A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » General
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 14th 06, 07:45 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
erasmo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 248
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?

hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)

greetings

--
http://erasmo.r8.org

Ads
  #2  
Old November 14th 06, 07:56 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
gds
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 375
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)

greetings

--
http://erasmo.r8.org


I know of carbon frames with 25,000 miles on them with no problems.

  #3  
Old November 14th 06, 08:48 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
bdbafh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)

greetings

--
http://erasmo.r8.org


Typically, a rack position over the rear wheel requires mounting to
eyelets on the frame.
These eyelets are typically brazed onto a metal frame.
It is not possible to braze eyelets onto a carbon fiber frame.

One work-around when using a carbon fiber frame is to use a clamp-on
rear rack, which attaches to the seatpost.
It is recommended by at least one rack and one seatpost manufacturer
that clamp-on racks not be used with carbon fiber seat posts. An in
expensive substitute aluminium seat post will work just fine.
Some rack/pack units provide smallish panniers integrated with the
rack.

I've used one before (Specialized Roubaix, Topeak MTX rack beam and
bag) with good results but carried additional stuff in a largish
backpack/hydration unit.
The (max) weight limit that I saw described was "20 lbs loading".

hth.

-bdbafh

  #4  
Old November 14th 06, 09:00 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
landotter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,336
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)


A good seat bag or bar bag will be necessary to carry essentials that
aren't on the sag wagon. They tend to not complain about frame
material.

Only drawbacks would be if you're riding at a touring pace, but on a
machine set up to be high zoot race. While very low bars, ultra skinny
saddes and the like are just the thing when your body is being held
up by hard hammering, they can become uncomfortable at less than a full
out pace. May or may not be an issue for you. You'll also want to carry
a spare folding tire unless you managed to squeeze something more
rugged into that frame.

  #5  
Old November 14th 06, 11:38 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
John Forrest Tomlinson
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,564
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?

On 14 Nov 2006 12:48:41 -0800, "bdbafh" wrote:


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)

greetings

--
http://erasmo.r8.org


Typically, a rack position over the rear wheel requires mounting to
eyelets on the frame.


What makes you think the OP is using a rack?
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************
  #6  
Old November 14th 06, 11:59 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
bdbafh
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 232
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


John Forrest Tomlinson wrote:
On 14 Nov 2006 12:48:41 -0800, "bdbafh" wrote:


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)

greetings

--
http://erasmo.r8.org


Typically, a rack position over the rear wheel requires mounting to
eyelets on the frame.


What makes you think the OP is using a rack?
--
JT
****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************


I misread the post.

-bdbafh

  #7  
Old November 15th 06, 02:34 AM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
Qui si parla Campagnolo Qui si parla Campagnolo is offline
Banned
 
First recorded activity by CycleBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,259
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

thank you for any comment :-)

greetings

--
http://erasmo.r8.org


Well made carbon will do just fine.

  #8  
Old November 15th 06, 06:52 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
bfd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 487
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

If money is no object, you may want to consider the Parlee/Cycle
Tournesol carbone. Its designed to use a front rack and/or seatbag and
will take tires as wide as 27mm with fenders. Of course, at $6500, its
definitely not cheap!

http://www.cyclestournesol.com/tlc.htm

  #9  
Old November 15th 06, 09:44 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
landotter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6,336
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


bfd wrote:
erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

If money is no object, you may want to consider the Parlee/Cycle
Tournesol carbone. Its designed to use a front rack and/or seatbag and
will take tires as wide as 27mm with fenders. Of course, at $6500, its
definitely not cheap!


Now that's a carbon bike I like! The price isn't insane considering the
small production, not that I've got that sort of dosh...I like the
fender mounting, the fork crown, and the focus on using the material
for efficiency and comfort, instead of trying to be stupid light. Good
stuff.

  #10  
Old November 15th 06, 10:02 PM posted to rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.misc
bfd
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 487
Default Carbon Frame for non-luggage touring ?


landotter wrote:
bfd wrote:
erasmo wrote:
hi dear Forum:

what do you think about using a Carbon Frame (Benotto Black Jack) for
non-luggage touring (cyclo-tourism) ?

i have read opinions for and against the use of carbon frames in this
kind of cycling, but i would like to ask you if you think a carbon
frame could be reliable (in the long run) up to the task of riding on
road (not trail or MTB) for 100-125 miles/day, but without lugagge
(panniers et al), just the cyclist (i plan to rest at hotels)

If money is no object, you may want to consider the Parlee/Cycle
Tournesol carbone. Its designed to use a front rack and/or seatbag and
will take tires as wide as 27mm with fenders. Of course, at $6500, its
definitely not cheap!


Now that's a carbon bike I like! The price isn't insane considering the
small production, not that I've got that sort of dosh...I like the
fender mounting, the fork crown, and the focus on using the material
for efficiency and comfort, instead of trying to be stupid light. Good
stuff.


Agree. The frame is made by Bob Parlee and along with Craig Calfee and
Nic Crumpton make arguably one of the best carbon fiber frames on the
market. Add in a Wound-Up carbon fork and you have the clearance for
fenders and 25-28mm tires. At 18lbs, it is NOT LIGHT; at least in
comparison with some of the superlight stuff coming out of Taiwan.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
touring frame fitting, 26 or 700c wheels for touring Lee Techniques 13 July 1st 06 09:33 PM
touring with carbon [email protected] Techniques 5 May 19th 06 04:10 PM
Touring France on Tandem - Transporting Luggage JMG Rides 2 April 6th 05 03:50 PM
FA: 2003 GIANT TCR 0 CARBON FRAME, CARBON FORK, CARBON CAGES AND COMPUTER Phil, Squid-in-Training Marketplace 0 January 21st 05 03:07 PM
Steel Frame vs Aluminum Frame w/ Carbon seat stays and carbon fork ydm9 General 6 April 12th 04 09:42 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.