|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 20:07:12 GMT, "Leo Lichtman"
wrote: "Phil Lee" wrote: (clip) Anyone done this before? Success? ^^^^^^^^^^^^^How many of you are old enough to remember when car tires had tubes, and "hot patches" were routine? What was the theory there? Vulcanizing patches were made from *partially cured* rubber, and the heat both bonded them in place *and* cured the patch material. They didn't use glue; the rubber itself bonded with the tube. Hot patches for tubeless tires existed for a while, but they were a real hassle to use. I think that the shift away from hot patches for tubes began when it was found that the "chemical patches" for tubeless tires worked just fine on tubes as well. When those became widely available at a reasonable price, there was no longer any justification for putting up with the hassles of applying a vulcanizing patch. I used my last hot patch sometime around 1967, though I didn't toss the clamp into the steel recycling bin until a couple of years ago. Vulcanizing patches had several inherent problems. In damp climates, if the cellophane bag was torn, the combustible charge would hydrate; after that, it wouldn't burn hot enough to cure the patch, though it often would still burn hot enough to make it *appear* that the patch had set. They also had a very definitely limited shelf life in damp climates, even if the cello bag was intact. And, if you were the least bit incautious in using a hot patch, you could burn a hole in the tube just beyond the margin of the patch. I'm told that there are still vulcanizing patches available, but I haven't used one for nearly 40 years now. -- Typoes are a feature, not a bug. Some gardening required to reply via email. Words processed in a facility that contains nuts. |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Werehatrack wrote:
Hot patches for tubeless tires existed for a while, but they were a real hassle to use. I think that the shift away from hot patches for tubes began when it was found that the "chemical patches" for tubeless tires worked just fine on tubes as well. When those became widely available at a reasonable price, there was no longer any justification for putting up with the hassles of applying a vulcanizing patch. Except maybe the really impressive show the hot patches made. Well, impressive at least if you were 10 years old at the time. Mark "I saw 'the show' when I was 10" Janeba |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 18 Aug 2004 06:45:13 GMT, "Phil Lee"
wrote: The idea is just as it seems... melt the rubber to seal the hole. Anyone done this before? Success? Won't work. Butyl won't melt in any useful way. Once a upon a time there were vulcanizing patches that consisted of a "raw" rubber patch that was stuck to the bottom of a drawn steel pan that held a flammable fiber. You'd clamp the patch against the tube, burn the stuff in the pan the heat would vulcanize the rubber and bond it to the tube. As I recall those worked very well, if a bit more involved than the rubber cement approach. Ron |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Rec.Bicycles Frequently Asked Questions Posting Part 1/5 | Mike Iglesias | General | 4 | October 29th 04 07:11 AM |
Patch kits obsolete? | Mike Kruger | General | 27 | July 21st 04 08:05 PM |
ARRRRRGH | Luigi de Guzman | General | 65 | April 30th 04 03:35 AM |
ARRRRRGH | [email protected] | Techniques | 8 | April 29th 04 11:39 PM |