#31
|
|||
|
|||
Vandeman one post closer to death
Mike Vandeman wrote in
: On 13 Mar 2007 13:22:06 GMT, Chris wrote: Mike Vandeman wrote in m: Path: free.teranews.com!sam.nntpserver.com!nntpserver.co m! zeus.nntpserver.com !newshub.sdsu.edu!newscon04.news.prodigy.net!prodi gy.net! newsdst01.news .prodigy.net!prodigy.com!postmaster.news.prodigy.c om! newssvr25.news.pro digy.net.POSTED!fe8fce9b!not-for-mail From: Mike Vandeman Newsgroups: alt.mountain- bike,rec.bicycles.soc,rec.backcountry,ca.environ ment,sci.e nvironment Subject: Vandeman one post closer to death Message-ID: References: . com X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.2/32.830 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Lines: 37 NNTP-Posting-Host: 75.28.165.203 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: newssvr25.news.prodigy.net 1173745029 ST000 75.28.165.203 (Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:17:09 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 19:17:09 EST Organization: SBC http://yahoo.sbc.com X-UserInfo1: FKPO@MC@OHUGB]LY@BJNOFTBTR\B@GXLN@GZ_GYO^BSZUSAANVUEAE[YETZPIWWI [FCIZA^ NBFXZ_D[BFNTCNVPDTNTKHWXKB@X^B_OCJLPZ@ET_O[G\XSG@E\G [ZKVLBL^CJINM@I_KVI OR\T_M_AW_M[_BWU_HFA_]@A_A^SGFAUDE_DFTMQPFWVW[QPJN Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 00:17:09 GMT Xref: free.teranews.com alt.mountain-bike:464030 rec.bicycles.soc:112946 rec.backcountry:263074 ca.environment:36509 sci.environment:509322 On 12 Mar 2007 17:10:48 GMT, Chris wrote: Obviously, you ignore the REAL scientists, environmentalists and researchers who conduct and compile the research that has allowed off-road cycling to be recognized by the NFS, NPS and land managers nationwide. You say you have not "found anyone who disagrees...". Names? Locations? Who are these "mystery people"? Where are the direct quotes from actual and real scientists and environmental researchers who have said directlty that they agree with the views of Mike Vandeman concerning off-road cycling? What actual field research have you done? What are the opinions of those whose actual work and research you butcher in order to claim a foundation for your opinions? Your "reviews" have been put out to pasture as nobody needs the services of a self-appointed "middle-man" to INTERPRET and SPIN the results when the actual research and those conducting it are readily available by the internet. You have been requested for years to supply names that can be verified. You only respond with "because I say so". Hardly scientific and definately not the response from someone who has conviction in their statements. If you have not found anyone with credentials who disagrees with your opinions, you have been living in a bubble and purposefully looking away from the truth. Yawn. GOT YOUR ASS KICKED AGAIN. In your dreams. No, not in my dreams. You were asked once again to back up your perspective, and once again, you did/could not. Did not. Why respond to nonsense? When you get your ass kicked, you always revert to "Yawn", or "Did you say something". No, when I'm talking to an idiot, like you, I just respond appropriately. Appear that name calling is your main means of defending your position. I simply asked you to back up your argument with facts and you replied with calling me an idiot. That is exactly how my 6 year old replies. If you have clearly proven your point, there is a record of it in the archives of these news groups. I have looked (to a limited degree) and have yet to see where you voice more than an opinion. Please point me to where 'other people agree with you'. Once that occurs, I may champion you argument for you. I little background. I own (inherited) a large section of land in southern colorado. No humans are allowed on the land, no hunters, no fisherman, nobody. My grandfather built a cabin in about 1920. We cut 1 tree a year for fire wood and I have a well for water (nasty water). The cabin now has electricty since I installed both photovotaic and thermal solar panels. Our land in NOT open range, so no cattle are allowed on it, only the wild mule deer, elk, coyote, and the hundreds of other species that live here naturally. My point is: I walk the walk. I dont talk the talk like you appear to be. Please answer the questions. Back up your point of view with cold hard facts. Once you have done this, you may convince people that your perspective is correct, until then, you will continue to be a joke. I have, many times, as you well know. === I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8 years fighting auto dependence and road construction.) Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of! http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande -- Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com |
Ads |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Work on Main Yarra Trail | cfsmtb | Australia | 0 | July 25th 06 06:59 AM |
Our First Trail Work | Ride-A-Lot | Mountain Biking | 0 | February 10th 06 08:17 PM |
TR: trail work in the fog | small change | Mountain Biking | 9 | October 10th 05 05:12 PM |
Yet more trail work... | John Harlow | Mountain Biking | 12 | November 16th 03 06:32 AM |
Trail work... | Roger Buchanan | Mountain Biking | 26 | October 23rd 03 11:01 PM |