Cyclist at war!

On Oct 16, 6:35*pm, "WR69" wrote:

SNIP

Then trim motorcycle newsgroups from your posts, you stupid, ****ing
idiot.

Unclench your sphincter punk.

You got that right you tell him! ..... I'll bet he's even stupid enough to
ride children on the back of his "bicycle" without a helmet. It's not like
any real motorcycle rider with any common ****ing sense or born outside of
Hooterville would ever think of doing something ****ing retarded like that.

"S'mee" wrote in message
...
On Oct 16, 6:35 pm, "WR69" wrote:

SNIP

Then trim motorcycle newsgroups from your posts, you stupid, ****ing
idiot.

Unclench your sphincter punk.

What is a sphincter punk?

Btw I didn't post that remark ...it was the road glidin' moron ya dolt.


You got that right you tell him! ..... I'll bet he's even stupid enough to
ride children on the back of his "bicycle" without a helmet. It's not like
any real motorcycle rider with any common ****ing sense or born outside of
Hooterville would ever think of doing something ****ing retarded like
that.
Right?

That is correct. But just like bicyclist motorcyclest have our share
of idiots who claim "It's my right!!!". They are only partially
correct they do have the right to be idiots...just like you.
--
Keith


Judging by your attempt to respond intelligently............oh wait never
mind.


Dave

On Oct 17, 6:51*am, "WR69" wrote:
"S'mee" wrote in message

...
On Oct 16, 6:35 pm, "WR69" wrote:

SNIP

Then trim motorcycle newsgroups from your posts, you stupid, ****ing
idiot.

Unclench your sphincter punk.

What is a sphincter punk?

Btw I didn't post that remark ...it was the road glidin' moron ya dolt.

You got that right you tell him! ..... I'll bet he's even stupid enough to
ride children on the back of his "bicycle" without a helmet. It's not like
any real motorcycle rider with any common ****ing sense or born outside of
Hooterville would ever think of doing something ****ing retarded like
that.
Right?

That is correct. But just like bicyclist motorcyclest have our share
of idiots who claim "It's my right!!!". They are only partially
correct they do have the right to be idiots...just like you.
--
Keith

Judging by your attempt to respond intelligently............oh wait never
mind.

Dave

You apparently have never done a three threaded, pentagonal crosspost.
Tricky thinks they are, eat all the punctuation marks...scrambles
letters radonly. All sort of things. I once saw such an attempt change
a man into a female luchiador midget with a hook for a hand...on the
plus side she doesn't post with a LISP anymore.

On Oct 16, 8:10*pm, Tim McNamara wrote:
In article ,

*bugbear wrote:
ComandanteBanana wrote:
There's only one side you can be on, if you know what I mean.

The concept of "you're either with us or against us" does not have a
noble history.

Nice summation.

"You are either with bicycles or against bicycles" sounds like a
reasonable way to draw the lines...

By the way, where do motorcyclists stand?

On Oct 16, 10:28*pm, "Vito" wrote:
Share the road. Don't be a selfish ass.

Hard to imagine any more selfish than a group of cyclists riding 3 & 4
abreast at 12 mph on a 2-lane public highway with a 55 mph speed limit. *And
no, it's not a fantasy - I used to see it every Saturday morning. *That's
one reason "jousting" became popular.

Here in Miami Beach, a group of them was wiped out by taxi recently on
the MacArthur Causeway, and you may be inclined to question what they
were doing in that fast road, but other causeways out of the beach are
no-man's land for bicycles, and indeed it was in one of them that I
had that incident with that terrorist.

There's only one causeway out of the beach --Venetian Causeway-- and
that's not always convenient for all.

The bottom line is MAKE BIKE LANES, OR TAME TRAFFIC OR GO TO
HOLLAND.

In article ,
"WR69" wrote:

"S'mee" wrote in message

... On Oct 16, 6:35 pm, "WR69" wrote:

SNIP

Then trim motorcycle newsgroups from your posts, you stupid,
****ing idiot.

Unclench your sphincter punk.

What is a sphincter punk?

Btw I didn't post that remark ...it was the road glidin' moron ya
dolt.

S'mee isn't the dolt, since your post didn't include a quote string or
proper attribution. If you're going to participate in Usenet, learn how
to do it.

In article om,
"Vito" wrote:

"Tim McNamara" wrote
Then why do I keep meeting smarter people riding bicycles than
riding motorcycles? I think you'd need to find some way to back up
your claim.

It only seems that way to you because they think like you. People
commonly believe those more intellegent than they are stupid simply
because their higher logic is beyond them. Your demand that I "back
up" what should be obvious to even the most casual observer is an
excellent example of that.

LOL! Thanks for the irony.

KingOfTheApes wrote:
On Oct 16, 8:10 pm, Tim McNamara wrote:
In article ,

bugbear wrote:
ComandanteBanana wrote:
There's only one side you can be on, if you know what I mean.
The concept of "you're either with us or against us" does not have a
noble history.
Nice summation.

"You are either with bicycles or against bicycles" sounds like a
reasonable way to draw the lines...

By the way, where do motorcyclists stand?


Just as POTUS managed to alienate a lot of support from the middle
ground with his 'with us or against us' rhetoric, so will anyone else
who tries the same thing. I don't really care about bicycles as long as
they don't block the flow of traffic.....I'm certainly not 'with' them,
so I guess I will just have to move to the other camp and start going
out of my way to make their lives more miserable.

"KingOfTheApes" wrote

By the way, where do motorcyclists stand?

A couple of good old boys I know like to get in the back of a pick up and go
out "jousting" using a 2x4 or whatever's at hand.

On Oct 17, 1:47*pm, Tim McNamara wrote:
In article om,

*"Vito" wrote:
"Tim McNamara" wrote
Then why do I keep meeting smarter people riding bicycles than
riding motorcycles? *I think you'd need to find some way to back up
your claim.

It only seems that way to you because they think like you. People
commonly believe those more intellegent than they are stupid simply
because their higher logic is beyond them. *Your demand that I "back
up" what should be obvious to even the most casual observer is an
excellent example of that.

LOL! *Thanks for the irony.

Hey dumb****. Remember:

"I only see posts form this idiot when someone responds to him (like
you). Put him in your killfile, life is much too short to waste
telling
trolls to shut up."

You feeding the same troll's thread... now THAT'S irony.