|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
On Feb 23, 6:51*pm, jim beam wrote:
Michael Press wrote: In article , *jim beam wrote: wrote: Pete Cresswell writes: Torque on a hub with radial spoking will cause a significant increase in spoke tension while braking. *That will not occur with cross laced spoking, even x1. I'm guessing the "small flange racing hubs" that he refers to as occasionally failing are in a whole different (lower) class of strength from the Sturmey DynoHub. Campagnolo record hubs do that. *I have examples. So... bottom line... *You wouldn't have any second thoughts about lacing 2x on a Dynohub wheel? No problem. It's not a religious issue or anything... just seems that if I'm going to have 30+ spokes left over from a box of 75 it will be more aesthetic for them to fit three of my wheels instead of one. Also, I wonder if there is some hub-diameter-related *engineering reason why Rohloff recommends 2x. That's a good reason for selecting a spoke pattern, so long as it doesn't adversely affect spoke durability, which this probably doesn't. *Just keep an eye on the spoke line into spoke nipples and, if necessary, improve that spoke line manually. how are you going to do that without introducing residual stress? Apparently jb does not understand this as well as he has professed. The answer is that the final manual stress relief will insure that the residual stress plus cyclic stress will not bring the spoke near yield. apparently, the great michael press, master of misaligned reality, either doesn't bother to read countless past postings on this subject, or he doesn't understand them if he has read them. correspondingly, i can't be bothered to re-write it all for you, save as to correcting the fundamental misconception that you seem to share with jobst - fatigue happens /well/ below yield. now, you go back to being a schmuck, and i'll go back to waiting for jobst to figure out how his advice on one subject contradicts his advice on another.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - its semantical foggery. diminshing returns. its like on what vector is the earth narrow pole facing? |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
datakoll wrote:
On Feb 23, 6:51�pm, jim beam wrote: Michael Press wrote: In article , �jim beam wrote: wrote: Pete Cresswell writes: Torque on a hub with radial spoking will cause a significant increase in spoke tension while braking. �That will not occur with cross laced spoking, even x1. I'm guessing the "small flange racing hubs" that he refers to as occasionally failing are in a whole different (lower) class of strength from the Sturmey DynoHub. Campagnolo record hubs do that. �I have examples. So... bottom line... �You wouldn't have any second thoughts about lacing 2x on a Dynohub wheel? No problem. It's not a religious issue or anything... just seems that if I'm going to have 30+ spokes left over from a box of 75 it will be more aesthetic for them to fit three of my wheels instead of one. Also, I wonder if there is some hub-diameter-related �engineering reason why Rohloff recommends 2x. That's a good reason for selecting a spoke pattern, so long as it doesn't adversely affect spoke durability, which this probably doesn't. �Just keep an eye on the spoke line into spoke nipples and, if necessary, improve that spoke line manually. how are you going to do that without introducing residual stress? Apparently jb does not understand this as well as he has professed. The answer is that the final manual stress relief will insure that the residual stress plus cyclic stress will not bring the spoke near yield. apparently, the great michael press, master of misaligned reality, either doesn't bother to read countless past postings on this subject, or he doesn't understand them if he has read them. correspondingly, i can't be bothered to re-write it all for you, save as to correcting the fundamental misconception that you seem to share with jobst - fatigue happens /well/ below yield. now, you go back to being a schmuck, and i'll go back to waiting for jobst to figure out how his advice on one subject contradicts his advice on another.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - its semantical foggery. diminshing returns. its like on what vector is the earth narrow pole facing? you're so right. but total vacuum allows misinformation and b.s. to propagate. |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methodology And Criticality?
