#31
|
|||
|
|||
The original 29"er
JD wrote:
pauly wrote: Or these innovative builders think the larger wheels have merit. Thats the first time I've heard the herd argument, Usually the nay-sayers site the lack of industry support as the death nell. Or, taller/larger riders might not like that much spoke in a wheel because wheels flex in hard turns and longer spokes equals more flex. Flex has very little to do with spoke length (the difference is only ~1 1/4"); it's the spoke bracing angle that affects the wheels' lateral stiffness. 29er wheels are the same diameter as 700c wheels that have been used successfully in cyclocross for decades. In the rear, a 29er wheel has an improved bracing angle vs. a 'cross wheel, since MTB rear hubs are wider than road/'cross hubs. Given the stronger (than 'cross) rims they use, there's no reason that a 29er wheel shouldn't be very durable. For extreme use like downhill and big drops, they're not the best choice, but for X/C and other more typical riding, they should be fine. |
Ads |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
The original 29"er
Brian Nystrom wrote: JD wrote: pauly wrote: Or these innovative builders think the larger wheels have merit. Thats the first time I've heard the herd argument, Usually the nay-sayers site the lack of industry support as the death nell. Or, taller/larger riders might not like that much spoke in a wheel because wheels flex in hard turns and longer spokes equals more flex. Flex has very little to do with spoke length (the difference is only ~1 1/4"); it's the spoke bracing angle that affects the wheels' lateral stiffness. 29er wheels are the same diameter as 700c wheels that have been used successfully in cyclocross for decades. In the rear, a 29er wheel has an improved bracing angle vs. a 'cross wheel, since MTB rear hubs are wider than road/'cross hubs. Given the stronger (than 'cross) rims they use, there's no reason that a 29er wheel shouldn't be very durable. For extreme use like downhill and big drops, they're not the best choice, but for X/C and other more typical riding, they should be fine. Did you miss the part where I stated "taller/larger" riders? You quoted it. When you weigh over 200 lbs, things such as the mere 1 1/4" make a huge difference. When was the last time you popped a spoke just because you were turning really hard on a hardpacked trail? When you can tell the difference in wheel builds by a few hard turns, come back and tell us more. Cyclocross riders carry their bikes over obstacles, mountain bikers ride over them. Enough of your apples and oranges crap. JD JD |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS Classic Original Gary Fisher Aquila Hard Tail | Andy Pafko | Marketplace | 1 | May 30th 05 11:46 AM |
FS: Classic Original Gary Fisher Aquila Hard Tail | Andy Pafko | Marketplace | 0 | May 25th 05 09:22 PM |
FA: Original Gary Fisher Aquila Hard Tail | Andy Pafko | Marketplace | 0 | May 23rd 05 08:44 PM |
FS: 1979 Raleigh Competition GS 58cm, all original, best offer | Jim | Marketplace | 0 | April 20th 05 08:42 PM |
Will the real successor to the original Stingray please stand up? | Werehatrack | Techniques | 6 | March 6th 05 09:19 PM |