A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old February 7th 20, 09:12 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

On 07/02/2020 09:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross the
road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones today,
so the current penalties for that offence can't be a deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.


********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies to your
trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if I post
anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as Bod.


Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there were more than four in reality.

You also post about walking your dog on here with your chisel for protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of here?


And a personal assault group.
Ads
  #12  
Old February 7th 20, 10:02 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

On 07/02/2020 09:12, Peter Keller wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross the
road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones today,
so the current penalties for that offence can't be a deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies to your
trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if I post
anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as Bod.


Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there were more than four in reality.

You also post about walking your dog on here with your chisel for protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of here?


And a personal assault group.

Carrying knives/screwdrivers and chisels etc is exactly what gang

members do.

--
Bod
  #13  
Old February 7th 20, 12:08 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Mason[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,244
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 9:31:38 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross
the road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones
today, so the current penalties for that offence can't be a
deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies to
your trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if I
post anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as
Bod.


Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their
laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there were
more than four in reality.

You also post about walking your dog on here with your chisel for
protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of
here?


Walking my dog was relevant to my postings here. Your silly made up driving
postings are not relevant to a cycling group.


My wife usually spots them first, you you can call her a liar as well.
  #14  
Old February 7th 20, 01:02 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,896
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 9:31:38 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross
the road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones
today, so the current penalties for that offence can't be a
deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies to
your trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if
I post anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as
Bod.

Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their
laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there were
more than four in reality.

You also post about walking your dog on here with your chisel for
protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of
here?


Walking my dog was relevant to my postings here. Your silly made up
driving postings are not relevant to a cycling group.


My wife usually spots them first, you you can call her a liar as well.


Wot?



  #15  
Old February 7th 20, 01:05 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,896
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:12, Peter Keller wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross
the road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones
today, so the current penalties for that offence can't be a
deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies
to your trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if
I post anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as
Bod.

Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their
laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there
were more than four in reality. You also post about walking your dog
on here with your chisel for
protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of
here?


And a personal assault group.

Carrying knives/screwdrivers and chisels etc is exactly what gang

members do.


Yip.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...th-London.html



  #16  
Old February 7th 20, 01:10 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Simon Mason[_6_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,244
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 1:02:52 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:

My wife usually spots them first, you you can call her a liar as well.


Wot?


My wife usually sees drivers on their phones before me as I am looking where I am going.
  #17  
Old February 7th 20, 01:21 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

On 07/02/2020 13:05, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:12, Peter Keller wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross
the road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones
today, so the current penalties for that offence can't be a
deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies
to your trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if
I post anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as
Bod.

Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their
laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there
were more than four in reality. You also post about walking your dog
on here with your chisel for
protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of
here?

And a personal assault group.

Carrying knives/screwdrivers and chisels etc is exactly what gang

members do.


Yip.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...th-London.html


The point is that ALL gang members carry knives, most cyclists do not and neither do most pedestrians.

see the difference?



--
Bod
  #18  
Old February 7th 20, 01:26 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Bod[_5_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,516
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

On 07/02/2020 13:21, Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 13:05, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:12, Peter Keller wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320 wrote:

The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to cross
the road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones
today, so the current penalties for that offence can't be a
deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies
to your trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but if
I post anything here it is always to do with cycling, not driving.
Post something on cycling, not driving. You are getting as bad as
Bod.

Those four did not include many more who were staring down at their
laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect there
were more than four in reality.Â* You also post about walking your dog
on here with your chisel for
protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead of
here?

And a personal assault group.

Carrying knives/screwdrivers and chisels etc is exactly what gang
members do.


Yip.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...th-London.html



The point is that ALL gang members carry knives, most cyclists do not
and neither do most pedestrians.

see the difference?


Which sharply pointed objects can you legally carry? | James ...

11 Feb 2010 - Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 makes it an
offence to have "any article which has a blade or is sharply pointed" in
a public place. The only type of knife that is excluded from this
definition is a "folding pocketknife", a penknife in normal parlance,
with a blade of three inches or less.


--
Bod
  #19  
Old February 7th 20, 03:17 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,896
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

Simon Mason wrote:
On Friday, February 7, 2020 at 1:02:52 PM UTC, Mr Pounder Esquire
wrote:

My wife usually spots them first, you you can call her a liar as
well.


Wot?


My wife usually sees drivers on their phones before me as I am
looking where I am going.


More bull****.


  #20  
Old February 7th 20, 03:18 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Mr Pounder Esquire
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,896
Default Could Ford's emoji jacket save the lives of cyclists in London?

Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 13:21, Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 13:05, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Bod wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:12, Peter Keller wrote:
On 07/02/2020 09:42, Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 8:26:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 6:08:17 PM UTC, Mr Pounder
Esquire wrote:
Simon Mason wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2020 at 2:48:40 PM UTC, TMS320
wrote:
The only way to save some of the poor souls that have to
cross the road *anywhere* would be for drivers to take more
care.

I have seen FOUR oncoming drivers talking into mobile phones
today, so the current penalties for that offence can't be a
deterrent.

Like **** you have.

Four drivers in 36 miles is not unusual.

********. You are so bored that you are just looking for replies
to your trolling and making things up.
This is a cycling group, not a driving group. I'm a driver, but
if I post anything here it is always to do with cycling, not
driving. Post something on cycling, not driving. You are
getting as bad as Bod.

Those four did not include many more who were staring down at
their laps thus not looking where they were going, so I suspect
there were more than four in reality. You also post about
walking your dog on here with your chisel for
protection, so maybe your should post in a walking group instead
of here?

And a personal assault group.

Carrying knives/screwdrivers and chisels etc is exactly what gang
members do.

Yip.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...th-London.html



The point is that ALL gang members carry knives, most cyclists do
not and neither do most pedestrians.

see the difference?


Which sharply pointed objects can you legally carry? | James ...

11 Feb 2010 - Section 139 of the Criminal Justice Act 1988 makes it an
offence to have "any article which has a blade or is sharply pointed"
in a public place. The only type of knife that is excluded from this
definition is a "folding pocketknife", a penknife in normal parlance,
with a blade of three inches or less.


Ffs get a life.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
helmets save lives AMuzi Techniques 10 May 26th 17 04:46 AM
'Ban Cycling, Save Lives' ... Anthony 'Piss_Taker' Janssen UK 0 April 24th 16 03:27 PM
Cycle lanes save lives POHB UK 2 July 18th 07 11:44 AM
Bicycle helmet law can save lives Garrison Hilliard General 146 May 19th 04 05:42 AM
Law on cycle helmets 'would save lives' Mucco UK 14 May 18th 04 12:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.