A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Techniques
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 2nd 17, 11:09 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Joerg[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,016
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

My last but one Gatorskin went, side wall damage, the usual. The side
wall on the rear tire looks iffy already and if that blows I'd have no
more spare for it. So it's time to refill the basement stack.
Unfortunately the CST Correre only comes in 700c*23mm. This leaves the
Gatorskin Hardshell with supposedly better side walls but ... the
700c*25 beaded is $48, ouch, too much. To my surprise the foldable is
"only" $39. Why is that?

I don't want the normal Gatorskins anymore because the side walls are
too flimsy.

If anyone knows about another new tire that is very puncture resistant
and low cost that would be nice. Weight does not matter and heavier is
usually better.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
  #2  
Old January 2nd 17, 11:45 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,345
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 3:09:24 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote:
My last but one Gatorskin went, side wall damage, the usual. The side
wall on the rear tire looks iffy already and if that blows I'd have no
more spare for it. So it's time to refill the basement stack.
Unfortunately the CST Correre only comes in 700c*23mm. This leaves the
Gatorskin Hardshell with supposedly better side walls but ... the
700c*25 beaded is $48, ouch, too much. To my surprise the foldable is
"only" $39. Why is that?

I don't want the normal Gatorskins anymore because the side walls are
too flimsy.

If anyone knows about another new tire that is very puncture resistant
and low cost that would be nice. Weight does not matter and heavier is
usually better.


The cost difference is invariably sales driven only. The folding tires should always cost a little more than the steel beads but it's a toss-up.

There are several tires out with reinforced treads but I haven't found any that I like and are cheap.


Specialized Armadilloes cost an arm and a leg and they work better than Gatorskins in my experience.

There is a new tire on the market that sounds just up your alley - MICHELIN PRO4 ENDURANCE TIRE - CLINCHER - you can get them in 23, 25 and 28 mm from Competitive Cyclist for only $25. All of the reviews on them are good but the tire is still new yet.
  #3  
Old January 3rd 17, 12:21 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Joerg[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,016
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

On 2017-01-02 15:45, wrote:
On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 3:09:24 PM UTC-8, Joerg wrote:
My last but one Gatorskin went, side wall damage, the usual. The
side wall on the rear tire looks iffy already and if that blows I'd
have no more spare for it. So it's time to refill the basement
stack. Unfortunately the CST Correre only comes in 700c*23mm. This
leaves the Gatorskin Hardshell with supposedly better side walls
but ... the 700c*25 beaded is $48, ouch, too much. To my surprise
the foldable is "only" $39. Why is that?

I don't want the normal Gatorskins anymore because the side walls
are too flimsy.

If anyone knows about another new tire that is very puncture
resistant and low cost that would be nice. Weight does not matter
and heavier is usually better.


The cost difference is invariably sales driven only. The folding
tires should always cost a little more than the steel beads but it's
a toss-up.

There are several tires out with reinforced treads but I haven't
found any that I like and are cheap.


CST makes the Correre and Conquistare series. However, they haven't
gotten the message yet that 25mm is the usual size these days.


Specialized Armadilloes cost an arm and a leg and they work better
than Gatorskins in my experience.

There is a new tire on the market that sounds just up your alley -
MICHELIN PRO4 ENDURANCE TIRE - CLINCHER - you can get them in 23, 25
and 28 mm from Competitive Cyclist for only $25.



Unfortunately they don't have 25mm.

http://www.competitivecyclist.com/mi...FOQ0UgVElSRQ==

I'd like 28mm but it won't fit in my frame. 23mm is too iffy because of
numerous required offroad stints and the occasional heavy load.

I am also looking at the CST Conquistare which comes in 25mm but
unfortunately only the foldable one has 3-ply all across the sidewalls.
Whether on the MTB or the road bike only about half of my tires make it
to the end (where the surface is waron away) without a side wall giving up.


... All of the reviews
on them are good but the tire is still new yet.



