ok, this is a dead group?

So i'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since i posted. Is r.b.m dead?
Where can i go for tandem advice?

ty.max

On 7/15/10 2:22 AM, max wrote:
So i'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since i posted. Is r.b.m dead?
Where can i go for tandem advice?

Tech advice is r.b.tech.

Jobst Brandt wrote:
Max Betatron wrote:

So I'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since I posted. Is r.b.m
dead? Where can I go for tandem advice?

You are the typical cause of the problem,


Bull****.


offering anonymous


He is not anonymous, he is max monningh.


wise
cracks instead of presenting a problem. I saw neither a question nor
a report about your bike.


Just because it has not entered your perception does not mean
that it does not exist.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...769e4ad9ee93f3


The readers are not amused.


I'm laughing at you. Does that count?


--
Tad McClellan
email: perl -le "print scalar reverse qq/moc.liamg\100cm.j.dat/"
The above message is a Usenet post.
I don't recall having given anyone permission to use it on a Web site.

max wrote:

Where can i go for tandem advice?

rec.bicycles.schizophrenic

Bill "I think that's right...and so do I" S.

On Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:27:30 -0700, "Bill Sornson"
wrote:

max wrote:

Where can i go for tandem advice?

rec.bicycles.schizophrenic

You're never alone with a schizophrenic.

On Jul 15, 3:22*am, max wrote:
So i'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since i posted. *Is r.b.m dead? *
Where can i go for tandem advice?


Of course it's not a dead group! This is where monkeys talk about
capitalism and Jesus.

Oh, you wanted to talk bicycles? Well, that's been out of line here
lately. Try rec.bicycles.tech. The forces of obnoxiousness haven't
quite succeeded in killing that group.

Yet.

- Frank Krygowski

In article ,
Tad McClellan wrote:

Jobst Brandt wrote:
Max Betatron wrote:

So I'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since I posted. Is r.b.m
dead? Where can I go for tandem advice?

You are the typical cause of the problem,


Bull****.


offering anonymous


He is not anonymous, he is max monningh.


wise
cracks instead of presenting a problem. I saw neither a question nor
a report about your bike.


Just because it has not entered your perception does not mean
that it does not exist.

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.b...ad/thread/b3f2
817d2bc0caac/f9769e4ad9ee93f3


The readers are not amused.


I'm laughing at you. Does that count?

looking at that article, i think i may have had some ambien just before
i started typing...

On Jul 15, 12:22*am, max wrote:
So i'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since i posted. *Is r.b.m dead? *

Sadly, yes, it is dead.

Where can i go for tandem advice?

Go to the tandem mailing list, which is alive and vibrant.
Instructions are over yonder:

http://sdcc3.ucsd.edu/home-pages/wade/tandem.html

Warm Regards,

Claire

Claire wrote, On 7/18/2010 7:26 PM:
On Jul 15, 12:22 am, wrote:

So i'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since i posted. Is r.b.m dead?

Sadly, yes, it is dead.


Where can i go for tandem advice?

Go to the tandem mailing list, which is alive and vibrant.
Instructions are over yonder:

http://sdcc3.ucsd.edu/home-pages/wade/tandem.html

Warm Regards,

Claire

Claire Petersky. Now, that's a name I've not heard in a long time. A
long time...

--

Paul D Oosterhout
I work for SAIC (but I don't speak for SAIC)

Originally Posted by Frank Krygowski[_2_]

On Jul 15, 3:22*am, max wrote:
So i'm seeing 5 articles in the 24 hours since i posted. *Is r.b.m dead? *
Where can i go for tandem advice?


Of course it's not a dead group! This is where monkeys talk about
capitalism and Jesus.

Oh, you wanted to talk bicycles? Well, that's been out of line here
lately. Try rec.bicycles.tech. The forces of obnoxiousness haven't
quite succeeded in killing that group.

Yet.

- Frank Krygowski

I also think so.