|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it funny when Salt & Wriggler gets in wrong?
On 28/11/2015 22:46, Tom Crispin wrote:
On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 10:31:48 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: On 28/11/2015 15:04, Cycle-Ops wrote: On 28/11/2015 14:50, JNugent wrote: On 28/11/2015 14:15, Tom Crispin wrote: On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 12:19:17 PM UTC, JNugent wrote: On 28/11/2015 10:04, Tom Crispin wrote: On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 9:19:58 AM UTC, Alycidon wrote: On Saturday, 28 November 2015 09:03:08 UTC, Tom Crispin wrote: My opinion: As with nearly everything, cash is the cheapest way to make a van purchase, and large discounts can be negotiated with the dearlership. Leasing is simply idiotic, although an easy way to have a new vehicle. It is just another way money is transferred from the plankwitted to those with more than an ounce of intelligence. Leasing is nearly always a financial blunder. There is another option. Get the mug car company to give you a free deposit. Charge you 0% over 4 years. Pay a modest final sum and it's all yours. http://www.alfaromeo.co.uk/finance-offers/giulietta These offers always exclude the cash discount buyers can negotiate with the dealership. http://broadspeed.com/new_cars/Alfa_Romeo/Giulietta/ Better discounts to those on this commercial website are also available, but showing this to a dealership should give you an automatic £3000 off the most basic model. A finance purchase is infinitely preferable to leasing where you pay your money but have no asset to show for it. Commercial vehicles, after a life of working hard, are usually worth very little. The "asset" - such as it is in those circumstances - can be illusory. A well-used commercial vehicle can be difficult to liquidate, but still needs to be maintained, garaged and kept up to date with MOT, insurance, Road Tax, etc. Trust me. I have little doubt that what you say is true. I also have little doubt that van leasing is more expensive in the long run than an outright purchase. Unlike Plankwit, I am more inclined to value the opinion of consumer advice from Which and similar sources than the sales spiel of a van leasing company. There are other advantages. One of them is that every penny paid to rent a vehicle on a lease is tax deductible. No having to account for depreciation or anything similar. I was saving that for later. When he'd made a bigger fool of himself. Mind you, he hasn't realised his biggest error yet. I doubt he will. No one in their right mind would pay the list price for a Citron Nemo. £11,365 OTR - more like £8,530 OTR http://www.perrys.co.uk/citroen-nemo...r-211829-15013 You would, that was the figure YOU started with, halfwit. BTW, that's not OTR. £8,295 +VAT+RFL+REG That's your second biggest **** up. Still can't work out what your biggest **** up is yet? -- Dave Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling. |
Ads |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it funny when Salt & Wriggler gets in wrong?
On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 10:51:57 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote:
No one in their right mind would pay the list price for a Citron Nemo. £11,365 OTR - more like £8,530 OTR http://www.perrys.co.uk/citroen-nemo...r-211829-15013 You would, that was the figure YOU started with, halfwit. BTW, that's not OTR. Liar - I started by saying no one in their right mind would pay the list price. The figure I started with was "about £9,000". https://groups.google.com/forum/?hl=...E/2KD6XsFVCQAJ £8,295 +VAT+RFL+REG That's your second biggest **** up. Still can't work out what your biggest **** up is yet? -- Dave Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful?
On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 01:19:54 -0800 (PST), Alycidon wrote:
On Saturday, 28 November 2015 09:03:08 UTC, Tom Crispin wrote: My opinion: As with nearly everything, cash is the cheapest way to make a van purchase, and large discounts can be negotiated with the dearlership. Leasing is simply idiotic, although an easy way to have a new vehicle. It is just another way money is transferred from the plankwitted to those with more than an ounce of intelligence. Leasing is nearly always a financial blunder. There is another option. Get the mug car company to give you a free deposit. Charge you 0% over 4 years. Pay a modest final sum and it's all yours. http://www.alfaromeo.co.uk/finance-offers/giulietta Oh - have the windscreen wipers gone again - are you getting a new one? Don't forget to get it serviced before you go on the Vindaloo tour this next year; it would be a bummer if it broke down. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful when Salt & Wriggler wriggles?
