|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"Mike Romain" wrote OOPS, they, NASA recanted that study, they said their data was skewed. It was all over the news recently. Nope, sorry. You are confusing an announcement made in the middle of last year that made no practical difference in global temps (recant? Ahahahahahahah) with the latest announcement below. Your Ignorance is Profound. You must be an AmeriKKKan. Wrong. While most scientists agree the planet is warming, the trend does not proceed constantly upward year-by-year. Other factors cause hikes and dips in the generally trajectory of the global temperature chart, which has been mostly trending upward since the beginning of the 20th century. They also haven't explained how Mars has somehow, without our influence, warmed up 'more' than the earth in the same period. The only theory I have heard on that is the sad fact our pollution might actually be giving us a sunscreen slowing down 'global warming' in this latest Solar cycle. That is even one of the 'fixes' proposed, to add more junk to airplane fuel to 'help' make more of this sunscreen. This is from a week long special on the Discovery TV channel. Mike |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
On Apr 14, 10:17 am, Mike Romain wrote:
V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Mike Romain" wrote OOPS, they, NASA recanted that study, they said their data was skewed. It was all over the news recently. Nope, sorry. You are confusing an announcement made in the middle of last year that made no practical difference in global temps (recant? Ahahahahahahah) with the latest announcement below. Your Ignorance is Profound. You must be an AmeriKKKan. Wrong. While most scientists agree the planet is warming, the trend does not proceed constantly upward year-by-year. Other factors cause hikes and dips in the generally trajectory of the global temperature chart, which has been mostly trending upward since the beginning of the 20th century. They also haven't explained how Mars has somehow, without our influence, warmed up 'more' than the earth in the same period. Idiot. They have. Ever try Google? The only theory I have heard on that is the sad fact our pollution might actually be giving us a sunscreen slowing down 'global warming' in this latest Solar cycle. The only theory you've heard is the earth is flat. That is even one of the 'fixes' proposed, to add more junk to airplane fuel to 'help' make more of this sunscreen. This is from a week long special on the Discovery TV channel. Mike |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
On Apr 14, 11:11*am, Lloyd wrote:
On Apr 14, 10:17 am, Mike Romain wrote: V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Mike Romain" wrote OOPS, they, NASA recanted that study, they said their data was skewed.. It was all over the news recently. * Nope, sorry. *You are confusing an announcement made in the middle of last year that made no practical difference in global temps (recant? Ahahahahahahah) with the latest announcement below. * Your Ignorance is Profound. You must be an AmeriKKKan. Wrong. While most scientists agree the planet is warming, the trend does not proceed constantly upward year-by-year. Other factors cause hikes and dips in the generally trajectory of the global temperature chart, which has been mostly trending upward since the beginning of the 20th century. They also haven't explained how Mars has somehow, without our influence, warmed up 'more' than the earth in the same period. Idiot. *They have. *Ever try Google? Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot. Vandeman has been using that same method for years with great success. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
Siskuwihane wrote:
On Apr 14, 11:11 am, Lloyd wrote: Idiot. They have. Ever try Google? Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot. Vandeman has been using that same method for years with great success. You have to consider the source, good ol' Lloyd is a Usenet Troll from way back. He is also a pretend scientist just like Vandeman. Why anyone would be stupid enough to send a kid to a school that Foole 'teaches' at, amazes me. I thought they took him off line years ago for foolishness, guess not. Mike |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
On Apr 13, 5:45*am, "V-for-Vendicar"
wrote: MMMMOOOOOOORRRRRRRRROOOOOOOONNNNNNN "Puppet_Sock" wrote How many months in a winter there Scotty? Socks * On average about 1 to 1.5 months shorter than it used to be. On Mar 16, 9:13 pm, "V-for-Vendicar" wrote: [snip] Winter is 4 months long. So you are down to claiming 2.5 months now? Yes Scotty, you are a moron. Socks |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
V-for-Vendicar wrote:
"Siskuwihane" wrote Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot. Google. 2 seconds Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds Kate Ravilious for National Geographic News April 4, 2007 Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period due to the action of Martian winds, scientists have found. ... Ah yes, it is the 'wind' on Mars and 'pollution' on earth. LOL! What about 'our' wind and all the extra storms 'we' have had in the last 20 years, hmm... Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the solar cycle now would it. Man oh man some folks will believe anything someone trying to make money feeds them. Mike |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
On Apr 15, 10:01 am, Mike Romain wrote:
V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Siskuwihane" wrote Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot. Google. 2 seconds Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds Kate Ravilious for National Geographic News April 4, 2007 Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period due to the action of Martian winds, scientists have found. ... Ah yes, it is the 'wind' on Mars and 'pollution' on earth. LOL! What about 'our' wind and all the extra storms 'we' have had in the last 20 years, hmm... Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the solar cycle now would it. Man oh man some folks will believe anything someone trying to make money feeds them. Mike And some idiots think they know more than scientists, when they really have trouble tying their shoes. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
Lloyd wrote:
On Apr 15, 10:01 am, Mike Romain wrote: V-for-Vendicar wrote: "Siskuwihane" wrote Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot. Google. 2 seconds Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds Kate Ravilious for National Geographic News April 4, 2007 Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period due to the action of Martian winds, scientists have found. ... Ah yes, it is the 'wind' on Mars and 'pollution' on earth. LOL! What about 'our' wind and all the extra storms 'we' have had in the last 20 years, hmm... Now this extra wind wouldn't have anything at all to do with the solar cycle now would it. Man oh man some folks will believe anything someone trying to make money feeds them. Mike And some idiots think they know more than scientists, when they really have trouble tying their shoes. And we feel really bad for you about that too Lloyd. You really should have taken that basket weaving 101 course like you mommy said and maybe you could have caught up. Mike |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
"Mike Romain" wrote They also haven't explained how Mars has somehow, without our influence, warmed up 'more' than the earth in the same period. And Uranus cooling. MMMMMMMMMOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNN |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Envirotards' Alleged "Love of Nature"
"Siskuwihane" wrote Ah yes, what a great way to prove a point, calling someone an idiot. Google. 2 seconds Mars Warming Due to Dust Storms, Study Finds Kate Ravilious for National Geographic News April 4, 2007 Temperatures on Mars have increased slightly over a 20-year period due to the action of Martian winds, scientists have found. .... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
PROOF that Mountain Bikers Aren't Out to "Enjoy Nature" | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 30 | April 17th 07 05:26 AM |
PROOF that Mountain Bikers Aren't Out to "Enjoy Nature" | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 29 | April 17th 07 05:26 AM |
Mountain bikers are out to "experience nature"? Not on your life! | Mike Vandeman | Mountain Biking | 35 | October 12th 06 03:33 PM |
Mountain bikers are out to "experience nature"? Not on your life! | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 34 | October 12th 06 03:33 PM |
So Much for Mountain Biking's Alleged "Health Benefit" | Gary S. | Mountain Biking | 0 | January 16th 06 05:13 PM |