|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
American (?) daemon in Australia. Take him back!
On 8/5/2016 9:25 PM, jbeattie wrote:
snip I was one of the original board members of our fear-mongering BTA, and we opposed an MHL, and I still don't think one is necessary. So go make your case, but if you lose, its not armageddon. As for what the photos "pretend" to show, those are typical photos, and actually the percentage wearing helmets is higher on the west side. You get a lower rate on the east side, and downtown I see plenty of the bag dress and Birkenstock set wandering around, helmetless, on their old Varsities, the cycling cap fixie set and the DUII crowd -- and those who just don't want to wear a helmet. We all live together in harmony -- ebony and ivory. When opposing an MHL, proposed by fear-mongers, you have to find a way to counter the testimony of ER physicians, nurses, paramedics, and other well-respected, and well-meaning groups, since they will bury you with anecdotal, empirical, and statistical evidence, and the cost to society. They basically believe that any level of risk that can be reduced, should be reduced, and that it's government's responsibility to mandate this risk reduction. In countries with government sponsored health care there's another incentive for MHLs. On automobiles we ended up with large amounts of safety equipment to reduce the risk of crashes, and to reduce injuries in the event of a crash, and now they think that this should be extended to bicycles. Soon we'll have TPMS on bicycle tires (it can already be done), ABS to prevent front wheel lockup (I've already seen such systems), and maybe an airbag contained in the stem. But this is all equipment that would be provided by the manufacturer, so it's not the same as mandating protection worn on the driver's or rider's body. I like the idea of leveraging the bike share issue as a reason to not implement MHLs. What was done for MHLs for motorcycles in at least one state, was to eliminate the helmet requirement but only if the rider had proof of medical insurance. On the surface this sounds reasonable, but how far do you take this? Only allow people with medical insurance to eat unhealthy foods? The wrong way to fight MHLs is to fabricate stories about how MHLs reduce cycling levels (something that has never shown to be true), and to claim that these non-existent reductions in cycling will have negative side effects. Don't think that those making the decisions on these laws are stupid enough to believe that kind of nonsense. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
American (?) daemon in Australia. Take him back!
On 8/5/2016 9:25 PM, jbeattie wrote:
snip I was one of the original board members of our fear-mongering BTA, and we opposed an MHL, and I still don't think one is necessary. So go make your case, but if you lose, its not armageddon. As for what the photos "pretend" to show, those are typical photos, and actually the percentage wearing helmets is higher on the west side. You get a lower rate on the east side, and downtown I see plenty of the bag dress and Birkenstock set wandering around, helmetless, on their old Varsities, the cycling cap fixie set and the DUII crowd -- and those who just don't want to wear a helmet. We all live together in harmony -- ebony and ivory. -- Jay Beattie. What should be done is to develop a smart phone app that records the rider, that decides to ride helmetless, consent to the risk of that behavior after answering a series of questions. There are already apps that record the consent to have sex after answering a series of questions. "What type of protection are you using?" "Do you understand the risks?" A video of the consent is stored for seven years. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
American (?) daemon in Australia. Take him back!
On 8/6/2016 11:37 AM, sms wrote:
What should be done is to develop a smart phone app that records the rider, that decides to ride helmetless, consent to the risk of that behavior after answering a series of questions. Do you propose such an app be used only by bicyclists, who comprise 0.6% of America's brain injury deaths? It seems it would be much more productive to promote it for the other 99.4%... .... but I guess that doesn't sync with the "Bicycling is dangerous!!!" meme. -- - Frank Krygowski |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
We arrived back in Australia | [email protected] | Australia | 3 | October 5th 07 12:16 PM |
coming back from downtime - sore left back side - cause? | Paul | General | 1 | May 18th 07 06:45 PM |
places to buy in australia (or to ship to australia) | janey | Unicycling | 12 | December 31st 05 10:30 AM |
Back to Back Epic Uni Rides | aspenmike | Unicycling | 11 | August 17th 05 05:23 AM |
BACK NEXT MONTH IN AUSTRALIA !_d | malcomm | Australia | 0 | December 25th 04 10:36 PM |