"Cycle-Ops" wrote in message ... On 28/11/2015 22:12, Tom Crispin wrote: On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 6:56:31 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: Question 3 gets to the crux of the matter: http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/blogs...inance-how-dec ===== 3 Do you need to obtain finance to obtain the car? If no, proceed no further and buy a car with cash. ===== Plankwit has just downsized his home, and, unless he squandered the equity released on something else, should have had sufficient cash to buy outright. I did indeed. So why didn't he? It is quite clearly the cheapest overall option. Because my experienced, qualified, chartered accountant advised me that it isn't the cheapest option. I think his advice overrides the opinion of a ****wit like you who can't handle simple 'sums'. As you have demonstrated in your silly calculations for a 72 month lease. So, your super dooper accountant overrides all the best *free* advice on offer on the Internet? Why pay someone to give you false information? It must be true, it's on the internet. Just how ****ing stupid are you? He doesn't give false information, halfwit. Do you actually know what a chartered accountant is? He wouldn't understand. The old maxim applies: He who does his own accounts, has a fool for an accountant. |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful?
"Tom Crispin" wrote in message ... On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 6:56:31 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: Question 3 gets to the crux of the matter: http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/blogs...inance-how-dec ===== 3 Do you need to obtain finance to obtain the car? If no, proceed no further and buy a car with cash. ===== Plankwit has just downsized his home, and, unless he squandered the equity released on something else, should have had sufficient cash to buy outright. I did indeed. So why didn't he? It is quite clearly the cheapest overall option. Because my experienced, qualified, chartered accountant advised me that it isn't the cheapest option. I think his advice overrides the opinion of a ****wit like you who can't handle simple 'sums'. As you have demonstrated in your silly calculations for a 72 month lease. So, your super dooper accountant overrides all the best *free* advice on offer on the Internet? Why pay someone to give you false information? And everything on the internet is true, isn't it?... In this life, once it dawns on you that you tend to get exactly what you pay for, everything becomes a lot easier. But then again, as a cyclist you will always go for the cheapest option, so you will always fall into the same old traps. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful?
"Kerr Mudd-John" wrote in message news On Sat, 28 Nov 2015 14:06:42 -0000, Tom Crispin wrote: On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 11:33:34 AM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: On 28/11/2015 09:03, Tom Crispin wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 11:35:47 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: On 27/11/2015 23:20, Tom Crispin wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 8:45:23 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: On 27/11/2015 20:06, Tom Crispin wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 7:07:53 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: When you wind up a group of ****wit cyclists to the point that they all start discussing your new van. And still are! How sad. Liar. You don't own a van. Or were you lying about not owning one. I don't own a van, thicko. So Plankwit leases a van? It finally got through your thick skull into what we laughingly call your brain. Another financial blunder... Oh is it? Perhaps you can explain why? And make a **** of yourself again. Waits for good laugh My opinion: Worth nothing. As with nearly everything, cash is the cheapest way to make a van purchase, and large discounts can be negotiated with the dearlership. An individual cannot negotiate a better discount with a "dearlership" that a multi million pound lease company, you halfwit. Oh - so your handyman business is also a multi million pound lease company? Leasing is simply idiotic, although an easy way to have a new vehicle. It is just another way money is transferred from the plankwitted to those with more than an ounce of intelligence. Which is why 80% of new vehicles are leased? Is everybody else out of step? Jeez - so now you compare your fleet of a single van to British Gas's fleet of vans. Leasing is nearly always a financial blunder. I've snipped all the stuff you Googled and didn't understand properly. That doesn't count as an answer. All you need to consider is depreciation and tax relief. No, Plankwit. All you need to consider is the overall annual cost of leasing compared with the overall annual cost of purchasing. Citron Nemo - typical lease £1,136 + £145 pm Citron Nemo - list price £11,365 Total cost after 72 months... Lease car: £11,576 paid. Purchase car: £11,365 paid less equity in van. You are a special kind of stupid. You need to get yourself an accountant before you go skint. Have a read here... http://www.edmunds.com/car-buying/sh...-your-car.html Come back if you understand what you have read. Why are trying to help him? Leave him to his own devices. Where did you get the impression he's trying to help him? If you believe that, then you are as silly as Crispin. |
#77
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful?
