|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Ed Dolan
Edward Dolan wrote:
Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls for. We are not originators of posts by and large. I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him. JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR. For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,40 8,796th time, Ed Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom. Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy. Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I posted anything. Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me. Yawn -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia “fdlagjaesgtp4epsadvdsajvadsvadjvdxzjvodjvof adsgvogjvoasjcaoivor6udfda0tvuojdxvosdotvfl” – Ed Dolan |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Ed Dolan
Edward Dolan wrote:
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls for. We are not originators of posts by and large. I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him. JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR. For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,40 8,796th time, Ed Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom. I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. Jim McNamara posted the identity [1] of of Johnny NoCom a while back. The wife of the real Johnny NoCom first ride on a lowracer was on my red Sunset. Ed Gin's wife has never ridden my Sunset. Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy. Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I posted anything. So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR? Actually, the group was started by this guy: http://www.bikeroute.com/MartinKrieg.php. Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me. Yawn Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. Well, complaining about trolls does no good, but only encourages the troll. Condemnation only works on people who care. [1] Jim did not post the name, but it is clear to who he was referring to. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia “the bacteria people tuned in-as to bioengineering at the correct wave Point” - gene daniels |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Tom Sherman
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: "Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls for. We are not originators of posts by and large. I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him. JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR. For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,40 8,796th time, Ed Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom. I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. Jim McNamara posted the identity [1] of of Johnny NoCom a while back. The wife of the real Johnny NoCom first ride on a lowracer was on my red Sunset. Ed Gin's wife has never ridden my Sunset. It is irrelevant who Ed Gin was or was not. He has become the bête noir for what destroyed this newsgroup. He did post to ARBR from time to time, so he had plenty of opportunity to say who and what he was. By the way, I did not mind the boasting from Johnny NoCom about the world's fastest recumbent. It was the name calling that got to me. Also, although JimmyMac is a pain in the ass, I did not like the way he was being slandered by Ed Gin. Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy. Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I posted anything. So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR? Actually, the group was started by this guy: http://www.bikeroute.com/MartinKrieg.php. A real nut case for sure! Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me. Yawn Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. Well, complaining about trolls does no good, but only encourages the troll. Condemnation only works on people who care. No, I think a little input from you would have made all the difference. I even asked you to make that input, but you refused. [1] Jim did not post the name, but it is clear to who he was referring to. Not clear to me at all! Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Ed Dolan
Edward Dolan wrote:
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: "Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls for. We are not originators of posts by and large. I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him. JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR. For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,40 8,796th time, Ed Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom. I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. Jim McNamara posted the identity [1] of of Johnny NoCom a while back. The wife of the real Johnny NoCom first ride on a lowracer was on my red Sunset. Ed Gin's wife has never ridden my Sunset. It is irrelevant who Ed Gin was or was not. He has become the bête noir for what destroyed this newsgroup. He did post to ARBR from time to time, so he had plenty of opportunity to say who and what he was. Ed Gin wrote that he was not Johny NoCom. By the way, I did not mind the boasting from Johnny NoCom about the world's fastest recumbent. It was the name calling that got to me. Also, although JimmyMac is a pain in the ass, I did not like the way he was being slandered by Ed Gin. Well, did not Jim respond in kind? Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy. Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I posted anything. So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR? Actually, the group was started by this guy: http://www.bikeroute.com/MartinKrieg.php. A real nut case for sure! Martin did start several flame wars by cross-posting about recumbents, which infuriated Cletus Lee. Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me. Yawn Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. Well, complaining about trolls does no good, but only encourages the troll. Condemnation only works on people who care. No, I think a little input from you would have made all the difference. I even asked you to make that input, but you refused. And the episode passed, no? [1] Jim did not post the name, but it is clear to who he was referring to. Not clear to me at all! Indeed! Without the right keywords it would be hard to search, but only one person fits the description Jim gave of the real Johnny NoCom. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia “fdlagjaesgtp4epsadvdsajvadsvadjvdxzjvodjvof adsgvogjvoasjcaoivor6udfda0tvuojdxvosdotvfl” – Ed Dolan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Ed Dolan
