|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is
supposedly a 60cm. I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. All carbon. I have not yet picked up the bike. According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! Does this make *any* difference? If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? I tried bikes that had a more "comfortable" fit such as the Trek Pilot, and I almost bought a Specalized Roubaix. All of these bikes have taller headtubes for a more relaxed ride ((the Orbea head tube is 18.2cm) ). The Orbea is supposedly more "aggressive". This worries me a bit as I'm struggling with comfort and I am really only doing 20- mile casual rides 2-3 times a week. Am I buying the wrong bike? Bike Shop won't let me do a 20-mile ride and I haven't had a chance to cart my Novara over there for one-on-one comparisons. Thanks |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
On Oct 7, 11:52*am, wrote:
I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is supposedly a 60cm. *I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. *Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. *I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. *I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. *All carbon. *I have not yet picked up the bike. *According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. *But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! *Does this make *any* difference? *If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? I tried bikes that had a more "comfortable" fit such as the Trek Pilot, and I almost bought a Specalized Roubaix. *All of these bikes have taller headtubes for a more relaxed ride ((the Orbea head tube is 18.2cm) ). * The Orbea is supposedly more "aggressive". *This worries me a bit as I'm struggling with comfort and I am really only doing 20- mile casual rides 2-3 times a week. *Am I buying the wrong bike? *Bike Shop won't let me do a 20-mile ride and I haven't had a chance to cart my Novara over there for one-on-one comparisons. Thanks There are ways of getting the bars where you need them to be if this is the bike you're happy with. Seat tube size matters little these days, BTW. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
On Oct 7, 12:52*pm, wrote:
I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is supposedly a 60cm. *I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. *Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. *I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. *I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. *All carbon. *I have not yet picked up the bike. *According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. *But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! *Does this make *any* difference? *If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? I tried bikes that had a more "comfortable" fit such as the Trek Pilot, and I almost bought a Specalized Roubaix. *All of these bikes have taller headtubes for a more relaxed ride ((the Orbea head tube is 18.2cm) ). * The Orbea is supposedly more "aggressive". *This worries me a bit as I'm struggling with comfort and I am really only doing 20- mile casual rides 2-3 times a week. *Am I buying the wrong bike? *Bike Shop won't let me do a 20-mile ride and I haven't had a chance to cart my Novara over there for one-on-one comparisons. Thanks the comfortable fit you refer to, is that as you desribe it or the sales literature ? if it is your description then why did you go for the orbea ? 2 or 3 20 mile rides a week is not hardcore, so why did you go for more aggressive geometry, ? further you hand problems are possibly related to your position on the bike, an aggressive position means hands in the drops, which puts more pressure on some of the sensitive nerves in your hand ( ie carpal tunnel syndrom); you may well keep that hand specalists number handy |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
wrote:
I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is supposedly a 60cm. *I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. *Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. *I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. *I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. *All carbon. *I have not yet picked up the bike. *According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. *But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! *Does this make *any* difference? *If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? You left out an important fact: Do the bikes both have horizontal top tubes (or sloping)? That will make a big difference in seat tube length. Sloping top tube frames use longer seat posts to achieve proper fit. And some slope more than others. How did you come to pick the Orbea after trying "a lot of bikes?" I'd be more concerned with fit, type of bike (racing, touring, cross), wheels, tires, and tire clearance, than with it having a carbon frame and components. Art Harris |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