"jim beam" wrote:
[...] correspondingly, i can't be bothered to re-write it all for you, save as to correcting the fundamental misconception that you seem to share with jobst - fatigue happens /well/ below yield.[...] Now "jim beam" is claiming that fatigue does NOT happen at stresses well below yield. That would turn the materials engineering world on its head! Of did "jim beam" actually intend to write that fatigue DOES occur well below yield stress? -- Tom Sherman - Holstein-Friesland Bovinia The weather is here, wish you were beautiful |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
On Feb 23, 7:18Â*pm, jim beam wrote:
datakoll wrote: On Feb 23, 6:51�pm, jim beam wrote: Michael Press wrote: In article , �jim beam wrote: wrote: Pete Cresswell writes: Torque on a hub with radial spoking will cause a significant increase in spoke tension while braking. �That will not occur with cross laced spoking, even x1. I'm guessing the "small flange racing hubs" that he refers to as occasionally failing are in a whole different (lower) class of strength from the Sturmey DynoHub. Campagnolo record hubs do that. �I have examples. So... bottom line... �You wouldn't have any second thoughts about lacing 2x on a Dynohub wheel? No problem. It's not a religious issue or anything... just seems that if I'm going to have 30+ spokes left over from a box of 75 it will be more aesthetic for them to fit three of my wheels instead of one. Also, I wonder if there is some hub-diameter-related �engineering reason why Rohloff recommends 2x. That's a good reason for selecting a spoke pattern, so long as it doesn't adversely affect spoke durability, which this probably doesn't. �Just keep an eye on the spoke line into spoke nipples and, if necessary, improve that spoke line manually. how are you going to do that without introducing residual stress? Apparently jb does not understand this as well as he has professed. The answer is that the final manual stress relief will insure that the residual stress plus cyclic stress will not bring the spoke near yield. apparently, the great michael press, master of misaligned reality, either doesn't bother to read countless past postings on this subject, or he doesn't understand them if he has read them. correspondingly, i can't be bothered to re-write it all for you, save as to correcting the fundamental misconception that you seem to share with jobst - fatigue happens /well/ below yield. now, you go back to being a schmuck, and i'll go back to waiting for jobst to figure out how his advice on one subject contradicts his advice on another.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - its semantical foggery. diminshing returns. its like on what vector is the earth narrow pole facing? you're so right. Â*but total vacuum allows misinformation and b.s. to propagate.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - man the pumps! |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
On Feb 22, 6:38*pm, landotter wrote:
Going rate around here is$40-50 bucks plus spokes. it was only a matter of time mk5000 "I live 5 miles as the crow flies from the San Andreas fault, here in California. We have small earthquakes every couple days or so..but most are never felt. I did however lose a home to an earthquake in 1983. The entire town was leveled..but there were only a very few injuries, and 1 death..and to this day..Im not sure it wasnt a homicide of opportunity IRRC."--gunner |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
Per landotter:
Do it yourself. It's easier than ya think. Once ya lace in the first spoke in the second run on a side--usually the d'oh kicks in. Did it. First I tried looking at an existing wheel. Spend about 2 hours thinking I'd messed up on the spoke length. Then I turned to Google for instructions from somebody who knew... The "d'oh" kicked in about 2 am the next morning. Don't forget to get your rim label aligned with the hub label for extra points! Label, this thing is supposed to have a label? -) Only loose end now is tension. Some of the spokes are clearly way more tensioned than others and I'm guessing it's just a matter of systematically tightening/loosening without losing the alignment or introducing hop. -- PeteCresswell |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
gonna work on hop first or lateral first? |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
Per datakoll:
gonna work on hop first or lateral first? There wasn't any detectable hop. I've got the lateral down to less than a millimeter and figure it's time to quit while I'm ahead. Checked them all with a tensiometer (sp?), and got each within what seems like a reasonable range when compared with 2mm shorter spokes on a couple of professionally-built Rohloff rear wheels that've been through quite a bit of punishment with no problems. -- PeteCresswell |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Length: Measurement Methology And Criticality?
On Mar 1, 5:13*pm, "(PeteCresswell)" wrote:
Per datakoll: gonna work on hop first or lateral first? There wasn't any detectable hop. I've got the lateral down to less than a millimeter and figure it's time to quit while I'm ahead. Checked them all with a tensiometer (sp?), and got each within what seems like a reasonable range when compared with 2mm shorter spokes on a couple of professionally-built Rohloff rear wheels that've been through quite a bit of punishment with no problems. -- PeteCresswell no hop? place a credit card (Citibank is popular)across the rim edge, clamp to the stand or support and roll it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
spoke length? | datakoll | Techniques | 60 | February 2nd 08 11:45 PM |
Help with spoke length? | [email protected] | Techniques | 11 | October 31st 07 02:24 PM |
Spoke length help. | president_luke | Unicycling | 11 | January 14th 07 10:27 AM |
Spoke length? | [email protected] | Techniques | 9 | December 13th 06 01:31 PM |
Some Help with Spoke Length | Mojoe | Unicycling | 4 | February 28th 04 06:41 AM |