|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehicles at Red Lights"
Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who
make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. This shows that not only is he anti-motorist, but he is prepared for innocent people to die just so that motorists can be persecuted. In this case, the innocent people are those who the emergency services can't get to or take to hospital because drivers won't go through red lights for fear of prosecution. Don't believe me? Ask Chapman yourself. You won't get much out of him: this is one of those subjects that he refuses to talk about, because he doesn't want to admit the truth, nor does he want to lie (in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles should be prosecuted *and* not have any legal defence available to them in court? If so, it would seem (unless you can show otherwise) that you are also an anti-motorist monster with blood on your hands. What is the point of prosecuting such drivers, and why would you want them to be prosecuted, unless you were anti-motorist to such an extent that you were prepared for people to die just so that motorists could be given a hard time? What other possible reason would one have for advocating such prosecutions? I bet you can't come up with anything. Anyone who is remotely reasonable, and who doesn't consider persecuting motorists to be more important than saving innocent people's lives, must surely be of the opinion that we should not be prosecuting motorists who carefully make way for emergency vehicles at red lights. Unless anyone has any remotely good arguments to the contrary? |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehicles at Red Lights"
"Old Scarface" wrote in message
... Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. When and where did he say this? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehiclesat Red Lights"
On 30 Sep, 16:11, Old Scarface wrote:
Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. *This shows that not only is he anti-motorist, but he is prepared for innocent people to die just so that motorists can be persecuted. *In this case, the innocent people are those who the emergency services can't get to or take to hospital because drivers won't go through red lights for fear of prosecution. Don't believe me? *Ask Chapman yourself. *You won't get much out of him: this is one of those subjects that he refuses to talk about, because he doesn't want to admit the truth, nor does he want to lie (in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles should be prosecuted *and* not have any legal defence available to them in court? *If so, it would seem (unless you can show otherwise) that you are also an anti-motorist monster with blood on your hands. *What is the point of prosecuting such drivers, and why would you want them to be prosecuted, unless you were anti-motorist to such an extent that you were prepared for people to die just so that motorists could be given a hard time? *What other possible reason would one have for advocating such prosecutions? *I bet you can't come up with anything. Anyone who is remotely reasonable, and who doesn't consider persecuting motorists to be more important than saving innocent people's lives, must surely be of the opinion that we should not be prosecuting motorists who carefully make way for emergency vehicles at red lights. *Unless anyone has any remotely good arguments to the contrary? Oh my dog! Its Nuxxy back to his car-hating anti-motorist murderers theme. And to think he had disappeared for a while. Presumably because he has *had* to change ISP in the meantime. Oh its a shame ... What power the car-haters[1] have. Rudi [1] In the Nuxx world car-hater and anti-motorist are both synonyms for cyclist and more generally anyone who does not support the safe- speed agenda |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehiclesat Red Lights"
On 30 Sep, 16:11, Old Scarface wrote:
Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. *This shows that not only is he anti-motorist, but he is prepared for innocent people to die just so that motorists can be persecuted. *In this case, the innocent people are those who the emergency services can't get to or take to hospital because drivers won't go through red lights for fear of prosecution. Don't believe me? *Ask Chapman yourself. *You won't get much out of him: this is one of those subjects that he refuses to talk about, because he doesn't want to admit the truth, nor does he want to lie (in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles should be prosecuted *and* not have any legal defence available to them in court? *If so, it would seem (unless you can show otherwise) that you are also an anti-motorist monster with blood on your hands. *What is the point of prosecuting such drivers, and why would you want them to be prosecuted, unless you were anti-motorist to such an extent that you were prepared for people to die just so that motorists could be given a hard time? *What other possible reason would one have for advocating such prosecutions? *I bet you can't come up with anything. Anyone who is remotely reasonable, and who doesn't consider persecuting motorists to be more important than saving innocent people's lives, must surely be of the opinion that we should not be prosecuting motorists who carefully make way for emergency vehicles at red lights. *Unless anyone has any remotely good arguments to the contrary? Heh Nuxxy! Have you been prosecuted for going through red-lights? That would explain this demented rant ... Rudi |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehiclesat Red Lights"
Old Scarface wrote:
(in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Says "Old Scarface ", a known authority. BugBear |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehicles at Red Lights"
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT), RudiL
wrote: On 30 Sep, 16:11, Old Scarface wrote: Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. *This shows that not only is he anti-motorist, but he is prepared for innocent people to die just so that motorists can be persecuted. *In this case, the innocent people are those who the emergency services can't get to or take to hospital because drivers won't go through red lights for fear of prosecution. Don't believe me? *Ask Chapman yourself. *You won't get much out of him: this is one of those subjects that he refuses to talk about, because he doesn't want to admit the truth, nor does he want to lie (in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles should be prosecuted *and* not have any legal defence available to them in court? *If so, it would seem (unless you can show otherwise) that you are also an anti-motorist monster with blood on your hands. *What is the point of prosecuting such drivers, and why would you want them to be prosecuted, unless you were anti-motorist to such an extent that you were prepared for people to die just so that motorists could be given a hard time? *What other possible reason would one have for advocating such prosecutions? *I bet you can't come up with anything. Anyone who is remotely reasonable, and who doesn't consider persecuting motorists to be more important than saving innocent people's lives, must surely be of the opinion that we should not be prosecuting motorists who carefully make way for emergency vehicles at red lights. *Unless anyone has any remotely good arguments to the contrary? Heh Nuxxy! Have you been prosecuted for going through red-lights? That would explain this demented rant ... If you mean me, then no, I've never been prosecuted for going through a red light. Now it's your turn. Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by going through red lights (when there was no other way of letting them through) should be prosecuted? If so, why? Because you hate motorists, presumably? What possible other reason could there be? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehiclesat Red Lights"