On Sep 24, 7:16*pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls for. We are not originators of posts by and large. I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him. JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR. For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,40 8,796th time, Ed Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom. I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. The same JimmyMac thatyou have fallaciously accused of aiding and abbeting Ed Gin? The conundrum continues. If you mean what you say thaen here this. Toe Sherman is right. Ed Gin was not Johnny Nocom. Several contributors (maybe enve Ed Gin himself) comprised that persona, the primary one of whom no longer resides in the Chicago area, but was an instrumental Monkey Ilalnder and Highracers Suck blog asshole and that is all the clues that you will ever get from me but I know who he is as well. Most posts were through a single conduit and if he is reading this, he knows that I know who he is, but as much as I am opposed to his role, I will not reveal who he is, but he is not Ed Gin and not matter how many times you repeat your unsubstantiated nonsense, it is no more tru or valid than it was with its first utterance. Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy. Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I posted anything. So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR? Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other virtues possible. It was a total *no brainer to know how to respond to the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me. Yawn Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. This is a public service announcement. Ed Dolan has neither been employed for the purpose nor does he speak on my behalf. What JimmyMac knows is that Ed Dolan is an equal opportunity offender whose sole purpose is to aggravate not to enlighten. The bottom line is that Ed Dolan is full of ****. Everyone knows he's full of **** Ed Dolan is aware that everyone knows he's full of ****. As imperceptive as he is, even Ed Dolan knows he's full of ****. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Tom Sherman
"Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: "Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: "Tom Sherman" wrote in message ... Edward Dolan wrote: Tom Sherman and I are both essentially responders. We know how to answer others with either information or put downs, whatever the occasion calls for. We are not originators of posts by and large. I understood Ed Gin from his very first post to ARBR. He was clearly a criminal scum bag of the worst sort and that is how I reacted to him. JimmyMac was a poor lost soul who did not have a clue about how to treat criminal human trash like Ed Gin. However, I do not hold him nearly as culpable as I do Tom Sherman. Why? Because Tom Sherman is intelligent and yet he stood by silently and let the criminal vandal troll destroy ARBR. For the 494,984,187,198,498,978,971,749,654,498,198,065,40 8,796th time, Ed Gin is NOT Johnny NoCom. I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. Jim McNamara posted the identity [1] of of Johnny NoCom a while back. The wife of the real Johnny NoCom first ride on a lowracer was on my red Sunset. Ed Gin's wife has never ridden my Sunset. It is irrelevant who Ed Gin was or was not. He has become the bête noir for what destroyed this newsgroup. He did post to ARBR from time to time, so he had plenty of opportunity to say who and what he was. Ed Gin wrote that he was not Johny NoCom. I never saw that. By the way, I did not mind the boasting from Johnny NoCom about the world's fastest recumbent. It was the name calling that got to me. Also, although JimmyMac is a pain in the ass, I did not like the way he was being slandered by Ed Gin. Well, did not Jim respond in kind? No, he did not, and that was what drove me crazy. He remonstrated with the crazy ******* instead of telling him to go to Hell. Tom Sherman was the mainstay of this newsgroup from the beginning as far as I could tell. It was up to him to defend this newsgroup, but instead he took a powder. The posts between Ed Gin and myself quickly resorted to nothing but the most vile name calling. The only one who could have brought some order to the insanity was Tom Sherman. I simply do not understand such cowardice in the face of the enemy. Actually, alt.rec.bicycles.recumbent was around for several years before I posted anything. So what is a few years in the long and dishonorable history of ARBR? Actually, the group was started by this guy: http://www.bikeroute.com/MartinKrieg.php. A real nut case for sure! Martin did start several flame wars by cross-posting about recumbents, which infuriated Cletus Lee. I cross-post where you are concerned because you are well known on most of the cycling newsgroups. I feel that everyone should know all about you, not just what you choose to tell them. I wish Cletus Lee was still here so I could kick his dumb ass. Courage is the greatest of all the virtues because it makes all the other virtues possible. It was a total no brainer to know how to respond to the criminal vandal troll Ed Gin and yet Tom Sherman did not care enough to respond. That is why he is an enigma - at least to me. Yawn Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. Well, complaining about trolls does no good, but only encourages the troll. Condemnation only works on people who care. No, I think a little input from you would have made all the difference. I even asked you to make that input, but you refused. And the episode passed, no? It has almost passed, except when I don't see any posts to ARBR. Then I resurrect it to get a rise out of the usual suspects. [1] Jim did not post the name, but it is clear to who [whom] he was referring[.] to. Not clear to me at all! Indeed! Without the right keywords it would be hard to search, but only one person fits the description Jim gave of the real Johnny NoCom. And who would that be? Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Tom Sherman