You left out an important fact: Do the bikes both have horizontal top tubes (or sloping)? That will make a big difference in seat tube length. Sloping top tube frames use longer seat posts to achieve proper fit. And some slope more than others. The Novara has a straight top tube. The Orbea somewhat slopes. How did you come to pick the Orbea after trying "a lot of bikes?" One problem is that the bikes I try are often at different stores and it is hard to compare them. I was gonna get a Trek 2.1. But friend steered me away from Tiagra and the salesman told me that a carbon frame would help with my hand discomfort (he said it had a similar effect as wearing thick gel gloves). I was gonna get a Specialized Roubaix 2009, but the bike I tried had a loong stem, so it wasn't terribly comfortable and it is $1850, which is starting to really get pricey. I know the stem can be changed, but it was something I didn't get a chance to evaluate. The salesman for the Orbea swapped in a shorter stem. The bike "spoke to me" I guess. It felt like a sportscar and didn't seem too uncomfortable. Price is at the high-end of what I wanted to spend, but it seems like a decent deal for $1600. The only bike I compared the Orbea to, back-to-back, was a Trek Pilot with its upright riding position. Something wasn't right with it. I guess if I'm only doing 25-mile rides 2-3 times per week, maybe I should just stick with an entry-level Tiagra or Sora-class bike... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
On Oct 8, 11:32*am, wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:52*pm, wrote: I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is supposedly a 60cm. *I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. *Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. *I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. *I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. *All carbon. *I have not yet picked up the bike. *According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. *But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! *Does this make *any* difference? *If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? I tried bikes that had a more "comfortable" fit such as the Trek Pilot, and I almost bought a Specalized Roubaix. *All of these bikes have taller headtubes for a more relaxed ride ((the Orbea head tube is 18.2cm) ). * The Orbea is supposedly more "aggressive". *This worries me a bit as I'm struggling with comfort and I am really only doing 20- mile casual rides 2-3 times a week. *Am I buying the wrong bike? *Bike Shop won't let me do a 20-mile ride and I haven't had a chance to cart my Novara over there for one-on-one comparisons. Thanks the comfortable fit you refer to, is that as you desribe it or the sales literature ? if it is your description then why did you go for the orbea ? 2 or 3 20 mile rides a week is not hardcore, so why did you go for more aggressive geometry, ? further you hand problems are possibly related to your position on the bike, an aggressive position means hands in the drops, which puts more pressure on some of the sensitive nerves in your hand ( ie carpal tunnel syndrom); you may well keep that hand specalists number handy Sales literature and just looking at how their head tubes are taller. The most comfortable bike I've ever tried was a 2003 Trek 5900 with a stem that has quite an angle. So I know that an "aggressive" racing geometry can be made comfortable with the right stem. But the problem is that I realized my existing bike is basically the same length of Top Tube as the Orbea I put money on. So now I'm just reconsidering what I am doing. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
wrote:
The Novara has a straight top tube. *The Orbea somewhat slopes. Aha! That's what I suspected. How did you come to pick the Orbea after trying "a lot of bikes?" One problem is that the bikes I try are often at different stores and it is hard to compare them. I was gonna get a Trek 2.1. *But friend steered me away from Tiagra and the salesman told me that a carbon frame would help with my hand discomfort (he said it had a similar effect as wearing thick gel gloves). I have no first hand experience with Tiagra, but it definitely isn't junk. Maybe lacking in snob appeal. I don't buy the claim that carbon absorbs shock better either. I was gonna get a Specialized Roubaix 2009, but the bike I tried had a loong stem, so it wasn't terribly comfortable and it is $1850, which is starting to really get pricey. *I know the stem can be changed, but it was something I didn't get a chance to evaluate. The salesman for the Orbea swapped in a shorter stem. The bike "spoke to me" I guess. *It felt like a sportscar and didn't seem too uncomfortable. "Didn't seem too uncomfortable" isn't a great testimonial. I hope you're not buying the sizzle instead of the steak *Price is at the high-end of what I wanted to spend, but it seems like a decent deal for $1600. The only bike I compared the Orbea to, back-to-back, was a Trek Pilot with its upright riding position. *Something wasn't right with it. Well, I hope it works out. A good "deal" doesn't ensure an appropriate bike. I guess if I'm only doing 25-mile rides 2-3 times per week, maybe I should just stick with an entry-level Tiagra or Sora-class bike... Or try to get better fit on the Novara. Maybe a shorter or higher stem. A more upright position would help with your hand problems. Art Harris |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
