|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of spam
(if any) the supplied email addy generates. Sorry for taking up your time. G. gdstestingnews at yahoo dot com dot au |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
On Sat, 10 Jul 2004 17:59:29 +0930, GDS wrote:
Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of spam (if any) the supplied email addy generates. You'll get bugger-all posting in that manner, probably none. The bulk of the address harvesting comes from the headers to the article, particularly the Reply-To: field. -kt -- Kingsley Turner, (mailto: ) http://MadDogsBreakfast.com/ABFAQ - news:aus.bicycle Frequenly Asked Questions |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
"GDS" wrote in message
Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of spam (if any) the supplied email addy generates. Sorry for taking up your time. There are test groups for testing. Use alt.test next time. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom Poster" argument.
How is it better to have no choice but to scroll through comments you've already read ? Click on message, scroll, scroll, scroll. Seems completely illogical to me. *Top posting because it's logical* -- Tony ISH Remove the fish to reply --= This is a fish anti-spam device =-- `·.¸.·´¯`·...¸((((º "DRS" wrote in message ... "GDS" wrote in message Like I said, please feel free to ignore this post as it's for my own curiosity. I just want to see the amount of spam (if any) the supplied email addy generates. Sorry for taking up your time. There are test groups for testing. Use alt.test next time. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
"((((º" wrote in message
I really don't understand all this "Top Poster" "Bottom Poster" argument. Like you don't already know, troll. Bottom vs. top posting and quotation style on Usenet http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/usenet/brox.html Why is Bottom-posting better than Top-posting http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/gey_stv0.htm http://www.fscked.co.uk/writing/top-posting-cuss.html -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
"((((º" wrote in message
Thanks for the links DRS. Interesting claims people are making about Top and Bottom posting there. Most of which seem illogical to me though unfortunately. I prefer to top post because it is more logical to me, and it is easier to read. It is not logical to put the answer before the question. When you top-post you impose on others by forcing them to reorder the material so it makes sense. That's called selfishness. I've been online for over twelve years now, and bottom posting has always given me the ****s. I just skip a message altogether if someone quotes 3 pages of text before trying to add a single sentence at the bottom. You are confusing two different issues. Not snipping extraneous quoted material is also wrong but it does not justify top-posting. Thanks again for the links, I'll book mark those. Ps. I'm not a Troll. You made the point of using a bait in your signature that some people would nibble on. So by definition your the Troll here since you were the one baiting people, not I. It's not bait. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
Tony,
Iv'e also been posting to newsgroups for over fourteen years & DRS is the only person ever to complain to me about top posting. Yes he is a troll & I also believe top posting makes more sense. I must admit to baiting this poor anally fixated soul, but I can't help it, he is so easy. I have a mental picture of him riding in a peleton on his tricycle with a 50cc motor attached, with a megaphone, ordering other riders to stay in line, don't draft too close, don't use your elbows, then someone giving him a big boot into the nearest ditch, leaving him lying there crying out 'BUT WHY" :-) John L. Sun, 11 Jul 2004 00:41:48 +1000, "\(\(\(\(º" wrote: Thanks for the links DRS. Interesting claims people are making about Top and Bottom posting there. Most of which seem illogical to me though unfortunately. I prefer to top post because it is more logical to me, and it is easier to read. I've been online for over twelve years now, and bottom posting has always given me the ****s. I just skip a message altogether if someone quotes 3 pages of text before trying to add a single sentence at the bottom. Thanks again for the links, I'll book mark those. Ps. I'm not a Troll. You made the point of using a bait in your signature that some people would nibble on. So by definition your the Troll here since you were the one baiting people, not I. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
"John L" wrote in message
Tony, Iv'e also been posting to newsgroups for over fourteen years & DRS is the only person ever to complain to me about top posting. I don't believe you. Yes he is a troll For someone who claims to have been around Usenet so long you don't know what a troll is, because I contribute far too much and have for far too long to ever be considered one. & I also believe top posting makes more sense. But you're just stupid. Putting the answer before the question is always stupid. I must admit to baiting this poor anally fixated soul, but I can't help it, he is so easy. And what does that say about you? I have a mental picture of him riding in a peleton on his tricycle with a 50cc motor attached, with a megaphone, ordering other riders to stay in line, don't draft too close, don't use your elbows, then someone giving him a big boot into the nearest ditch, leaving him lying there crying out 'BUT WHY" :-) You should get a mind before trying mental pictures of anything. -- A: Top-posters. Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Please ignore this post
D R Sole, your replies are getting more pathetic by the minute :-)
You sounf like a small child screaming :"and so are you". Can't you be a little more creative with your responses, or are you already working to the upper limits of you vocabulary & IQ. John L. Sun, 11 Jul 2004 08:35:44 +1000, "DRS" wrote: "John L" wrote in message Tony, Iv'e also been posting to newsgroups for over fourteen years & DRS is the only person ever to complain to me about top posting. I don't believe you. Yes he is a troll For someone who claims to have been around Usenet so long you don't know what a troll is, because I contribute far too much and have for far too long to ever be considered one. & I also believe top posting makes more sense. But you're just stupid. Putting the answer before the question is always stupid. I must admit to baiting this poor anally fixated soul, but I can't help it, he is so easy. And what does that say about you? I have a mental picture of him riding in a peleton on his tricycle with a 50cc motor attached, with a megaphone, ordering other riders to stay in line, don't draft too close, don't use your elbows, then someone giving him a big boot into the nearest ditch, leaving him lying there crying out 'BUT WHY" :-) You should get a mind before trying mental pictures of anything. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTB: Thomson post for parts | Remy | Marketplace | 2 | July 26th 04 05:13 PM |
test post ignore | Zeke | General | 4 | April 26th 04 05:55 AM |
"Liquid Drive" bike prototype at auction | Chalo | Techniques | 87 | December 3rd 03 05:41 AM |
Improving seat clamp and post | joona | Unicycling | 5 | October 3rd 03 03:32 PM |