|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
As the Lab had no way to know the rider's names when they did the EPO test last year, the minutes linking the figures and the riders seems to come from....UCI ( Union Cycliste Internationale - Switzeland). According the today article (Express http://www.lexpress.fr/info/sciences...asp?ida=434551 ) Sylvia Schenk (Germany) did it as a way for better to affect Hein Verbruggen - close to Lance - (and his protege Pat McQuaid) weak on the doping fight; I gave time ago my list of the potential ennemies behind the Lance affair, so pls to the list Emma O'Reilly + Ferrari + Mike Anderson + Greg LeMond + Texan insurance company SCA + l'Equipe + Leblanc + Ex-Miss Armstrong + Filippo Simeoni + Patrice Halgand + Ludovic Turpin + the French (or Chirac, of course) include now Sylvia Schenk and the ex-USPS soigneur Ron Jongen ..... A lot of people ..... |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
Montesquiou wrote: As the Lab had no way to know the rider's names when they did the EPO test last year, the minutes linking the figures and the riders seems to come from....UCI ( Union Cycliste Internationale - Switzeland). According the today article (Express http://www.lexpress.fr/info/sciences...asp?ida=434551 ) Sylvia Schenk (Germany) did it as a way for better to affect Hein Verbruggen - close to Lance - (and his protege Pat McQuaid) weak on the doping fight; I gave time ago my list of the potential ennemies behind the Lance affair, so pls to the list Emma O'Reilly + Ferrari + Mike Anderson + Greg LeMond + Texan insurance company SCA + l'Equipe + Leblanc + Ex-Miss Armstrong + Filippo Simeoni + Patrice Halgand + Ludovic Turpin + the French (or Chirac, of course) include now Sylvia Schenk and the ex-USPS soigneur Ron Jongen ..... A lot of people ..... The more I think about this, and I'm not sure if you've followed any of the stuff, the more this really resembles the Barry Bonds situation. if you set aside Lance's goodwill from the cancer work, I think he'd be getting hit just as hard. Each has supposedly failed tests. Lance has Ferrari, Bonds had Balco. You've got LA Confidential with Lance, and this stuff :http://makeashorterlink.com/?M2B4212BB with Bonds. Canseco is equivalent to Lemond There are just a ton of paralells here, though my personal opinion is that the hard evidence is much solider against Bonds, it's still not a good scene for Lance. Bill C |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
"Bill C" wrote in message oups.com... There are just a ton of paralells here, though my personal opinion is that the hard evidence is much solider against Bonds, it's still not a good scene for Lance. It's interesting to note that even though bond's head is two sizes bigger, people still support him. It's all a conspiracy to protect the Babe, you know? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
"Bill C" wrote in message oups.com... Montesquiou wrote: As the Lab had no way to know the rider's names when they did the EPO test last year, the minutes linking the figures and the riders seems to come from....UCI ( Union Cycliste Internationale - Switzeland). According the today article (Express http://www.lexpress.fr/info/sciences...asp?ida=434551 ) Sylvia Schenk (Germany) did it as a way for better to affect Hein Verbruggen - close to Lance - (and his protege Pat McQuaid) weak on the doping fight; I gave time ago my list of the potential ennemies behind the Lance affair, so pls to the list Emma O'Reilly + Ferrari + Mike Anderson + Greg LeMond + Texan insurance company SCA + l'Equipe + Leblanc + Ex-Miss Armstrong + Filippo Simeoni + Patrice Halgand + Ludovic Turpin + the French (or Chirac, of course) include now Sylvia Schenk and the ex-USPS soigneur Ron Jongen ..... A lot of people ..... The more I think about this, and I'm not sure if you've followed any of the stuff, the more this really resembles the Barry Bonds situation. if you set aside Lance's goodwill from the cancer work, I think he'd be getting hit just as hard. Each has supposedly failed tests. Lance has Ferrari, Bonds had Balco. You've got LA Confidential with Lance, and this stuff :http://makeashorterlink.com/?M2B4212BB with Bonds. Canseco is equivalent to Lemond There are just a ton of paralells here, though my personal opinion is that the hard evidence is much solider against Bonds, it's still not a good scene for Lance. Bill C A letter from today's VeloNews: Editor: Who am I describing: Barry Bonds or Lance Armstrong? Child prodigy. World-class athlete. Late in career, had substantial improvement in already world-class performance. Breaks records long believed unbreakable. Associated with known users of performance-enhancing drugs. Associated with known providers of performance-enhancing drugs. Accused in print by associates of drug use. Has history of bad relations with the sporting press. Relies on zero positive tests as proof of innocence. Not in competition at this time. The answer is: Both of them. If you believe that only one of them is innocent or guilty, your bias is showing. Michael Giunta Simsbury, Connecticut |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
Well..
