#41
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 00:13, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 10/03/2011 02:57, Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. Nail, hit, head. What kind of tosser goes out with a ****ing camera on his bike? Someone that has had too many close shaves from other road users, otherwise it's his word against a car full of mates. |
Ads |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 07:08, Mrcheerful wrote:
Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 06:52, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 09:34, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:11, Mrcheerful wrote: Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. riding faster than the conditions dictate and probably no signal, both cyclist and car at fault. What a load of bull, the conditions couldn't have been much better, bright clear day, dry road, nothing in front of him, probably nothing behind. The cyclist was already level with the mini-roundabout when the car crossed the line, so no time for 'signalling', whatever signal means your taking the second exit, and no time to slow down. Why must you always lay part of the blame on the innocent party just because they don't have an engine? That motorist was either not paying attention and didn't see the cyclist or somehow assumed the cyclist was taking the 1st exit without bothering to signal. The driver of the black car on the other side of the road pulled out because he was expecting him to give way to the cyclist. 100% the drivers fault. I come across similar circumstances almost every day, yet I don't crash into them. People make mistakes, they misjudge which exit you are taking, that is just part of using the roads. Nope. There are THOUSANDS of accidents on our roads due to this type of behaviour, how many of them got the blame for the other party pulling out in front of them? If the cyclist had been taking sufficient care the crash would not have occurred, remember your highway code for thinking and braking distances when trying to stop. I am glad to see you agree that the cyclist was travelling too fast for the situation. Oh right... Do you slow down to 10 mph when coming to a junction when a car is waiting to pull out, just to be on the safe side? Didn't think so. We are talking about a vulnerable cyclist at a mini roundabout, he should slow to whatever speed is the safe one for the situation. It is better to be a little late in this world than early in the next. What is the point of being injured unnecessarily? Using that logic means making the max speed limit in towns 10mph. Or better still, a man walking in front of you waving a red flag... Everybody has a right to expect others to follow the rules, whether it's being more observant and not pulling out when you're not supposed to, or not stepping onto a fast busy road whilst listening to a MP3 player. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
Dex wrote:
On 11/03/2011 07:08, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 06:52, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 09:34, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:11, Mrcheerful wrote: Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. riding faster than the conditions dictate and probably no signal, both cyclist and car at fault. What a load of bull, the conditions couldn't have been much better, bright clear day, dry road, nothing in front of him, probably nothing behind. The cyclist was already level with the mini-roundabout when the car crossed the line, so no time for 'signalling', whatever signal means your taking the second exit, and no time to slow down. Why must you always lay part of the blame on the innocent party just because they don't have an engine? That motorist was either not paying attention and didn't see the cyclist or somehow assumed the cyclist was taking the 1st exit without bothering to signal. The driver of the black car on the other side of the road pulled out because he was expecting him to give way to the cyclist. 100% the drivers fault. I come across similar circumstances almost every day, yet I don't crash into them. People make mistakes, they misjudge which exit you are taking, that is just part of using the roads. Nope. There are THOUSANDS of accidents on our roads due to this type of behaviour, how many of them got the blame for the other party pulling out in front of them? If the cyclist had been taking sufficient care the crash would not have occurred, remember your highway code for thinking and braking distances when trying to stop. I am glad to see you agree that the cyclist was travelling too fast for the situation. Oh right... Do you slow down to 10 mph when coming to a junction when a car is waiting to pull out, just to be on the safe side? Didn't think so. We are talking about a vulnerable cyclist at a mini roundabout, he should slow to whatever speed is the safe one for the situation. It is better to be a little late in this world than early in the next. What is the point of being injured unnecessarily? Using that logic means making the max speed limit in towns 10mph. Or better still, a man walking in front of you waving a red flag... Everybody has a right to expect others to follow the rules, whether it's being more observant and not pulling out when you're not supposed to, or not stepping onto a fast busy road whilst listening to a MP3 player. everyone has a duty to protect themselves and others. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 07:56, Mrcheerful wrote:
Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 07:08, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 06:52, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 09:34, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:11, Mrcheerful wrote: Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. riding faster than the conditions dictate and probably no signal, both cyclist and car at fault. What a load of bull, the conditions couldn't have been much better, bright clear day, dry road, nothing in front of him, probably nothing behind. The cyclist was already level with the mini-roundabout when the car crossed the line, so no time for 'signalling', whatever signal means your taking the second exit, and no time to slow down. Why must you always lay part of the blame on the innocent party just because they don't have an engine? That motorist was either not paying attention and didn't see the cyclist or somehow assumed the cyclist was taking the 1st exit without bothering to signal. The driver of the black car on the other side of the road pulled out because he was expecting him to give way to the cyclist. 100% the drivers fault. I come across similar circumstances almost every day, yet I don't crash into them. People make mistakes, they misjudge which exit you are taking, that is just part of using the roads. Nope. There are THOUSANDS of accidents on our roads due to this type of behaviour, how many of them got the blame for the other party pulling out in front of them? If the cyclist had been taking sufficient care the crash would not have occurred, remember your highway code for thinking and braking distances when trying to stop. I am glad to see you agree that the cyclist was travelling too fast for the situation. Oh right... Do you slow down to 10 mph when coming to a junction when a car is waiting to pull out, just to be on the safe side? Didn't think so. We are talking about a vulnerable cyclist at a mini roundabout, he should slow to whatever speed is the safe one for the situation. It is better to be a little late in this world than early in the next. What is the point of being injured unnecessarily? Using that logic means making the max speed limit in towns 10mph. Or better still, a man walking in front of you waving a red flag... Everybody has a right to expect others to follow the rules, whether it's being more observant and not pulling out when you're not supposed to, or not stepping onto a fast busy road whilst listening to a MP3 player. everyone has a duty to protect themselves and others. Then go buy an assault rifle to protect your loved ones from burglars. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
Dex wrote:
On 11/03/2011 07:56, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 07:08, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 06:52, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 09:34, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:11, Mrcheerful wrote: Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. riding faster than the conditions dictate and probably no signal, both cyclist and car at fault. What a load of bull, the conditions couldn't have been much better, bright clear day, dry road, nothing in front of him, probably nothing behind. The cyclist was already level with the mini-roundabout when the car crossed the line, so no time for 'signalling', whatever signal means your taking the second exit, and no time to slow down. Why must you always lay part of the blame on the innocent party just because they don't have an engine? That motorist was either not paying attention and didn't see the cyclist or somehow assumed the cyclist was taking the 1st exit without bothering to signal. The driver of the black car on the other side of the road pulled out because he was expecting him to give way to the cyclist. 100% the drivers fault. I come across similar circumstances almost every day, yet I don't crash into them. People make mistakes, they misjudge which exit you are taking, that is just part of using the roads. Nope. There are THOUSANDS of accidents on our roads due to this type of behaviour, how many of them got the blame for the other party pulling out in front of them? If the cyclist had been taking sufficient care the crash would not have occurred, remember your highway code for thinking and braking distances when trying to stop. I am glad to see you agree that the cyclist was travelling too fast for the situation. Oh right... Do you slow down to 10 mph when coming to a junction when a car is waiting to pull out, just to be on the safe side? Didn't think so. We are talking about a vulnerable cyclist at a mini roundabout, he should slow to whatever speed is the safe one for the situation. It is better to be a little late in this world than early in the next. What is the point of being injured unnecessarily? Using that logic means making the max speed limit in towns 10mph. Or better still, a man walking in front of you waving a red flag... Everybody has a right to expect others to follow the rules, whether it's being more observant and not pulling out when you're not supposed to, or not stepping onto a fast busy road whilst listening to a MP3 player. everyone has a duty to protect themselves and others. Then go buy an assault rifle to protect your loved ones from burglars. I actually was referring to using the roads: we have a moral duty to protect ourselves and others from harm. The cyclist could have avoided harm by more careful riding. Almost every crash can be avoided if all parties take sufficient care, it is when several take insufficient care at the same point that the crashes happen. There is no point having an 'I am in the right' attitude on the roads, especially if you are very vulnerable. When approaching road hazards use the IPSGA system. The cyclist in the clip did not get past I (information) |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 10/03/2011 21:47, Tony Raven wrote:
wrote: not at all. any competent road user would not have hit that car. From the moment the front bumper of the car crosses the white line to the moment of impact is 0.6s. The average fingertip reaction time is about 0.25s. Braking from 10mph at maximum for a bicycle (~0.5G) takes 0.45s. That's 0.7s to stop under ideal conditions from travelling at a slow speed. The accident was unavoidable. I don't agree wioth that last comment. In those conditions, I would not have been involved in a collision (cet. par.). It was avoidable and most people would have been able to avoid it. Of course, a mindest of "It's my right of way and he must NOT cross my path" woul not help. Knowing how the situation can change quickly is part of the art of roadcraft and part of the skill of proceeding safely. Those who cannot grasp basic concepts with respect to using the road are more or less riding for a fall. Sometimes literally. Being in the right hasn't helped him at all. |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 06:46, Dex wrote:
On 10/03/2011 09:34, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:11, Mrcheerful wrote: Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. riding faster than the conditions dictate and probably no signal, both cyclist and car at fault. What a load of bull, the conditions couldn't have been much better, bright clear day, dry road, nothing in front of him, probably nothing behind. The cyclist was already level with the mini-roundabout when the car crossed the line, so no time for 'signalling', whatever signal means your taking the second exit, and no time to slow down. Why must you always lay part of the blame on the innocent party just because they don't have an engine? That motorist was either not paying attention and didn't see the cyclist or somehow assumed the cyclist was taking the 1st exit without bothering to signal. The driver of the black car on the other side of the road pulled out because he was expecting him to give way to the cyclist. 100% the drivers fault. I come across similar circumstances almost every day, yet I don't crash into them. People make mistakes, they misjudge which exit you are taking, that is just part of using the roads. Nope. There are THOUSANDS of accidents on our roads due to this type of behaviour, how many of them got the blame for the other party pulling out in front of them? If the cyclist had been taking sufficient care the crash would not have occurred, Rubbish, save the vid to your favourite media player and see how much time the cyclist had to react once the driver crossed the line, then remember your highway code for thinking and braking distances when trying to stop. likewise if the car had been more cautious the crash would not have happened, both parties are at fault. By the looks of the comments the DRIVER was the one prosecuted, not both, and the coppers had the evidence to prove it was only one parties fault, the motorist. It is no good being 'in the right' if you crash into something, whether you are in a car or not. But if you are very vulnerable like a cyclist then it makes even more sense to ride very cautiously and with massive forethought. As to the indication: the cyclist should have (may have) indicated right on approach to the roundabout (and hopefully left before his exit, but that is less likely) and I would have taken a further right road position and proceeded cautiously till I had at least made eye contact with the car driver and was certain it was staying put. Look at the vid again, none of the cars seen were indicating, especially the bloke pulling out in front of the cyclist, yet the cyclist was at fault for not indicating? Very twisted logic. Let's hope you are never seen anywhere near a crash investigation. Do be careful not to offer personal abuse when posting, dear chap. Your attitude to it is decidedly odd. You see it where it doesn't exist and fail to see it when you resort to it. |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 06:56, Mrcheerful wrote:
Tom Crispin wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:41:20 -0000, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Tom Crispin wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:23:11 +0000, JNugent wrote: On 10/03/2011 20:20, Mrcheerful wrote: Steve Walker wrote: Mrcheerful wrote: Mr Pounder wrote: Look, I like cyclists as much as you do. The car pulled out in front of him. yes it did, and a competent road user would not have collided with it. You would rather be provocative than accurate? Fair enough. not at all. any competent road user would not have hit that car. To be fair, that's imponderable. Maybe they would, maybe not. I would still have expected a sufficiently cautious traveller to make a serious attempt to slow, stop or change direction. It appears to me that the cyclist did attempt to change direction, but it was too little, too late. The motorist slows down as he approaches the roundabout, then enters the roundabout appearing to accelerate. According to the cyclist, the motorist claimed he stopped at the roundabout, but dazzled by sunlight moved cautiously forward. This is evidently untrue, but from the cyclist's headcam it does look like the driver is about to stop. At the moment the driver enters the roundabout the cyclist blasphemes, and tries to swerve to the right, but there is no time to avoid the collision, even an instantaneous stop would not have helped at that point. so he was travelling too fast for the situation. Evidently, yes. Had he been pootling at 5 mph he would have been able to avoid the consequence of the incompetent driving of the culprit. But that says little. It is not reasonable to expect cyclists to keep to 5mph in case an unfit driver is approaching. The correct course of action is to punish the unfit driver, and make him accept appropriate remedial consequences. If 5,mph is the right speed for a situation then use it. You can always speed up later, it is after all a junction which is where most crashes occur. More care by either party would have prevented this crash. 5mph, no injury sounds like an excellent result to me. Quite so, although in the case cited, the cyclist could have proceeded more safely at rather *more* than 5mph, but less then the 20+ mph (perhaps as much as 30) it looks as though he was actually doing. IOW, 5mph is a bit of a strawman. |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 07:04, Tom Crispin wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 06:56:00 -0000, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Tom Crispin wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 21:41:20 -0000, "Mrcheerful" wrote: Tom Crispin wrote: On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 20:23:11 +0000, JNugent wrote: On 10/03/2011 20:20, Mrcheerful wrote: Steve Walker wrote: Mrcheerful wrote: Mr Pounder wrote: Look, I like cyclists as much as you do. The car pulled out in front of him. yes it did, and a competent road user would not have collided with it. You would rather be provocative than accurate? Fair enough. not at all. any competent road user would not have hit that car. To be fair, that's imponderable. Maybe they would, maybe not. I would still have expected a sufficiently cautious traveller to make a serious attempt to slow, stop or change direction. It appears to me that the cyclist did attempt to change direction, but it was too little, too late. The motorist slows down as he approaches the roundabout, then enters the roundabout appearing to accelerate. According to the cyclist, the motorist claimed he stopped at the roundabout, but dazzled by sunlight moved cautiously forward. This is evidently untrue, but from the cyclist's headcam it does look like the driver is about to stop. At the moment the driver enters the roundabout the cyclist blasphemes, and tries to swerve to the right, but there is no time to avoid the collision, even an instantaneous stop would not have helped at that point. so he was travelling too fast for the situation. Evidently, yes. Had he been pootling at 5 mph he would have been able to avoid the consequence of the incompetent driving of the culprit. But that says little. It is not reasonable to expect cyclists to keep to 5mph in case an unfit driver is approaching. The correct course of action is to punish the unfit driver, and make him accept appropriate remedial consequences. If 5,mph is the right speed for a situation then use it. You can always speed up later, it is after all a junction which is where most crashes occur. More care by either party would have prevented this crash. 5mph, no injury sounds like an excellent result to me. I'll remember that advice next time I come to a mini roundabout, or pass a side road, or any other junction with some cheerful chappie behind me. "If 5mph is the right speed for a situation, then [travel at 5mph]" is excellent advice. It scales up (and down) and cannot be falsified. The alternative advice (which you seem to prefer to give and receive) is: "If n mph is the *wrong* speed for a situation, travel at n mph". |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
OUCH
On 11/03/2011 07:36, Dex wrote:
On 11/03/2011 07:08, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 11/03/2011 06:52, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 09:34, Mrcheerful wrote: Dex wrote: On 10/03/2011 07:11, Mrcheerful wrote: Nuxx Bar wrote: Cyclist hit head on by car, looks bloody painful: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvJBNiEVSug Incidents like that are belittled by people like Jackson who go out with their helmet cams looking for trouble. riding faster than the conditions dictate and probably no signal, both cyclist and car at fault. What a load of bull, the conditions couldn't have been much better, bright clear day, dry road, nothing in front of him, probably nothing behind. The cyclist was already level with the mini-roundabout when the car crossed the line, so no time for 'signalling', whatever signal means your taking the second exit, and no time to slow down. Why must you always lay part of the blame on the innocent party just because they don't have an engine? That motorist was either not paying attention and didn't see the cyclist or somehow assumed the cyclist was taking the 1st exit without bothering to signal. The driver of the black car on the other side of the road pulled out because he was expecting him to give way to the cyclist. 100% the drivers fault. I come across similar circumstances almost every day, yet I don't crash into them. People make mistakes, they misjudge which exit you are taking, that is just part of using the roads. Nope. There are THOUSANDS of accidents on our roads due to this type of behaviour, how many of them got the blame for the other party pulling out in front of them? If the cyclist had been taking sufficient care the crash would not have occurred, remember your highway code for thinking and braking distances when trying to stop. I am glad to see you agree that the cyclist was travelling too fast for the situation. Oh right... Do you slow down to 10 mph when coming to a junction when a car is waiting to pull out, just to be on the safe side? Didn't think so. We are talking about a vulnerable cyclist at a mini roundabout, he should slow to whatever speed is the safe one for the situation. It is better to be a little late in this world than early in the next. What is the point of being injured unnecessarily? Using that logic means making the max speed limit in towns 10mph. Or better still, a man walking in front of you waving a red flag... It doesn't mean that at all. See if you can work out where your "logic" went wrong. Everybody has a right to expect others to follow the rules, Do they? Where is that enshrined in law? whether it's being more observant and not pulling out when you're not supposed to, or not stepping onto a fast busy road whilst listening to a MP3 player. It's an expectation. You do not have a right to collide with a road-user who has broken with the rules if you can otherwise avoid the collision). |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ouch | congokid | UK | 3 | January 30th 07 12:03 AM |
ouch!!!! | Chexjc | Unicycling | 19 | October 12th 06 04:21 PM |
Ouch | D.M. Procida | UK | 22 | September 5th 06 02:52 PM |
Ouch! | David Martin | UK | 1 | August 22nd 05 08:32 AM |
Ouch again! | Bill C | Racing | 0 | July 15th 05 11:55 PM |