"Phil W Lee" wrote in message ... Tom Crispin considered Fri, 27 Nov 2015 15:20:43 -0800 (PST) the perfect time to write: On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 8:45:23 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: On 27/11/2015 20:06, Tom Crispin wrote: On Friday, November 27, 2015 at 7:07:53 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: When you wind up a group of ****wit cyclists to the point that they all start discussing your new van. And still are! How sad. Liar. You don't own a van. Or were you lying about not owning one. I don't own a van, thicko. So Plankwit leases a van? Another financial blunder... Possibly not, if he is as hard on vans as he is on the English language. Have you managed to find an example of where a clear case of manslaughter was judged to be murder yet? You've had a more than enough time to find one... Perhaps I'd better not hold my breath. |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful when Salt & Wriggler wriggles?
On 29/11/2015 01:56, Tarcap wrote:
"Cycle-Ops" wrote in message ... On 28/11/2015 22:12, Tom Crispin wrote: On Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 6:56:31 PM UTC, Cycle-Ops wrote: Question 3 gets to the crux of the matter: http://www.accountingweb.co.uk/blogs...inance-how-dec ===== 3 Do you need to obtain finance to obtain the car? If no, proceed no further and buy a car with cash. ===== Plankwit has just downsized his home, and, unless he squandered the equity released on something else, should have had sufficient cash to buy outright. I did indeed. So why didn't he? It is quite clearly the cheapest overall option. Because my experienced, qualified, chartered accountant advised me that it isn't the cheapest option. I think his advice overrides the opinion of a ****wit like you who can't handle simple 'sums'. As you have demonstrated in your silly calculations for a 72 month lease. So, your super dooper accountant overrides all the best *free* advice on offer on the Internet? Why pay someone to give you false information? It must be true, it's on the internet. Just how ****ing stupid are you? He doesn't give false information, halfwit. Do you actually know what a chartered accountant is? He wouldn't understand. The old maxim applies: He who does his own accounts, has a fool for an accountant. "The old maxim applies: He who does his own accounts, has a fool for an accountant." I like that. Certainly applies to Salt & Wriggler. -- Dave Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling. |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful?
On 28/11/2015 19:05, Mr Pounder Esquire wrote:
Cycle-Ops wrote: On 28/11/2015 17:54, Tom Crispin wrote: Plankwit has just downsized his home, and, unless he squandered the equity released on something else, should have had sufficient cash to buy outright. So why didn't he? It is quite clearly the cheapest overall option. Have you checked to see if you can get finance for some plastic surgery for your butt ugly wife? Or bleach for the brat? Reminds me of a joke; Woman with baby gets on a bus the driver says "that's the ugliest baby I've ever seen". The woman bursts into tears and sits down at the back. A bloke next to her asks what the matter is. "The driver upset me" The bloke says "you go back and insist he appologises. I'll look after the monkey!" -- Dave Dedicated to finding a cure for cycling. |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
Isn't it wonderful?
On Fri, 27 Nov 2015 19:07:52 +0000, Cycle-Ops
wrote: When you wind up a group of ****wit cyclists to the point that they all start discussing your new van. Ha ha ha ha! What a sad bunch of ******s!! I must admit I have never seen anyone as utterly sad as Cripin is with his posts recently What's worse - he just does not get it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cycling increases in popularity? | David Lang | UK | 1 | August 18th 15 10:28 AM |
Popularity of cycling | Tarcap | UK | 4 | June 16th 15 10:04 AM |
Popularity of Cycling. | The Medway Handyman[_4_] | UK | 1 | May 18th 15 10:06 AM |
Cycling gaining in popularity in Qatar. | atriage[_4_] | Racing | 4 | February 7th 13 05:34 AM |
Unicycle Popularity | Beener | Unicycling | 3 | December 9th 03 11:15 PM |