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Sep 24, 7:16 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. The same JimmyMac that you have fallaciously accused of aiding and abbeting Ed Gin? The conundrum continues. If you mean what you say thaen here this. Tom Sherman is right. Ed Gin was not Johnny Nocom. Several contributors (maybe enve Ed Gin himself) comprised that persona, the primary one of whom no longer resides in the Chicago area, but was an instrumental Monkey Ilalnder and Highracers Suck blog asshole and that is all the clues that you will ever get from me but I know who he is as well. Most posts were through a single conduit and if he is reading this, he knows that I know who he is, but as much as I am opposed to his role, I will not reveal who he is, but he is not Ed Gin and not matter how many times you repeat your unsubstantiated nonsense, it is no more tru or valid than it was with its first utterance. Well, if Ed Gin was not the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR, then I would like to know who it was. I was led to believe by you and several others at the time that it was in fact Ed Gin. [...] Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. This is a public service announcement. Ed Dolan has neither been employed for the purpose nor does he speak on my behalf. What JimmyMac knows is that Ed Dolan is an equal opportunity offender whose sole purpose is to aggravate not to enlighten. The bottom line is that Ed Dolan is full of ****. Everyone knows he's full of **** Ed Dolan is aware that everyone knows he's full of ****. As imperceptive as he is, even Ed Dolan knows he's full of ****. The only one on this newsgroup that is full of **** is JimmyMac. He proves it by his stalking behavior. I have too much pride to ever stalk anyone like he does, but I guess when you are born of low parentage like him that pride does not enter into it. Chicago is full of trash people. It is a toilet for the entire Midwest. Hence all the references to **** by JimmyMac. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Tom Sherman
On Sep 25, 12:29*am, "Edward Dolan" wrote:
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Sep 24, 7:16 pm, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] I don't believe it and I never will! JimmyMac is the expert on Ed Gin, not you. The same JimmyMac that you have fallaciously accused of aiding and abbeting Ed Gin? *The conundrum continues. *If you mean what you say thaen here this. *Tom Sherman is right. *Ed Gin was not Johnny Nocom. Several contributors (maybe enve Ed Gin himself) comprised that persona, the primary one of whom no longer resides in the Chicago area, but was an instrumental Monkey Isalnder and Highracers Suck blog asshole and that is all the clues that you will ever get from me but I know who he is as well. *Most posts were through a single conduit and if he is reading this, he knows that I know who he is, but as much as I am opposed to his role, I will not reveal who he is, but he is not Ed Gin and not matter how many times you repeat your unsubstantiated nonsense, it is no more tru or valid than it was with its first utterance. Well, if Ed Gin was not the criminal vandal troll who destroyed ARBR, then I would like to know who it was. I was led to believe by you and several others at the time that it was in fact Ed Gin. [...] If ARBR were destroyed you would not be posting a question to which I already basically said I would not answer. At the time I believed it was Ed Gin too and he may have been involved, but was hot the primary party nor the main poster. either from wha I now understand. Regardless this is ancient history, so just drop it. already. Yawn away old slumberer. When the chips were down, you were found wanting and you and I both know that. Hells Bells, even JimmyMac knows that. When you are a mainstay of a newsgroup, you are NOT free to take powders when the going gets rough. This is a public service announcement. *Ed Dolan has neither been employed for the purpose nor does he speak on my behalf. *What JimmyMac knows is that Ed Dolan is an equal opportunity offender whose sole purpose is to aggravate not to enlighten. *The bottom line is that Ed Dolan is full of ****. Everyone knows he's full of **** * Ed Dolan is aware that everyone knows he's full of ****. * As imperceptive as he is, even Ed Dolan knows he's full of ****. The only one on this newsgroup that is full of **** is JimmyMac. He proves it by his stalking behavior. I have too much pride to ever stalk anyone like he does, You do .... Tom Sherman. So much for your pride. but I guess when you are born of low parentage like him that pride does not enter into it. Chicago is full of trash people. It is a toilet for the entire Midwest. Hence all the references to **** by JimmyMac. Characteristically. Dolan continues to babble on about that which he knows noting of. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Tom Sherman
"JimmyMac" wrote in message ... On Sep 25, 12:29 am, "Edward Dolan" wrote: [...] but I guess when you are born of low parentage like him [JimmyMac] that pride does not enter into it. Chicago is full of trash people. It is a toilet for the entire Midwest. Hence all the references to **** by JimmyMac. Characteristically[,] . Dolan continues to babble on about that [of] which he knows nothing[.] of. I was once stupid enough to go THROUGH Chicago instead of AROUND it like most sensible folks. The place is a mess, but that is what you get when you allow in all the trash people of the world. I don't know which is worse, Chicago or Detroit? Even Tom Sherman had sense enough to move to Milwaukee. Milwaukee is slightly better than Chicago, but none of the dumps so far mentioned can compare with our lovely Twin Cities of Minnesota. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
The Enigma of Ed Dolan
Edward Dolan wrote:
[...] Indeed! Without the right keywords it would be hard to search, but only one person fits the description Jim gave of the real Johnny NoCom. And who would that be? http://www.laparios.com/fotos0904v/SpiderMonkey.jpg. -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia “the bacteria people tuned in-as to bioengineering at the correct wave Point” - gene daniels |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Enigma of Tom Sherman | JimmyMac | Recumbent Biking | 53 | November 3rd 08 11:44 PM |
The Enigma of Tom Sherman | JimmyMac | Mountain Biking | 50 | November 1st 08 03:00 PM |
The Enigma of Tom Sherman | JimmyMac | Social Issues | 50 | November 1st 08 03:00 PM |