|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
Ok, so does anyone know what happened?
Last year they erect cyclists warning signs, soon after the add cyclists single file signs and just recently single file signs have been removed. Rumor has it were erected by council responding to a few whining locals but they may have stepped on VicRoads toes as they contradict the road laws. Those signs did cause problems as I had retaliation quite a few times from approaching motorists way back who thought I was riding two abreast where I was actually just passing another cyclists and was approached by a motorists at a coffee shop saying they were erected to remind us cyclists riding two abreast is against the law. Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us getting killed. JoeDe |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
JoeDe wrote:
Ok, so does anyone know what happened? Last year they erect cyclists warning signs, soon after the add cyclists single file signs and just recently single file signs have been removed. Rumor has it were erected by council responding to a few whining locals but they may have stepped on VicRoads toes as they contradict the road laws. Those signs did cause problems as I had retaliation quite a few times from approaching motorists way back who thought I was riding two abreast where I was actually just passing another cyclists and was approached by a motorists at a coffee shop saying they were erected to remind us cyclists riding two abreast is against the law. Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us getting killed. JoeDe There's more than one council involved. The 1 in 20 is divided between the City of Knox at the Boronia/The Basin end, and Yarra Ranges higher up. And if you include Montrose/Kalorama, Maroondah as well. As for advertising, on the (Vic) State Bicycle Committee 20 years ago, we were told that if we wanted to modify road users attitudes, with less than a million dollars we were wasting our time. Correct for inflation and that still holds true. The facts are, a tiny percentage of motorists are actively antagonistic (usually male, aged 17 - 39), whilst a larger percentage simply regard us as an impediment and/or have no idea what the road laws on cyclists are anyway. The relevant authorities claim to be encouraging cycling as an environmentally friendly alternative. The reality is our road system, particularly in outer areas, is just crap, with little or no provision for anything other than the Great God Car. No, in general we don't get killed, as we're experienced and accustomed to this. But 99 per cent around here don't ride to start with, and aren't going to while facilities remain at best derisory. Cheers, Ray |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
"ray" wrote in message u... JoeDe wrote: Ok, so does anyone know what happened? Last year they erect cyclists warning signs, soon after the add cyclists single file signs and just recently single file signs have been removed. Rumor has it were erected by council responding to a few whining locals but they may have stepped on VicRoads toes as they contradict the road laws. Those signs did cause problems as I had retaliation quite a few times from approaching motorists way back who thought I was riding two abreast where I was actually just passing another cyclists and was approached by a motorists at a coffee shop saying they were erected to remind us cyclists riding two abreast is against the law. Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us getting killed. JoeDe There's more than one council involved. The 1 in 20 is divided between the City of Knox at the Boronia/The Basin end, and Yarra Ranges higher up. And if you include Montrose/Kalorama, Maroondah as well. As for advertising, on the (Vic) State Bicycle Committee 20 years ago, we were told that if we wanted to modify road users attitudes, with less than a million dollars we were wasting our time. Correct for inflation and that still holds true. The facts are, a tiny percentage of motorists are actively antagonistic (usually male, aged 17 - 39), whilst a larger percentage simply regard us as an impediment and/or have no idea what the road laws on cyclists are anyway. The relevant authorities claim to be encouraging cycling as an environmentally friendly alternative. The reality is our road system, particularly in outer areas, is just crap, with little or no provision for anything other than the Great God Car. No, in general we don't get killed, as we're experienced and accustomed to this. But 99 per cent around here don't ride to start with, and aren't going to while facilities remain at best derisory. Cheers, Ray Great to hear the signs are no longer there so I'll be copping a smidgin less abuse while riding up and down this road. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
OK, so who made a midnight ride up the 1:20 with a shifting spanner? :-) -- treadly&me |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
treadly& "me" wrote in message ... OK, so who made a midnight ride up the 1:20 with a shifting spanner? :-) -- treadly&me Dunno, but prempted me! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
JoeDe wrote:
Snip Does anyone here think we need a 5 second add on TV letting the public know two abreast is legal? i doubt it'll happen as there's not enough of us getting killed. JoeDe Such ads would only be invested in when "3+ cyclist abreast cameras" become affordable and GovCo has to justify their widespread installation. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 21:52:10 +1100, Sir Lex wrote:
Such ads would only be invested in when "3+ cyclist abreast cameras" become affordable and GovCo has to justify their widespread installation. 3 abreast is legal when some are overtaking. The camera also needs to be placed in the lane - from the side of the road can make 2 look like a lot more. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Cyclists Single File" removed from 1:20
"Aeek" wrote: 3 abreast is legal when some are overtaking. The camera also needs to be placed in the lane - from the side of the road can make 2 look like a lot more. Also would be no use if it's an overtaking driver's view. Riders may be two abreast but just some in a bunch on a different alignment, looking like 3 from behind. I've often thought this is why some drivers get on such a high horse over cyclists two abreast or more. They see a bunch and think that all will be rigidly in line, like a train track. Real world conditions mean this may not always be the case. -- Cheers Peter ~~~ ~ _@ ~~ ~ _- \, ~~ (*)/ (*) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
High-end Single Speed Mt. Bike - Ventana "El Toro" - Super Light! | ClimbTheMtns | Marketplace | 0 | April 30th 06 05:02 PM |
High-end Single Speed Mt. Bike - Ventana "El Toro" - Super Light! | ClimbTheMtns | Marketplace | 0 | April 30th 06 05:00 PM |
For the "Yeah, right" file | Robert Chung | Racing | 13 | August 31st 05 09:37 PM |
For the "Yeah, right" file | Robert Chung | Techniques | 13 | August 31st 05 09:37 PM |