|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
rubber ducky as pedestrian avoidance
On Feb 17, 2:28*pm, wrote:
On Feb 17, 2:24*pm, Jay Beattie wrote: On Feb 17, 11:13*am, Henry wrote: I commute along narrow paths every day, which I have to share with pedestrians. When I'm walking I find bicycle bells quite "alarming"; and I see a lot of people wetting their pants when I ride up behind them, no matter how slowly. I've seen someone in the past with a rubber ducky on their MTB/ commuter, which I think is an excellent idea; I think people are going to respond much more favorably than shouting, changing front dérailleur noise or bells/whistles. Anyone got experience with mounting this sort of thing on MTB handle bars? TIA I've also considered air-assisted truck horns but that seems rude ;P I think bike bells are a better idea because they are associated with (drum roll please) . . . bikes. * A rubber ducky is less alarming, but it is also non-specific. *Maybe you could get a bell that is not so loud. *Is there any way you can avoid these paths? I ride a path along a river sometimes that is popular with runners -- with dogs, baby strollers, five abreast, etc. *There is no winning. Twenty percent go left when you say "on your left." *Ring a bell and some stop and turn. *It's like dealing with giant squirrels. It is somewhat better at night because my light signals my approach and location. -- Jay Beattie.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - you need to change your phrase; try saying in a calm clear voice well in advance of passing "I am passing you on your left/right" it works well without causing fear- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - I usually say, from a reasonable distance back, "Coming around on your left" or "Passing on your left". Then, when I'm close, I say "thank you". By the time I say thanks I'm close enough that they can easily distinguish that I'm to their left, which I hope helps avoid them stepping left. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
rubber ducky as pedestrian avoidance
I usually say, from a reasonable distance back, "Coming around on your
left" or "Passing on your left". Then, when I'm close, I say "thank you". By the time I say thanks I'm close enough that they can easily distinguish that I'm to their left, which I hope helps avoid them stepping left. I, too, am a stickler for politeness and non ambiguity when I' m passing pedestrians, skaters, etc. The problem is, here in New York, I'd say 90 percent of the people on foot or skates are lost in their iPods and cannot hear a gentle voice warning. When you pass them, they get startled and look at you as if you're a despicable human being. I once very cautiously passed a skater on a bike path after attempting unsuccessfully to alert her that I was coming up from behind. Her ear buds were wedged so far into her head that they must have been rubbing her brain every time she took another stride. Once I safely passed and made eye contact with her, I mouthed "thank you," as I usually do. With that, she ripped out her ear buds and yelled back "f-ck you, too, a-hole!" I kept riding... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
rubber ducky as pedestrian avoidance
On Feb 18, 10:17*pm, "Papa Tom" wrote:
I once very cautiously passed a skater on a bike path after attempting unsuccessfully to alert her that I was coming up from behind. *Her ear buds were wedged so far into her head that they must have been rubbing her brain every time she took another stride. *Once I safely passed and made eye contact with her, I mouthed "thank you," as I usually do. *With that, she ripped out her ear buds and yelled back "f-ck you, too, a-hole!" I kept riding... You shoulda stopped and taken up the lady on her explicit offer... Andre Jute Always charming PS I agree with you about courtesy to pedestrians and drivers. I thank them for waiting for me at the pedestrian crossing. Hell, I train my pets, why not the motorists in my environment. But I must tell you that several of the ladies who walk the lanes where I cycle, often in pairs or threesomes, but sometimes alone, would rather hear you calling or ringing the bell well behind them than suddenly just ride past and startle them, especially if your bike is very silent, as all mine are now that I have only internal gear hubs -- not that I think derailleur gears are loud enough for a proper warning either. I said to a pair of obviously startled ladies one day, "I didn't want to be rude and ring the bell when there is ample space for all of us." And one replied, "Rather rude than give us a heart attack, sir." So now I just call out from way back, "Fine day, ladies! Coming by." I very rarely use the bell as it is common here to address strangers and in the countryside and on the pavements to hold conversations with them, so it isn't considered rude to call out to strangers from a distance. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
rubber ducky as pedestrian avoidance
On Feb 18, 5:17*pm, "Papa Tom" wrote:
I usually say, from a reasonable distance back, "Coming around on your left" or "Passing on your left". *Then, when I'm close, I say "thank you". *By the time I say thanks I'm close enough that they can easily distinguish that I'm to their left, which I hope helps avoid them stepping left. I, too, am a stickler for politeness and non ambiguity when I' m passing pedestrians, skaters, etc. *The problem is, here in New York, I'd say 90 percent of the people on foot or skates are lost in their iPods and cannot hear a gentle voice warning. *When you pass them, they get startled and look at you as if you're a despicable human being. I once very cautiously passed a skater on a bike path after attempting unsuccessfully to alert her that I was coming up from behind. *Her ear buds were wedged so far into her head that they must have been rubbing her brain every time she took another stride. *Once I safely passed and made eye contact with her, I mouthed "thank you," as I usually do. *With that, she ripped out her ear buds and yelled back "f-ck you, too, a-hole!" I kept riding... The upside to the earbud crowd is they're unlikely to be spooked by the sound of your bike and jump unpredictably into your path. It can happen randomly but that's less likely. My technique works pretty well for me overall. Only 943 pedestrian collisions per year on average. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
rubber ducky as pedestrian avoidance
On Feb 17, 10:28*pm, Michael Press wrote:
I use the brass Incredbell, single ding, and do not shock pedestrians. Well of course. You need the handlebar-mounted Taser for that. I ding once from way back, and possibly one more time. I do not ding from directly behind, but from behind and laterally displaced on a course that will pass them safely. I similarly try to pass them laterally displaced, but skip the Incredibell and attempt to ding them with this instead: http://madrone.equestrianguild.org/A...ting_lance.htm Ben |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
rubber ducky as pedestrian avoidance
On Feb 18, 2:17 pm, Eric Vey wrote:
Henry wrote: I commute along narrow paths every day, which I have to share with pedestrians. Does your city not give you perfectly good streets to use? I prefer the street to paths since I prefer to share with autos than pedestrians. no, otherwise I wouldn't have asked |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Hit a pedestrian | Claire Petersky | General | 41 | December 8th 07 02:13 PM |
strategies for injury avoidance | flaps | Australia | 1 | June 13th 06 12:37 PM |
pedestrian hit by cyclist | Ian Smith | UK | 6 | April 18th 05 03:06 PM |
Got my first pedestrian last night | SteveA | Australia | 26 | February 7th 05 11:51 AM |
Anyone ever hit a pedestrian? | greentyres | UK | 54 | November 12th 04 07:52 PM |