On Oct 8, 3:47*pm, wrote:
On Oct 8, 11:32*am, wrote: On Oct 7, 12:52*pm, wrote: I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is supposedly a 60cm. *I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. *Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. *I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. *I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. *All carbon. *I have not yet picked up the bike. *According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. *But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! *Does this make *any* difference? *If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? I tried bikes that had a more "comfortable" fit such as the Trek Pilot, and I almost bought a Specalized Roubaix. *All of these bikes have taller headtubes for a more relaxed ride ((the Orbea head tube is 18.2cm) ). * The Orbea is supposedly more "aggressive". *This worries me a bit as I'm struggling with comfort and I am really only doing 20- mile casual rides 2-3 times a week. *Am I buying the wrong bike? *Bike Shop won't let me do a 20-mile ride and I haven't had a chance to cart my Novara over there for one-on-one comparisons. Thanks the comfortable fit you refer to, is that as you desribe it or the sales literature ? if it is your description then why did you go for the orbea ? 2 or 3 20 mile rides a week is not hardcore, so why did you go for more aggressive geometry, ? further you hand problems are possibly related to your position on the bike, an aggressive position means hands in the drops, which puts more pressure on some of the sensitive nerves in your hand ( ie carpal tunnel syndrom); you may well keep that hand specalists number handy Sales literature and just looking at how their head tubes are taller. The most comfortable bike I've ever tried was a 2003 Trek 5900 with a stem that has quite an angle. *So I know that an "aggressive" racing geometry can be made comfortable with the right stem. But the problem is that I realized my existing bike is basically the same length of Top Tube as the Orbea I put money on. *So now I'm just reconsidering what I am doing.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - position and comfort are key- can he let you test the bike on rollers in-store ? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Bike Fit question: shorter seat tube with same TT length
On Oct 7, 9:52*am, papagordygra
I'm currently riding a 10-year old Novara Strada bike that is supposedly a 60cm. *I measured the tob tube as 57cm, which is the same as the BB to the center of the top tube. *Head tube measures 20.32cm. It is my first road bike and I always thought it was a bit big. *I even developed a hand problem after riding for a summer (I had to see a hand specialist!). Well after looking, and riding, a lot of bikes I put money down last night on a 57cm 2008 Orbea Onix TDA. *I got it for $1650 + a $50 gift card for accessories. *All carbon. *I have not yet picked up the bike. *According to Orbea's website, the top tube measure 57cm just like my "60cm" Novara. *But the Seat Tube measures 52cm which is 5cm shorter than the Novara with the *same* TT length! *Does this make *any* difference? *If the seat tube is shorter, is raising the seat equivalent? I tried bikes that had a more "comfortable" fit such as the Trek Pilot, and I almost bought a Specalized Roubaix. *All of these bikes have taller headtubes for a more relaxed ride ((the Orbea head tube is 18.2cm) ). * The Orbea is supposedly more "aggressive". *This worries me a bit as I'm struggling with comfort and I am really only doing 20- mile casual rides 2-3 times a week. *Am I buying the wrong bike? *Bike Shop won't let me do a 20-mile ride and I haven't had a chance to cart my Novara over there for one-on-one comparisons. Thanks seat tube length is almost irrelevant. Seat tube angle, seat post setback, head tube length and to a small extent bb height are the important parts in fitting. Also how the t.t. is measured (virtual or actual) on both bikes. that said the right stem and handlebar can make a bike that is good feel great. see a good fitter (likely not the salesman who sold you the bike, no offence but fitting is not something that every salesperson does well.) I have found that almost every orbea needs a diffrent sem unless you are very flexable. good luck johnny |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
mtb frame size question. Virtual top tube 5 cm shorter, how important? | len | General | 4 | May 21st 07 04:20 PM |
Seat tube length??? | wowunicycle | Unicycling | 2 | June 3rd 06 08:22 PM |
WTB: Cross bike, approx 51 seat tube, 53 top tube. | the catfish | Marketplace | 0 | May 8th 05 05:45 PM |
Seat tube reaming question | CEarly | Techniques | 11 | March 4th 05 05:59 AM |
Shorter top tube? | peter | Techniques | 0 | January 13th 05 03:43 PM |