The Shed Thread

On Fri, 08 Jun 2012 21:57:51 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.



You really are one sad *******


--

Bertie Wooster's real name is Tom Crispin.
He uses the name Bertie Wooster so that people involved with
Young Lewisham and Greenwich Cyclists and John Ball primary school
can't see what a tosser he is.

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for labour
alone?
Jesus, are you really a schoolteacher?

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
.. .

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for labour
alone?

In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I am sure he will be delighted to know the answer.

Jesus, are you really a schoolteacher?

"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
.. .

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for
labour
alone?

In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I find it incredible to believe that you have absolutely no understanding of
business - perhaps that's all we should expect from a primary school
teacher. If you believe that making a profit by buying cleverly and then
charging the customer the going rate for the materials is "ripping people
off", then I'm afraid you are in for a bit of a shock. EVERY business does
that, from the local newsagent. your local pub, etc., all the way through
to McAlpines or Kier.
I find it staggering that someone so clueless could be in charge of the up
and coming generation's education.

Are you really. really, a schoolteacher?

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
. ..

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for labour
alone?

In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I am sure he will be delighted to know the answer.

Jesus, are you really a schoolteacher?



I expect you will find that he knew very well why his business was doing so
well. Unfortunately. either you did not *want* to believe that that was the
case - or you could not *understand* why it was.

Either - or even both - will be true.

--

Bertie Wooster's real name is Tom Crispin.
He uses the name Bertie Wooster so that people involved with
Young Lewisham and Greenwich Cyclists and John Ball primary school
can't see what a tosser he is.

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:14:52 +0100, Judith
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for labour
alone?

In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I am sure he will be delighted to know the answer.

Jesus, are you really a schoolteacher?



I expect you will find that he knew very well why his business was doing so
well. Unfortunately. either you did not *want* to believe that that was the
case - or you could not *understand* why it was.

Either - or even both - will be true.

Then why does he keep asking me? He could say why his business model
is so successful, I would either agree or disagree.

What I do know, if the examples he has posted of his work are anything
to go by, it is not quality.

Bertie Wooster's real name is Tom Crispin.
He uses the name Bertie Wooster so that people involved with
Young Lewisham and Greenwich Cyclists and John Ball primary school
can't see what a tosser he is.

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:44:51 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:14:52 +0100, Judith
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
m...

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for labour
alone?

In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I am sure he will be delighted to know the answer.

Jesus, are you really a schoolteacher?



I expect you will find that he knew very well why his business was doing so
well. Unfortunately. either you did not *want* to believe that that was the
case - or you could not *understand* why it was.

Either - or even both - will be true.

Then why does he keep asking me? He could say why his business model
is so successful, I would either agree or disagree.

What I do know, if the examples he has posted of his work are anything
to go by, it is not quality.



Yes - it is truly amazing how all the people who paid for the work are
perfectly happy with the quality of it; and yet ****wits who know nothing about
laying decking or building summerhouses try and criticise from a position of
ignorance.


I cannot understand it.


--

Bertie Wooster's real name is Tom Crispin.
He uses the name Bertie Wooster so that people involved with
Young Lewisham and Greenwich Cyclists and John Ball primary school
can't see what a tosser he is.

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 14:55:52 +0100, Judith
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 13:44:51 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 12:14:52 +0100, Judith
wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jun 2012 09:06:06 +0100, Bertie Wooster
wrote:

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
om...

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat. Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

****** - it's a business - you've either forgotten about (or didn't know
about) profit on materials supplied. Do you think the likes of Sir Robert
McAlpine or Kier construction or any proper business just charges for labour
alone?

In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I am sure he will be delighted to know the answer.

Jesus, are you really a schoolteacher?



I expect you will find that he knew very well why his business was doing so
well. Unfortunately. either you did not *want* to believe that that was the
case - or you could not *understand* why it was.

Either - or even both - will be true.

Then why does he keep asking me? He could say why his business model
is so successful, I would either agree or disagree.

What I do know, if the examples he has posted of his work are anything
to go by, it is not quality.



Yes - it is truly amazing how all the people who paid for the work are
perfectly happy with the quality of it; and yet ****wits who know nothing about
laying decking or building summerhouses try and criticise from a position of
ignorance.

Are you in love?

I cannot understand it.

See above.

--

Bertie Wooster's real name is Tom Crispin.
He uses the name Bertie Wooster so that people involved with
Young Lewisham and Greenwich Cyclists and John Ball primary school
can't see what a tosser he is.

On 09/06/2012 09:50, Partac wrote:


"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Sat, 9 Jun 2012 02:00:06 +0100, "Partac"
wrote:



"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message
...

On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 17:40:10 +0100, Dave - Cyclists VOR
wrote:

A: Over £1,000,000 per year;
B: £500,000 to £1,000,000;
C: £250,000 to £500,000;
D: £100,000 to £250,000;
E: £50,000 to £100,000
F: under £50,000

D: Considerably more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.

At £20 per hour you must have worked between 5000 and 12,500 hours
last year to make £100,000 to £250,000. That's working an average of
between 100 and 250 hours per week (with 2 weeks' holiday).

Oh dear oh dear. Cwispin confirms that he isn't a maths teacher or an
economics teacher.

First of all, I've never claimed to earn £100,000 +, just considerably
more than a failed, middle aged primary school teacher.


But hark! There are but 168 hours in a week. That gives an absolute
upper limit on your earnings on £168,000, provided the £20 per hour
average is about right.

But of course it isn't, but your simple little mind couldn't grasp that.


Methinks thou dost exaggerate thy earnings somewhat.

Since I have never stated what my earnings are - one would have to be
very, very stupid to do that - I can't have exaggerated them can I idiot
boy?

Verily, there is
a whiff of bull**** about thy person.

Verily, there is a whiff of stupidity about yours.



--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University

On 09/06/2012 09:50, Partac wrote:


"Bertie Wooster" wrote in message


In that case, you have solved Plankwit's problem for him. He wanted to
know why his business was doing so well. You have concluded that it is
because he rips his clients off on materials.

I find it incredible to believe that you have absolutely no
understanding of business - perhaps that's all we should expect from a
primary school teacher.

I sometimes wonder who gets him dressed in the mornings.

If you believe that making a profit by buying
cleverly and then charging the customer the going rate for the materials
is "ripping people off", then I'm afraid you are in for a bit of a
shock. EVERY business does that, from the local newsagent. your local
pub, etc., all the way through to McAlpines or Kier.

Cwispin clearly thinks that his local cycle shop charge him cost price
for spare parts when he has his child's toy mended.


I find it staggering that someone so clueless could be in charge of the
up and coming generation's education.

It is a big worry isn't it?

Are you really. really, a schoolteacher?

I have my doubts...

--
Dave - Cyclists VOR. "Many people barely recognise the bicycle as a
legitimate mode of transport; it is either a toy for children or a
vehicle fit only for the poor and/or strange," Dave Horton - Lancaster
University