|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
On 29 Oct 2004 13:10:15 GMT, (Qui si parla
Campagnolo ) wrote: carl- Can you give us some idea of what kind of distance, grades, and elevation gains are involved in Super Jamestown, Cold Creek Canyon, Ward, Magnolia, and Flagstaff? Are they paved hairpins snaking up vast faces? BRBR Paved, hairpins, grades of 8 to 15%, lengths from 5 or so miles to about 15...elevation rise of about 5ooo feet for some. Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" Dear Peter, When I fool around with the TerraServer topo maps, here's what I estimate for the Magnolia road: http://terraserver.microsoft.com/ima...=5533&z=13&w=1 From where a rider enters the mouth of the canyon at the edge of Boulder at about 5400 feet, it's about 3.6 miles up a 3.5% grade next to the river to where you turn off at Silver Spruce at about 6062 feet to head for Magnolia. From there, the actual Magnolia road runs only 3.6 miles to where it tops out at 8400 feet. After the first steep stretch to Magnolia at 7230 feet, there's a short flatter stretch to 7413 feet, and then another steep stretch. Both steep stretches average a bit over 12% grade. I count maybe 9 curves that are arguably hairpins between Silver Spruce and where the road tops out, but that's stretching the definition of hairpins. It looks like a short, steep road, but it doesn't look like a long, challenging Alpine pass full of hairpins that's going to heat rims up dangerously. Maybe I didn't pick the best example from your list? A table of rough estimates follows. Carl Fogel total abs gain avg miles mile elev elev grade 0.0 0.0 5400 0 0.0% Canyon Boulevard 3.6 3.6 6062 662 3.5% Silver Spruce turnoff 5.4 1.8 7230 1162 12.3% Magnolia 6.0 0.6 7413 183 5.8% flatter stretch 7.2 1.2 8200 787 12.4% road tops out From the mouth of the canyon to where the road tops out: 7.2 miles 2800 foot elevation gain 7.4% average grade From Silver Spruce turnoff to where the road tops out: 3.6 miles 2138 foot elevation gain 11.2% average grade |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Ok, so back to the orginal post. If he really wants a good rim to race then
the 280 is not that rim. It's not as fast as any semi-aero rim even if it weighs twice as much, and it's less durable for the unseen bumps you get in a race. It's fine for casual riding but don't you think we should let him know the pluses and minuses? And 36 spokes on such a light rim are needed due to it's very low torsional rigidity, yet you can't use high spoke tension as the spokes will pull out of the rim holes. One of the many reasons rims like that are no longer popular or even produced. (we already discussed the heat issue which you finally admited without actually saying you were wrong). Bruce "Qui si parla Campagnolo " wrote in message ... David- So if the same energy is put into a rim weighing 3/4 as much, why would there not be a 4/3 as high rise in temperature? BRBR Obviously a higher rim temperature increases the risk of melting glue. BRBR Must be the season to wonder about things that really don't matter. Back to OP, and would GEL 280s, 36h work for race wheels...Sure they would and I wouldn't really worry about heat buildup when braking... He's not racing in the Alps, BTW... Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Bruce- Ok, so back to the orginal post. If he really wants a good rim to
race then the 280 is not that rim. BRBR That wasn't his question. He asked if the GEL 280 could be used for a infrequent race wheel on the rear, using 36 spokes. And I said yes, just like some other really light rims could and have been used. Like Fiamme yellows. It is the best choice? nope and I think he lnows that. Is it a bad choice because of 'excessive heat buildup when braking'? Nope, not the best because it is a really light rim. Bruce And 36 spokes on such a light rim are needed due to it's very low torsional rigidity, yet you can't use high spoke tension as the spokes will pull out of the rim holes BRBR garbage. I have built many fronts with rims this light and use the same tension as the right side rear...about 100 kgf. Bruce- (we already discussed the heat issue which you finally admited without actually saying you were wrong). BRBR I did???? I'll say it again, 30% hotter cuz it's 100 gram lighter?...My Aunt Matilda's mustache..... Peter Chisholm Vecchio's Bicicletteria 1833 Pearl St. Boulder, CO, 80302 (303)440-3535 http://www.vecchios.com "Ruote convenzionali costruite eccezionalmente bene" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTT-NOS 700c MA2 rims for NOS 700c Super Champion 58 rims | Bob Taylor | Marketplace | 1 | March 26th 04 03:44 PM |
lets blow up some rims | daveornee | Techniques | 1 | March 19th 04 02:02 AM |
Ghent Six Day Excursion | Ilan Vardi | Racing | 8 | November 30th 03 08:03 PM |
Damaged rims | jacques | General | 4 | November 17th 03 10:13 PM |
Rider of the Year 2003 - Most Promising Rider - Most Disapointing Rider | Kenny | Racing | 64 | October 30th 03 01:05 AM |