Amazon wants almost $59 for the 25mmm. Yikes!

https://www.amazon.com/Michelin-Pro4...E4O?th=1&psc=1

I don't mind being the test rider if the specs are good. But not at $59.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
  #4  
Old January 3rd 17, 01:38 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Frank Krygowski[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,538
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

On 1/2/2017 7:21 PM, Joerg wrote:


I'd like 28mm but it won't fit in my frame. 23mm is too iffy because of
numerous required offroad stints and the occasional heavy load.


I'm still amazed by the number of bikes that can't accept a 28mm tire.
I see no advantage to building that limitation into a bike.


--
- Frank Krygowski
  #5  
Old January 3rd 17, 02:27 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,345
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

On Monday, January 2, 2017 at 5:38:37 PM UTC-8, Frank Krygowski wrote:
On 1/2/2017 7:21 PM, Joerg wrote:


I'd like 28mm but it won't fit in my frame. 23mm is too iffy because of
numerous required offroad stints and the occasional heavy load.


I'm still amazed by the number of bikes that can't accept a 28mm tire.
I see no advantage to building that limitation into a bike.


Yet another advantage of older steel frames.
  #7  
Old January 3rd 17, 02:46 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
DATAKOLL MARINE RESEARCH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,011
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

tight ? how long are these tires lasting ? divide by cost

buy a new frame for 35-32

you have the wong tire consult Conti...uneeda commuter in 32



  #8  
Old January 3rd 17, 03:33 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Joerg[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,016
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

On 2017-01-02 18:46, DATAKOLL MARINE RESEARCH wrote:
tight ? how long are these tires lasting ? divide by cost


Gatorskins last 2500mi on the rear which is better than the (much lower
cost) Vredesteins I used to ride. But $50 is too much.


buy a new frame for 35-32


Yeah, right, throw everything away and buy new.


you have the wong tire consult Conti...uneeda commuter in 32


Last time I wrote to Conti they didn't even bother to answer.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/
  #9  
Old January 3rd 17, 11:26 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
DATAKOLL MARINE RESEARCH
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,011
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

Yeah, right, throw everything away and buy new.

https://www.google.com/#q=used+tusca...bicycle+frames


used. is super abt cycling we can switch horses n not pay out the nose for it.

if the current ride is susceptible to a gross upgrade in lifestyle with a new (used) bike then **** man go for it.

I doahno narrow tires n rims. 32 Conti TT n Turbos are terrific. Before they died I bought 10 3/8th's 3 rib fresh Kendas...in an armload. ebullient over the road tire

Conti's website is excellent at explaining Conti's line.

No one has time to talk. I wanna ask Hella WTF goes on with the replacement units I have but the answer is find an expert n have him examine your problem. Which is true n I cannah ask for more.





  #10  
Old January 3rd 17, 11:43 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech
Doug Landau
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,424
Default Beaded tires higher cost than folding, why?

On Tuesday, January 3, 2017 at 7:33:28 AM UTC-8, Joerg wrote:
On 2017-01-02 18:46, DATAKOLL MARINE RESEARCH wrote:
tight ? how long are these tires lasting ? divide by cost


Gatorskins last 2500mi on the rear which is better than the (much lower
cost) Vredesteins I used to ride. But $50 is too much.


buy a new frame for 35-32


Yeah, right, throw everything away and buy new.


you have the wong tire consult Conti...uneeda commuter in 32


Last time I wrote to Conti they didn't even bother to answer.

--
Regards, Joerg

http://www.analogconsultants.com/


Your baloney has a first name
It's F-o-r-t-e
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vittoria non-folding tires Coltrane Techniques 3 September 11th 08 09:57 PM
Wire-Beaded Tires on Straight-Sided Rim? question man Techniques 5 May 7th 05 05:51 PM
27 inch folding tires? cheg Techniques 3 August 25th 04 06:31 PM
relative cost/usage between bicycle tires and automobile tires Anonymous Techniques 46 April 7th 04 07:03 PM
beaded, tubeless, folding HELP! davebee UK 8 February 2nd 04 07:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.