|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
Does any major manufacturer still makes non-compact frame road bikes for
sale in the U.S.? Friend is looking for a new road bike and is about to give up on shops and go to bikesdirect.com. He's willing to spend about $2K, which rules out all the custom frames which are still normal size. He needs a 56cm frame. There are still a couple of touring bikes made in non-compact frame designs, but he wants something lighter (the touring bikes are all steel frames and the wheels are heavier as well). |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
Op 27-4-2012 17:31, SMS schreef:
Does any major manufacturer still makes non-compact frame road bikes for sale in the U.S.? Friend is looking for a new road bike and is about to give up on shops and go to bikesdirect.com. He's willing to spend about $2K, which rules out all the custom frames which are still normal size. He needs a 56cm frame. There are still a couple of touring bikes made in non-compact frame designs, but he wants something lighter (the touring bikes are all steel frames and the wheels are heavier as well). Tell him that there is nothing wrong with a slightly sloping toptube. Longer headtube, more comfortable position possible without an ugly stack of spacers etc. Lou |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
Lou Holtman wrote:
Op 27-4-2012 17:31, SMS schreef: Does any major manufacturer still makes non-compact frame road bikes for sale in the U.S.? Friend is looking for a new road bike and is about to give up on shops and go to bikesdirect.com. He's willing to spend about $2K, which rules out all the custom frames which are still normal size. He needs a 56cm frame. There are still a couple of touring bikes made in non-compact frame designs, but he wants something lighter (the touring bikes are all steel frames and the wheels are heavier as well). Tell him that there is nothing wrong with a slightly sloping toptube. Longer headtube, more comfortable position possible without an ugly stack of spacers etc. Lou That's true but if one prefers a level top tube there are well priced good quality Italian built Torelli Corsa frames: http://torelli.com/frames/torelli/st...sa-strada.html -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
Op 27-4-2012 18:10, AMuzi schreef:
Lou Holtman wrote: Op 27-4-2012 17:31, SMS schreef: Does any major manufacturer still makes non-compact frame road bikes for sale in the U.S.? Friend is looking for a new road bike and is about to give up on shops and go to bikesdirect.com. He's willing to spend about $2K, which rules out all the custom frames which are still normal size. He needs a 56cm frame. There are still a couple of touring bikes made in non-compact frame designs, but he wants something lighter (the touring bikes are all steel frames and the wheels are heavier as well). Tell him that there is nothing wrong with a slightly sloping toptube. Longer headtube, more comfortable position possible without an ugly stack of spacers etc. Lou That's true but if one prefers a level top tube there are well priced good quality Italian built Torelli Corsa frames: http://torelli.com/frames/torelli/st...sa-strada.html Still steel, but indeed a level toptube and a decent headtube lenght. Lou |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
On 4/27/2012 9:10 AM, AMuzi wrote:
That's true but if one prefers a level top tube there are well priced good quality Italian built Torelli Corsa frames: He wants to buy a complete bicycle, not begin a project. The negatives of the compact frame geometry are too great for him personally, but lets not turn this thread into a debate over the relative merits of each geometry. Suffice it to say that "a level top tube" is not the issue with compact geometry. I told him to go with a Habanero titanium with Shimano 105. They sell complete bicycles as well as just frames. Maybe he'll do it, since it's much better than what he can get at bikesdirect, and he's pretty much resigned to the fact that he can't buy what he wants at an LBS anymore anyway, so whatever he gets it will have to be ordered from somewhere. He can come in at around $2100 for a complete bike, less pedals. He also absolutely does not want a carbon fork, not just because of the large number of carbon fork failures and recalls, but for other reasons as well. With the Habanero he can get it built with a non-carbon fork. I also suggested the Surly Pacer, but he wants a triple crankset, and isn't sold on CroMo like I am. But even with changing the crankset it's still a lot less than a Habanero. At least the Surly is available at an LBS. About 24 pounds which is a few pounds more than a Habanero complete bike, but this is not really a big deal for him. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
In article , SMS wrote:
I told him to go with a Habanero titanium with Shimano 105. Habanero is the obvious choice, and one can still purchase them without the arguably-silly threadless headsets. Mine will be ten years old in a few weeks and has performed well, including a couple million feet of climbing. It has proven to be a good value. Art |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
On 4/27/2012 9:48 AM, Arthur Shapiro wrote:
In , wrote: I told him to go with a Habanero titanium with Shimano 105. Habanero is the obvious choice, and one can still purchase them without the arguably-silly threadless headsets. That's true, but since the threaded forks and headsets have become almost a boutique item, it now costs more for threaded. A threaded headset and fork are preferable of course, but I don't think he'd pay two hundred dollars more for it. You can correct the biggest problem with threadless headsets with some after-market devices, i.e. see http://www.octagoncycles.com/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oQYbZeQW0M. For his riding, the Surly Pacer would be ideal, and still about $600 less than the Habanero even once he had the crankset changed to a triple. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