As we all know, testing in baseball is a lot more lacadasical than in cycling. Does anyone NOT agree with that? Testing in baseball was and is still a joke. The testing in cycling is a hell of a lot more in depth than just about any other sport out there today. And still, it's not as good as it could be. Tell me about the last time someone showed up at Bonds' door on a random day to ask for a **** test. If that ever did happen, I'm sure he'd tell them to **** off, and be done with it, and nothing would happen. Tom |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
B. Lafferty wrote:
A letter from today's VeloNews: Editor: Who am I describing: Barry Bonds or Lance Armstrong? Child prodigy. World-class athlete. Late in career, had substantial improvement in already world-class performance. Breaks records long believed unbreakable. Associated with known users of performance-enhancing drugs. Associated with known providers of performance-enhancing drugs. Accused in print by associates of drug use. Has history of bad relations with the sporting press. Only in foreign countries. In the US Lance gets better press than Jesus. Relies on zero positive tests as proof of innocence. Not in competition at this time. The answer is: Both of them. If you believe that only one of them is innocent or guilty, your bias is showing. Michael Giunta Simsbury, Connecticut I marvel at Mr. Giunta's powers of perceptiveness. Still, he left out a few: * Is over five feet in height. * Possesses at least one testicle. * Has at some point in his life ridden on a bike or other vehicle. * Takes drugs. Coincidence?? I think not. Thanks, Smurf |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
"Torched Smurf" wrote in message oups.com... B. Lafferty wrote: A letter from today's VeloNews: Editor: Who am I describing: Barry Bonds or Lance Armstrong? Child prodigy. World-class athlete. Late in career, had substantial improvement in already world-class performance. Breaks records long believed unbreakable. Associated with known users of performance-enhancing drugs. Associated with known providers of performance-enhancing drugs. Accused in print by associates of drug use. Has history of bad relations with the sporting press. Only in foreign countries. In the US Lance gets better press than Jesus. Relies on zero positive tests as proof of innocence. Not in competition at this time. The answer is: Both of them. If you believe that only one of them is innocent or guilty, your bias is showing. Michael Giunta Simsbury, Connecticut I marvel at Mr. Giunta's powers of perceptiveness. Still, he left out a few: * Is over five feet in height. * Possesses at least one testicle. * Has at some point in his life ridden on a bike or other vehicle. * Takes drugs. Coincidence?? I think not. Thanks, Smurf The bottom line: R.I.P. Lance Armstrong's Myth Born 25 July, 1999 Died 23 August, 2005 "I never tested positive." |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
Gosh. I'm glad you're an attorney and not a judge.
B. Lafferty wrote: "Torched Smurf" wrote in message oups.com... B. Lafferty wrote: A letter from today's VeloNews: Editor: Who am I describing: Barry Bonds or Lance Armstrong? Child prodigy. World-class athlete. Late in career, had substantial improvement in already world-class performance. Breaks records long believed unbreakable. Associated with known users of performance-enhancing drugs. Associated with known providers of performance-enhancing drugs. Accused in print by associates of drug use. Has history of bad relations with the sporting press. Only in foreign countries. In the US Lance gets better press than Jesus. Relies on zero positive tests as proof of innocence. Not in competition at this time. The answer is: Both of them. If you believe that only one of them is innocent or guilty, your bias is showing. Michael Giunta Simsbury, Connecticut I marvel at Mr. Giunta's powers of perceptiveness. Still, he left out a few: * Is over five feet in height. * Possesses at least one testicle. * Has at some point in his life ridden on a bike or other vehicle. * Takes drugs. Coincidence?? I think not. Thanks, Smurf The bottom line: R.I.P. Lance Armstrong's Myth Born 25 July, 1999 Died 23 August, 2005 "I never tested positive." |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Is Sylvia Schenk behind the Armstrong affair ?
Gary wrote:
Gosh. I'm glad you're an attorney and not a judge. I'm assuming that wouldn't automatically disqualify him being nominated for the Supreme Court one day. Steve -- Mark & Steven Bornfeld DDS http://www.dentaltwins.com Brooklyn, NY 718-258-5001 |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Real NON RBR Reaction | Rik Van Diesel | Racing | 22 | August 27th 05 02:54 PM |
140th place garners extensive media coverage. | crit PRO | Racing | 1 | March 7th 05 02:44 AM |
The word is out: It's over. | packfiller | Racing | 3 | October 15th 04 06:22 PM |
L.A. Confidential Excerpt | 'Dis Guy | Racing | 3 | October 10th 04 05:31 AM |
Doping or not? Read this: | never_doped | Racing | 0 | August 4th 03 01:46 AM |