A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The original 29"er



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 16th 05, 03:52 PM
Brian Nystrom
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The original 29"er

JD wrote:
pauly wrote:

Or these innovative builders think the larger wheels have merit. Thats the
first time I've heard the herd argument, Usually the nay-sayers site the
lack of industry support as the death nell.




Or, taller/larger riders might not like that much spoke in a wheel
because wheels flex in hard turns and longer spokes equals more flex.


Flex has very little to do with spoke length (the difference is only ~1
1/4"); it's the spoke bracing angle that affects the wheels' lateral
stiffness. 29er wheels are the same diameter as 700c wheels that have
been used successfully in cyclocross for decades. In the rear, a 29er
wheel has an improved bracing angle vs. a 'cross wheel, since MTB rear
hubs are wider than road/'cross hubs. Given the stronger (than 'cross)
rims they use, there's no reason that a 29er wheel shouldn't be very
durable. For extreme use like downhill and big drops, they're not the
best choice, but for X/C and other more typical riding, they should be fine.
Ads
  #32  
Old November 16th 05, 08:45 PM posted to alt.mountain-bike
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default The original 29"er


Brian Nystrom wrote:
JD wrote:
pauly wrote:

Or these innovative builders think the larger wheels have merit. Thats the
first time I've heard the herd argument, Usually the nay-sayers site the
lack of industry support as the death nell.




Or, taller/larger riders might not like that much spoke in a wheel
because wheels flex in hard turns and longer spokes equals more flex.


Flex has very little to do with spoke length (the difference is only ~1
1/4"); it's the spoke bracing angle that affects the wheels' lateral
stiffness. 29er wheels are the same diameter as 700c wheels that have
been used successfully in cyclocross for decades. In the rear, a 29er
wheel has an improved bracing angle vs. a 'cross wheel, since MTB rear
hubs are wider than road/'cross hubs. Given the stronger (than 'cross)
rims they use, there's no reason that a 29er wheel shouldn't be very
durable. For extreme use like downhill and big drops, they're not the
best choice, but for X/C and other more typical riding, they should be fine.



Did you miss the part where I stated "taller/larger" riders? You
quoted it. When you weigh over 200 lbs, things such as the mere 1 1/4"
make a huge difference. When was the last time you popped a spoke just
because you were turning really hard on a hardpacked trail? When you
can tell the difference in wheel builds by a few hard turns, come back
and tell us more. Cyclocross riders carry their bikes over obstacles,
mountain bikers ride over them. Enough of your apples and oranges
crap.

JD

JD

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS Classic Original Gary Fisher Aquila Hard Tail Andy Pafko Marketplace 1 May 30th 05 11:46 AM
FS: Classic Original Gary Fisher Aquila Hard Tail Andy Pafko Marketplace 0 May 25th 05 09:22 PM
FA: Original Gary Fisher Aquila Hard Tail Andy Pafko Marketplace 0 May 23rd 05 08:44 PM
FS: 1979 Raleigh Competition GS 58cm, all original, best offer Jim Marketplace 0 April 20th 05 08:42 PM
Will the real successor to the original Stingray please stand up? Werehatrack Techniques 6 March 6th 05 09:19 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.