On 04/27/2012 01:08 PM, SMS wrote:
On 4/27/2012 9:48 AM, Arthur Shapiro wrote: In , wrote: I told him to go with a Habanero titanium with Shimano 105. Habanero is the obvious choice, and one can still purchase them without the arguably-silly threadless headsets. That's true, but since the threaded forks and headsets have become almost a boutique item, it now costs more for threaded. A threaded headset and fork are preferable of course, but I don't think he'd pay two hundred dollars more for it. You can correct the biggest problem with threadless headsets with some after-market devices, i.e. see http://www.octagoncycles.com/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oQYbZeQW0M. For his riding, the Surly Pacer would be ideal, and still about $600 less than the Habanero even once he had the crankset changed to a triple. I believe that the Bianchi CRO-Moly bikes are still non-compact frames. http://www.bianchiusa.com/bikes/road/ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
On 4/27/2012 12:04 PM, Duane wrote:
On 04/27/2012 01:08 PM, SMS wrote: On 4/27/2012 9:48 AM, Arthur Shapiro wrote: In , wrote: I told him to go with a Habanero titanium with Shimano 105. Habanero is the obvious choice, and one can still purchase them without the arguably-silly threadless headsets. That's true, but since the threaded forks and headsets have become almost a boutique item, it now costs more for threaded. A threaded headset and fork are preferable of course, but I don't think he'd pay two hundred dollars more for it. You can correct the biggest problem with threadless headsets with some after-market devices, i.e. see http://www.octagoncycles.com/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oQYbZeQW0M. For his riding, the Surly Pacer would be ideal, and still about $600 less than the Habanero even once he had the crankset changed to a triple. I believe that the Bianchi CRO-Moly bikes are still non-compact frames. http://www.bianchiusa.com/bikes/road/ They've wrecked those too. Not quite compact, but "modified." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Who still makes non-compact frame road bikes?
On Apr 27, 12:08*pm, SMS wrote:
On 4/27/2012 9:48 AM, Arthur Shapiro wrote: In , *wrote: I told him to go with a Habanero titanium with Shimano 105. Habanero is the obvious choice, and one can still purchase them without the arguably-silly threadless headsets. That's true, but since the threaded forks and headsets have become almost a boutique item, it now costs more for threaded. A threaded headset and fork are preferable of course, but I don't think he'd pay two hundred dollars more for it. You can correct the biggest problem with threadless headsets with some after-market devices, i.e. see http://www.octagoncycles.com/ and http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6oQYbZeQW0M. For his riding, the Surly Pacer would be ideal, and still about $600 less than the Habanero even once he had the crankset changed to a triple. Hmmm, "arguably silly threadless headsets..." Ooooookay. No need to dispute but there's a reaction that can just be left alone except that I feel better now g. Oh hell: I really like having a "faceplate" stem, only common amongst "threadless" so far as I know, both for the admittedly rare need to remove the bars (at least at my house), but more for the secure and creak-free cycling I've experienced since 86'ing the quill stems on 3 of 4 bikes in my "fleet". What's not to like about a stronger steerer tube (no threads to bulge while the too-tight stem still can be twisted off-center), easy adjustment with a single cheap, small tool? If you want to talk about looks--? Well, I agree but "I got over that", because to me the functioning is so much better. OK, lay it on me! ======================== I'm not a "market expert" by any means but two points I'd like to raise: 1) Ti makes a fine, no-maintenance bike frame in "matte" finish, which was a selling point that was well explained the last time I read the Habanero site, and is borne out in my experience of owning a matte- finish Ti bike-- "you just wash it every once in a while" and it looks the same, after; 2) Custom sizing was a feature at Habanero, IMS. This, if you'll excuse me, would be a great time to get some kind of measurements taken and see *if* a custom-sized frame might be in order. If you're going to spend money on a new bike, and you can well use custom sizing, that's a great thing to spend the money on and even save up a little longer if that's what it takes (opinion and stated as such). Said as a "long top-tube guy" whose ex was another "needs a custom fit" rider; she said "First time I've been comfortable on a bike" and for the non-believers, "I bet you can ride stock" g. 3) Back to "market", and this will be three, three points I'd like to raise, but Habanero frames are good stuff according to testimony around here, and it would seem to me that a Hab with 105 on it would be a difficult "price point" to beat, especially considering the "no paint, no rust" feature that will be important sooner or later as the bike is used. --D-y |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Opinions on two different makes of bikes | [email protected] | General | 28 | September 25th 07 03:10 AM |
Compact road crankset on a MTB frame...Bonus external bearing content | Barnard Frederick | Techniques | 8 | May 20th 06 01:28 PM |
FA: Giant TCR Compact Road frame | Wade Summers | Marketplace | 0 | February 18th 05 09:04 PM |
Compact Chainsets & Road Bikes | [Not Responding] | UK | 23 | December 17th 04 10:41 AM |
Compact frame vs Traditional Frame geometry | Dennis Vaughn | Techniques | 39 | September 4th 03 02:10 AM |