Valverde out

Mark wrote:
Gunsberg wrote:

Valverde is starting to seem more accident prone than Tyler Hamilton,
which does not bode well for his future prospects. That's two
straight TdFs from which he has had to withdraw due to accidents.

I thought it was knee strain or tendonitis or something like that
last year.

Mark

He hit his knee on his cycle last year.

Jan

Sandy wrote:
Robert Chung a écrit :
Simon Brooke wrote:


Don't be so sure. There's Landis, Leipheimer, Rogers, Rasmussen,
Evans left. Even his own teamate, Azevedo, has climbed better than
GH in the TdF.

Why is Vuelta winner Menchov never mentioned in any contendah lists?

He's not American. You're only allowed to name Americans as contenders
on this group.


Rogers, Rasmussen, and Evans are Americans?



Blair is Bush's poodle, so by imperial adoption, yes, of course.

Rasmussen?

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:19:45 +0100, Jan wrote:
He hit his knee on his cycle last year.

Valverde is a woman?!

--
E. Dronkert

Robert Chung a écrit :
Sandy wrote:

Robert Chung a écrit :

Simon Brooke wrote:



Don't be so sure. There's Landis, Leipheimer, Rogers, Rasmussen,
Evans left. Even his own teamate, Azevedo, has climbed better than
GH in the TdF.


Why is Vuelta winner Menchov never mentioned in any contendah lists?


He's not American. You're only allowed to name Americans as contenders
on this group.


Rogers, Rasmussen, and Evans are Americans?




Blair is Bush's poodle, so by imperial adoption, yes, of course.


Rasmussen?



Gee whiz, you're picky. The empire isn't that picky. Anyway, any
winner will get adopted. Or have democracy reestablished. Or become a
guest at Guantanamo.

Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 09:19:45 +0100, Jan wrote:
He hit his knee on his cycle last year.

Valverde is a woman?!

Wouldn't that have read "SHE hit HER knee DURING HER cycle last year"?
;-)

Jan

Robert Chung wrote:
Rasmussen?

Sandy wrote:
Gee whiz, you're picky. The empire isn't that picky. Anyway, any
winner will get adopted. Or have democracy reestablished. Or become a
guest at Guantanamo.

Rasmussen would be good at hunger striking anyway.

Donald Munro wrote:
Rasmussen would be good at hunger striking anyway.

It isn't so good if you die of starvation after missing one meal...

Ewoud Dronkert wrote:
Why is Vuelta winner Menchov never mentioned in any contendah lists?

No... the winner will be some young domestic that nobody has thought
of, who gets in a (typically doomed) breakaway, after which the rest of
the peleton is delayed for 3 hrs when a train crashes in the middle of
the road, emitting toxic gases (etc).

Or maybe Boonan will accidentally win the overall while going for the
green jersey. Of course he will get the green and spotted jerseys as
well. Eyebrows will rise when it is discovered that his hematocrit has
gone from 38 to 49.99... but hell, we need a hero in the worst way...

On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:15:01 +0200, "Robert Chung"
wrote:

Simon Brooke wrote:

Don't be so sure. There's Landis, Leipheimer, Rogers, Rasmussen, Evans
left. Even his own teamate, Azevedo, has climbed better than GH in the
TdF.

Why is Vuelta winner Menchov never mentioned in any contendah lists?

He's not American. You're only allowed to name Americans as contenders
on this group.

Rogers, Rasmussen, and Evans are Americans?

Well, their native language is American I think.

JT

****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

John Forrest Tomlin son a écrit :
On Wed, 5 Jul 2006 10:15:01 +0200, "Robert Chung"
wrote:


Simon Brooke wrote:


Don't be so sure. There's Landis, Leipheimer, Rogers, Rasmussen, Evans
left. Even his own teamate, Azevedo, has climbed better than GH in the
TdF.

Why is Vuelta winner Menchov never mentioned in any contendah lists?

He's not American. You're only allowed to name Americans as contenders
on this group.

Rogers, Rasmussen, and Evans are Americans?


Well, their native language is American I think.

JT

****************************
Remove "remove" to reply
Visit http://www.jt10000.com
****************************

Did you forget a wink-wink smiley there ?