On 30 Sep, 16:25, Old Skullface wrote:
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT), RudiL wrote: On 30 Sep, 16:11, Old Scarface wrote: Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. *This shows that not only is he anti-motorist, but he is prepared for innocent people to die just so that motorists can be persecuted. *In this case, the innocent people are those who the emergency services can't get to or take to hospital because drivers won't go through red lights for fear of prosecution. Don't believe me? *Ask Chapman yourself. *You won't get much out of him: this is one of those subjects that he refuses to talk about, because he doesn't want to admit the truth, nor does he want to lie (in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles should be prosecuted *and* not have any legal defence available to them in court? *If so, it would seem (unless you can show otherwise) that you are also an anti-motorist monster with blood on your hands. *What is the point of prosecuting such drivers, and why would you want them to be prosecuted, unless you were anti-motorist to such an extent that you were prepared for people to die just so that motorists could be given a hard time? *What other possible reason would one have for advocating such prosecutions? *I bet you can't come up with anything.. Anyone who is remotely reasonable, and who doesn't consider persecuting motorists to be more important than saving innocent people's lives, must surely be of the opinion that we should not be prosecuting motorists who carefully make way for emergency vehicles at red lights. *Unless anyone has any remotely good arguments to the contrary? Heh Nuxxy! Have you been prosecuted for going through red-lights? That would explain this demented rant ... If you mean me, then no, I've never been prosecuted for going through a red light. Now it's your turn. *Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by going through red lights (when there was no other way of letting them through) should be prosecuted? *If so, why? *Because you hate motorists, presumably? *What possible other reason could there be? As far as i know the driver was cleared so your earlier diatribe is just a rant by the usual suspect Rudi |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehicles at Red Lights"
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:31:06 -0700 (PDT), RudiL
wrote: On 30 Sep, 16:25, Old Skullface wrote: On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT), RudiL wrote: On 30 Sep, 16:11, Old Scarface wrote: Guy Chapman thinks (along with others here, no doubt) that drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by carefully going through red lights should be prosecuted and convicted. *This shows that not only is he anti-motorist, but he is prepared for innocent people to die just so that motorists can be persecuted. *In this case, the innocent people are those who the emergency services can't get to or take to hospital because drivers won't go through red lights for fear of prosecution. Don't believe me? *Ask Chapman yourself. *You won't get much out of him: this is one of those subjects that he refuses to talk about, because he doesn't want to admit the truth, nor does he want to lie (in other words it's another Lhuh Gnii-type thing). Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles should be prosecuted *and* not have any legal defence available to them in court? *If so, it would seem (unless you can show otherwise) that you are also an anti-motorist monster with blood on your hands. *What is the point of prosecuting such drivers, and why would you want them to be prosecuted, unless you were anti-motorist to such an extent that you were prepared for people to die just so that motorists could be given a hard time? *What other possible reason would one have for advocating such prosecutions? *I bet you can't come up with anything. Anyone who is remotely reasonable, and who doesn't consider persecuting motorists to be more important than saving innocent people's lives, must surely be of the opinion that we should not be prosecuting motorists who carefully make way for emergency vehicles at red lights. *Unless anyone has any remotely good arguments to the contrary? Heh Nuxxy! Have you been prosecuted for going through red-lights? That would explain this demented rant ... If you mean me, then no, I've never been prosecuted for going through a red light. Now it's your turn. *Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by going through red lights (when there was no other way of letting them through) should be prosecuted? *If so, why? *Because you hate motorists, presumably? *What possible other reason could there be? As far as i know the driver was cleared so your earlier diatribe is just a rant by the usual suspect You won't answer the question because the answer would be "Yes" and the reason would be "Because I hate motorists". Case closed. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehiclesat Red Lights"
On 30 Sep, 16:33, Old Skullface wrote:
You won't answer the question because the answer would be "Yes" and the reason would be "Because I hate motorists". *Case closed. What tight logical reasoning ... excellent! Now finally I realise I hate myself ... Rudi (a cyclist AND a motorist AND a pedestrian AND a public transport user) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Chapman: "Prosecute Drivers who Make Way for Emergency Vehicles at Red Lights"
On Wed, 30 Sep 2009 08:40:32 -0700 (PDT), RudiL
wrote: On 30 Sep, 16:33, Old Skullface wrote: You won't answer the question because the answer would be "Yes" and the reason would be "Because I hate motorists". *Case closed. What tight logical reasoning ... excellent! Now finally I realise I hate myself ... Rudi (a cyclist AND a motorist AND a pedestrian AND a public transport user) Do you think drivers who make way for emergency vehicles by going through red lights (when there was no other way of letting them through) should be prosecuted? *If so, why? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Roads are for vehicles, not slow bikes." | Anton Berlin | Racing | 6 | August 7th 09 11:01 PM |
Red Lights & Emergency Vehicles | Nuxx Bar | UK | 22 | April 18th 08 09:57 AM |
IMBA Uses 50+ Motor Vehicles to Put on Its "Environmentally Friendly" Epic Ride! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 0 | May 7th 07 04:15 PM |
IMBA Uses 50+ Motor Vehicles to Put on Its "Environmentally Friendly" Epic Ride! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 0 | May 7th 07 04:15 PM |
"Emergency puncture repair" aerosols | Travis | Australia | 8 | March 14th 06 12:12 AM |