If Sagan is clean...

atriage wrote:
Nobody was "clean" in the strict sense, however we can take clean to
mean free of EPO and it's derivatives since all other doping methods are
insignificant in that EPO is the only one that converts an above average
rider into a super rider.

That is in the public domain.

On Friday, July 6, 2012 10:26:11 AM UTC-5, atriage wrote:
...then he's the new Merckx, no doubt about that at all.


--

You insufferable ****s - Sagan came in 12 minutes behind the leaders today on a single ****ing hill. DO YOU REALLY STILL ****ING THINK THAT SAGAN IS THE NEXT EDDY MERCKX?

You insufferable cu*nts (retard of the day and atriage) - Sagan lost 12 minutes on a single hill today. Do you really still have your head so far up you ass that you think Sagan is the next EM ?

On 07/07/2012 16:36, Anton Berlin wrote:


You insufferable cu*nts (retard of the day and atriage) - Sagan lost 12 minutes on a single hill today. Do you really still have your head so far up you ass that you think Sagan is the next EM ?

Hey dumbo don't be coy, if you wanna say **** then say ****, you won't hurt our
feelings as nobody gives a flying **** what you think or say.
--

On Jul 7, 12:10*pm, atriage wrote:
On 07/07/2012 16:36, Anton Berlin wrote:



You insufferable cu*nts (retard of the day and atriage) *- Sagan lost 12 minutes on a single hill today. *Do you really still have your head so far up you ass that you think Sagan is the next EM ?

Hey dumbo don't be coy, if you wanna say **** then say ****, you won't hurt our
feelings as nobody gives a flying **** what you think or say.
--

I wrote ****s - google's been blocking sporadically.

But let's focus on how ****ing retarded your original line of thinking
is. A guy wins a few sprints and you predict he's the next EM.

How prescient does that look now ? For a guy that "follows cycling
results" ?

On 07/07/2012 19:04, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Jul 7, 12:10 pm, wrote:
On 07/07/2012 16:36, Anton Berlin wrote:



You insufferable cu*nts (retard of the day and atriage) - Sagan lost 12 minutes on a single hill today. Do you really still have your head so far up you ass that you think Sagan is the next EM ?

Hey dumbo don't be coy, if you wanna say **** then say ****, you won't hurt our
feelings as nobody gives a flying **** what you think or say.
--

I wrote ****s - google's been blocking sporadically.


Maybe they just don't think your posts are worth sending.
--

On Jul 7, 1:13*pm, atriage wrote:
On 07/07/2012 19:04, Anton Berlin wrote:

On Jul 7, 12:10 pm, *wrote:
On 07/07/2012 16:36, Anton Berlin wrote:

You insufferable cu*nts (retard of the day and atriage) *- Sagan lost 12 minutes on a single hill today. *Do you really still have your head so far up you ass that you think Sagan is the next EM ?

Hey dumbo don't be coy, if you wanna say **** then say ****, you won't hurt our
feelings as nobody gives a flying **** what you think or say.
--

I wrote ****s - google's been blocking sporadically.

Maybe they just don't think your posts are worth sending.
--

You're not dealing with reality very well. You made a point and that
point has been refuted by ample evidence. Now you look like some
newbie fool that doesn't know a ****ing iota about cycling nor has a
shred of intellectual honesty to just come out and say - "geez that
was really stupid of me to compare Sagan to Merckx just because he won
a few sprints"

Stick to the point dumbass and man up.

On 07/07/2012 19:19, Anton Berlin wrote:
On Jul 7, 1:13 pm, wrote:
On 07/07/2012 19:04, Anton Berlin wrote:

On Jul 7, 12:10 pm, wrote:
On 07/07/2012 16:36, Anton Berlin wrote:

You insufferable cu*nts (retard of the day and atriage) - Sagan lost 12 minutes on a single hill today. Do you really still have your head so far up you ass that you think Sagan is the next EM ?

Hey dumbo don't be coy, if you wanna say **** then say ****, you won't hurt our
feelings as nobody gives a flying **** what you think or say.
--

I wrote ****s - google's been blocking sporadically.

Maybe they just don't think your posts are worth sending.
--

You're not dealing with reality very well. You made a point and that
point has been refuted by ample evidence.

Since you totally missed the point you can hardly judge whether evidence
supports it or not ****chop.


just come out and say - "geez that
was really stupid of me to compare Sagan to Merckx just because he won
a few sprints"

Stick to the point dumbass and man up.

Here's the point ****chop, Merckx competed in his first TdF at the age of 22,
same age as Sagan is now, Merckx won two stages...Sagan has *already* bettered
that after six stages. Nobody else has ever equalled that or done better at the
age of 22 in their first TdF.
HTH idiot.

--

On 07/07/2012 19:30, atriage wrote:

Here's the point ****chop, Merckx competed in his first TdF at the age of 22,
same age as Sagan is now, Merckx won two stages...Sagan has *already* bettered
that after six stages. Nobody else has ever equalled that or done better at the
age of 22 in their first TdF.
HTH idiot.

Correction it was the Giro that was Merckx first grand tour where he won 2
stages at the age of 22..an easier Grand Tour to win stages in.

--

On 7/7/2012 7:37 AM, RicodJour wrote:
On Jul 6, 12:52 pm, Anton wrote:

He's having a good run - my point is that EM won in multiple ways
while Sagan wins sprints.

A good sprinter doesn't make one a 'cannibal'

No, but winning is winning, and Merckx wouldn't have turned down a
win. It's the must-win attitude, and the ability to back it up that
makes a Terminator or Cannibal.

Sprinting, with a few notable exceptions, is generally a younger guy's
thing - ask Tom Boonen. Sagan has plenty of time to tweak in the wind
tunnel.

R

Jalabert started as a sprinter.

F