|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
|
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On Jun 13, 2:56*pm, Michael wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...sh-doping-char... The details: http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...arging0613.pdf DR |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On 14/06/2012 01:25, DirtRoadie wrote:
On Jun 13, 2:56 pm, wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...sh-doping-char... The details: http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...arging0613.pdf Now that is what you call a *comprehensive* rap sheet. -- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:42:56 UTC-4, atriage wrote:
On 14/06/2012 01:25, DirtRoadie wrote: On Jun 13, 2:56 pm, wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...sh-doping-char... The details: http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...arging0613.pdf Now that is what you call a *comprehensive* rap sheet. -- Thanks. That's a good, old-fashioned conspiracy. How easy is it to intimidate people in the cycling world? Do they really have so few career options outside the cycling industry that it was realistic to expect them to keep their mouths shut forever? The long-term strategy of this conspiracy doesn't make sense unless the conspirators just wanted to buy enough time to loot the system. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On 6/14/2012 9:39 AM, Mark wrote:
On Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:42:56 UTC-4, atriage wrote: On 14/06/2012 01:25, DirtRoadie wrote: On Jun 13, 2:56 pm, wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...sh-doping-char... The details: http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...arging0613.pdf Now that is what you call a *comprehensive* rap sheet. -- Thanks. That's a good, old-fashioned conspiracy. How easy is it to intimidate people in the cycling world? Do they really have so few career options outside the cycling industry that it was realistic to expect them to keep their mouths shut forever? The long-term strategy of this conspiracy doesn't make sense unless the conspirators just wanted to buy enough time to loot the system. It seems heavy on he said/she said. The re-analyzed 1999 EPO positives are missing. They do list the 2001 Swiss EPO positive that the guy responsible is on record as saying is not a positive. They are claiming evidence of 2009-10 blood transfusions, which wouldn't threaten any of his Tour victories. Looks to be quite a 3 ring circus. F |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On Jun 14, 10:21*am, Fred Flintstein
wrote: On 6/14/2012 9:39 AM, Mark wrote: On Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:42:56 UTC-4, atriage *wrote: On 14/06/2012 01:25, DirtRoadie wrote: On Jun 13, 2:56 pm, * wrote: http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...sh-doping-char.... The details: http://online.wsj.com/public/resourc...ongcharging061.... Now that is what you call a *comprehensive* rap sheet. -- Thanks. That's a good, old-fashioned conspiracy. How easy is it to intimidate people in the cycling world? *Do they really have so few career options outside the cycling industry that it was realistic to expect them to keep their mouths shut forever? The long-term strategy of this conspiracy doesn't make sense unless the conspirators just wanted to buy enough time to loot the system. It seems heavy on he said/she said. The re-analyzed 1999 EPO positives are missing. They do list the 2001 Swiss EPO positive that the guy responsible is on record as saying is not a positive. They are claiming evidence of 2009-10 blood transfusions, which wouldn't threaten any of his Tour victories. Looks to be quite a 3 ring circus. And whatever may have occurred previously, it's somewhat hard to imagine that he was still "enhanced" in 2009/2010. I thought that comeback was partially for the purpose of being able to lay to rest earlier doping allegations by competing clean (and performing credibly), taking advantage of the ostensibly cleaner peloton at that time. It's a theory. In contrast to other cases where the science of analytical findings is challenged, I'm not quite sure how he addresses eyewitness testimony. It probably won't be sufficient to merely say they are lying. And the ploy of "But, I've done great things as an anti-cancer crusader," even to the extent it may be true, is not relevant. DR |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
Looks to be quite a 3 ring circus. In contrast to other cases where the science of analytical findings is challenged, I'm not quite sure how he addresses eyewitness testimony. It probably won't be sufficient to merely say they are lying. Floyd Tyler If Armstrong forfeits any Tour wins who get the win Ulrich & Pantani. There is enough evidence to make anybody suspicious but give me a break how long has this gone on & at what cost? Surely there are better uses of peoples time any money. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On 14/06/2012 21:37, steve wrote:
Looks to be quite a 3 ring circus. In contrast to other cases where the science of analytical findings is challenged, I'm not quite sure how he addresses eyewitness testimony. It probably won't be sufficient to merely say they are lying. Floyd Tyler If Armstrong forfeits any Tour wins who get the win Ulrich& Pantani. Yeah they're gonna dig him up and nail a yellow shirt on him. -- |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
On Wednesday, June 13, 2012 4:56:25 PM UTC-4, Michael wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...PaV_story.html Which of the other respondents will be the first to turn on Armstrong? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Lance again
.On Jun 13, 2:56*pm, Michael wrote:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/lance-...sh-doping-char... Most of the charges are flimsy. The USDA accusation of blood manipulation is the one that Lance has to be concerned about, They also claimed that the tax doctors were found with . needles and other thing such as measuring devices were found. It is not against UCI regulations to possess these. They are doctors after all. There's new rules that regulate injections. This is a good thing. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lance and the rest - why Lance? | Anton Berlin | Racing | 22 | July 15th 10 10:20 AM |
Lance Rentzel....Not Lance Alworth | Texan in Belgium | Racing | 2 | August 12th 09 06:45 PM |
From Lance to Kunich (Was: Lance to Landis) | [email protected] | Racing | 0 | September 13th 08 12:06 AM |
Latest on Lance and the UCI. Lance is clean. | RS | Techniques | 0 | June 1st 06 12:37 AM |
Lance dumping Sheryl or Cofidis dumping Lance? Which is worse?? | crit PRO | Racing | 17 | February 28th 06 01:16 AM |