RLJ cyclist almost mows down pedestrian on crossing

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:14:49 +0100, JNugent wrote:

On 18/07/2020 21:03, Simon Mason wrote:
On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 8:48:40 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 20:30:22 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 8:26:51 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Now what if you pass a cyclist at a "safe distance" and the cyclist wobbles closer to you?

It won't matter as you will be at this point here.

https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/uplo...a-car_orig.jpg

I don't give a car that much space, or I'd be off the road. Hint - "space" is the distance between you and them. In that photo there is a car's width between the two objects. That does not happen and cannot happen on a lot of roads when overtaking a car.

Yet that photo is in the Highway Code as the recommended overtaking distance

How do you know?

Or rather, what makes you think you know?

Where in the law is the "recommended distance" expressed in words and
numbers?

British legislation is *not* expressed in cartoons and hieroglyphs.

and your "one foot" is not. If there is not enough space, then you WAIT until there is.

Prove it by citing (a) the legislative source for your claim and (b) the
source for the measurements you claim to "know".

I wonder if he cycles around with an extended tapemeasure?

You know what's great fun, hitting those silly little plastic things some cyclists have stuck out to make you give a larger gap. Hint - they're flexible....

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 9:12:26 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:03:38 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 8:48:40 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 20:30:22 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 8:26:51 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Now what if you pass a cyclist at a "safe distance" and the cyclist wobbles closer to you?

It won't matter as you will be at this point here.

https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/uplo...a-car_orig.jpg

I don't give a car that much space, or I'd be off the road. Hint - "space" is the distance between you and them. In that photo there is a car's width between the two objects. That does not happen and cannot happen on a lot of roads when overtaking a car.

Yet that photo is in the Highway Code as the recommended overtaking distance and your "one foot" is not. If there is not enough space, then you WAIT until there is.

Do you give the space in the photo to a car? If not you're being dangerous to other motorists, and also the highway code must be wrong, since you cannot possibly give that much space to a car, as I've just explained to you but you conveniently ignored.

I give easily that much space to a car as I overtake it as I use the whole overtaking lane on two or three lane roads and the other opposite carriageway on single track roads. So that overtaking photo in the HC is accurate as published.

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 12:30:22 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason, the mentally
deficient troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE and retarded Google groper, blathered
again:

It won't matter as you will be at this point here.

Nope, senile asshole! He's HERE baiting you whenever he wants to bait you,
you brain dead troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE!

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 13:03:38 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason, the mentally
deficient troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE and retarded Google groper, blathered
again:


Yet that photo is in the Highway Code as the recommended overtaking
distance and your "one foot" is not. If there is not enough space, then
you WAIT until there is.

The sociopathic ****** and troll just waits until you will take his next
bait, senile asshole! tsk

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 9:24:00 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You know what's great fun, hitting those silly little plastic things some cyclists have stuck out to make you give a larger gap. Hint - they're flexible....

What is great fun is drivers like you being fined by unmarked police cyclists for passing them closer than the legal 1.5 m.

https://www.hullccnews.co.uk/16/10/2...from-cyclists/

On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 02:38:03 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason, the mentally
deficient troll-feeding senile ASSHOLE and retarded Google groper, blathered
again:


Swearing at the police on cycles is not a good idea, especially if you
have just passed them closer than the legal 1.5 limit.

As YOU will soon learn here, feeding the troll is NO good idea AT ALL, you
dumb senile troll-feeding Google groper! BG

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:24:36 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 9:12:26 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:03:38 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 8:48:40 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 20:30:22 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 8:26:51 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Now what if you pass a cyclist at a "safe distance" and the cyclist wobbles closer to you?

It won't matter as you will be at this point here.

https://www.highwaycodeuk.co.uk/uplo...a-car_orig.jpg

I don't give a car that much space, or I'd be off the road. Hint - "space" is the distance between you and them. In that photo there is a car's width between the two objects. That does not happen and cannot happen on a lot of roads when overtaking a car.

Yet that photo is in the Highway Code as the recommended overtaking distance and your "one foot" is not. If there is not enough space, then you WAIT until there is.

Do you give the space in the photo to a car? If not you're being dangerous to other motorists, and also the highway code must be wrong, since you cannot possibly give that much space to a car, as I've just explained to you but you conveniently ignored.

I give easily that much space to a car as I overtake it as I use the whole overtaking lane on two or three lane roads and the other opposite carriageway on single track roads. So that overtaking photo in the HC is accurate as published.

Bull****. A small road has only enough room for two cars and couple of feet between and either side.

On Sat, 18 Jul 2020 21:28:24 +0100, Simon Mason wrote:

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 9:24:00 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You know what's great fun, hitting those silly little plastic things some cyclists have stuck out to make you give a larger gap. Hint - they're flexible....

What is great fun is drivers like you being fined by unmarked police cyclists for passing them closer than the legal 1.5 m.

https://www.hullccnews.co.uk/16/10/2...from-cyclists/

Why would you need 1.5m? Go out cycling and see just how far you wobble. I do what makes sense, not what's the law.

On Saturday, July 18, 2020 at 10:56:51 PM UTC+1, Commander Kinsey wrote:

Bull****. A small road has only enough room for two cars and couple of feet between and either side.

On a single track country road I will pull over, stop and let oncoming cyclists through. If I am following them, I simply wait behind them until it is safe to give them the 1.5 m berth.

On Sun, 19 Jul 2020 01:56:17 -0700 (PDT), Simon Mason, the notorious
troll-feeding senile asshole, blathered again:


On a single track country road I will pull over

I worry more about your constantly pulling down the Scottish ******'s zip,
senile sucker of troll cock!