Mountain Bikers Destroying Rainforest for Cheap Thrills

http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=503460
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Mar 29, 10:58*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=503460

You should be more concerned about rain forest being eliminated for
crop and livestock use.

No mountain-bike trail ever contributed to global warming like
deforestation but then tackling real problems has never been your
forte, coward.

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44
wrote:

On Mar 29, 10:58*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=503460

You should be more concerned about rain forest being eliminated for
crop and livestock use.

No mountain-bike trail ever contributed to global warming like
deforestation but then tackling real problems has never been your
forte, coward.

What horse-pucky! Destroying rainforest and cutting down trees is
commonplace in North Vancouver ("North Shore"), among other places.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Mar 29, 6:21*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44

wrote:
On Mar 29, 10:58*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=503460

You should be more concerned about rain forest being eliminated for
crop and livestock use.

No mountain-bike trail ever contributed to global warming like
deforestation but then tackling real problems has never been your
forte, coward.

What horse-pucky! Destroying rainforest and cutting down trees is
commonplace in North Vancouver ("North Shore"), among other places.

Well, you would know about cutting down trees since you did just that
for your own selfish pleasure.

Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.

On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44
wrote:

On Mar 29, 6:21*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44

wrote:
On Mar 29, 10:58*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=503460

You should be more concerned about rain forest being eliminated for
crop and livestock use.

No mountain-bike trail ever contributed to global warming like
deforestation but then tackling real problems has never been your
forte, coward.

What horse-pucky! Destroying rainforest and cutting down trees is
commonplace in North Vancouver ("North Shore"), among other places.

Well, you would know about cutting down trees since you did just that
for your own selfish pleasure.

Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.

Cutting down live trees does.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44
wrote:
Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.

Cutting down live trees does.

In terms of total trees cut down, what percentage do you reckon were
chopped down for mountain biking purposes?

-Beej

Beej Jorgensen wrote:
Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44
wrote:
Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.
Cutting down live trees does.

In terms of total trees cut down, what percentage do you reckon were
chopped down for mountain biking purposes?

And how many were cut down for children's play forts?

--
Tom Sherman - 42.435731,-83.985007
LOCAL CACTUS EATS CYCLIST - datakoll

On Mar 30, 10:58*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44





wrote:
On Mar 29, 6:21*pm, Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 10:41:31 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44

wrote:
On Mar 29, 10:58*am, Mike Vandeman wrote:
http://forums.mtbr.com/showthread.php?t=503460

You should be more concerned about rain forest being eliminated for
crop and livestock use.

No mountain-bike trail ever contributed to global warming like
deforestation but then tackling real problems has never been your
forte, coward.

What horse-pucky! Destroying rainforest and cutting down trees is
commonplace in North Vancouver ("North Shore"), among other places.

Well, you would know about cutting down trees since you did just that
for your own selfish pleasure.

Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.

Cutting down live trees does.


Not for a trail as most trails go around trees, and the log
structures built in no way, shape or form affect climate change.

Thanks for demonstrating your complete lack of understanding our
ecosystem. No wonder you don't tackle real problems.

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 04:28:41 +0000 (UTC), Beej Jorgensen
wrote:

Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44
wrote:
Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.

Cutting down live trees does.

In terms of total trees cut down, what percentage do you reckon were
chopped down for mountain biking purposes?

Irrelevant. Even ONE is too many, for such a frivolous, immoral
purpose.

-Beej
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande

On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:28:00 -0500, Tom Sherman
wrote:

Beej Jorgensen wrote:
Mike Vandeman wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 15:36:48 -0700 (PDT), Kayak44
wrote:
Anyhow, no mountain-bike trail has had any impact on global warming,
dummy.
Cutting down live trees does.

In terms of total trees cut down, what percentage do you reckon were
chopped down for mountain biking purposes?

And how many were cut down for children's play forts?

None.
--
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

Please don't put a cell phone next to any part of your body that you are fond of!

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande