having a bicycle, you know.
You don't really need that "thing" and if you weren't a hypocrite you
would just walk everywhere.
Think of all the precious resources you could have saved (for whoever?)
and all the exercise you could have gotten (that you don't want)...

"If you brag about your glass house, it will tend to collect rocks"

Remember that Jute brags about using an electric moped, not a real bicycle.

--
- Frank Krygowski

Remember that Krygowski brags about knowing everything, even when he knows nothing.

Do you also lie about being a pompous asshole, Franki-boy?

Andre Jute
Zero tolerance for the enemies of society

On 11-28-2016 17:42, DougC wrote:
Yea but you are wasting a bunch of resources by having a bicycle, you know.
You don't really need that "thing" and if you weren't a hypocrite you
would just walk everywhere.
Think of all the precious resources you could have saved (for whoever?)
and all the exercise you could have gotten (that you don't want)...

"If it weren't for that blasted backhoe,
a hundred of us would have jobs with our shovels."

"Yeah, and if it weren't for those blasted shovels,
ten thousand of us could have jobs with our spoons."

--
Wes Groleau

On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 9:45:17 PM UTC-8, Andre Jute wrote:
On Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 3:15:56 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/28/2016 6:42 PM, DougC wrote:
On 11/28/2016 9:11 AM, Andre Jute wrote:
On Saturday, November 26, 2016 at 4:59:10 AM UTC, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 11/25/2016 10:48 PM, David Scheidt wrote:
Joy Beeson wrote:
:On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 07:52:12 +0700, John B Slocomb
wrote:

: The "average Usian
: family has 1.9 automobiles. A simple reduction of cars to one per
: family would significantly reduce both Usian family debt and carbon
: emission.

:If we got rid of one of our two gasoline-powered road vehicles, carbon
:emissions would *increase*: we can do car jobs with the truck, but we
:can't do truck jobs with the car, so it would be the car that had to
:go even though the truck spends much more time sitting idle.

Or you'd adjust, and realize the 'truck jobs', whatever they are,
could be outsourced to someone with a truck, either including their
labor or by renting one.

I've found that a small car towing a small utility trailer can handle
almost any "truck job."


--
- Frank Krygowski

Christ, there's a bunch of hypocrites on this newsgroup. I haven't had
a car since I sold our last estate car in 1992, a quarter-century ago,
because it was growing moss just standing there like a big old dog
wanting to be taken walkies. We walk, I cycle, if I want something
delivered, I call the taxi service, if I need to go somewhere (or more
likely have people picked up at the airport) I call the limousine guy
who has a nice Rolls, and anything large I want is dropped off by the
vendor. It's actually more convenient, and less of a waste of time
tending to the beasts, not to have a car at all. Best of all, the
exercise keeps me alive.

I'd call myself an environmentalist, except I find the
environmentalists so determinedly ignorant, and faith-driven, just
like the religious fundamentalists, I'm embarrassed to be associated
with you.

Now listen to the worthless excuses for keeping a car -- or several.

Andre Jute
Conservationist. I practice what I preach.

Yea but you are wasting a bunch of resources by having a bicycle, you know.
You don't really need that "thing" and if you weren't a hypocrite you
would just walk everywhere.
Think of all the precious resources you could have saved (for whoever?)
and all the exercise you could have gotten (that you don't want)...

"If you brag about your glass house, it will tend to collect rocks"

Remember that Jute brags about using an electric moped, not a real bicycle.

--
- Frank Krygowski

Remember that Krygowski brags about knowing everything, even when he knows nothing.

Do you also lie about being a pompous asshole, Franki-boy?

Andre Jute
Zero tolerance for the enemies of society

Actually Frank is an intelligent and knowledgeable person. The problem is that he doesn't know what he doesn't know. And maybe we all have that disease.