A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » Regional Cycling » UK
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Mason Verdict ( a sober review )



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old April 18th 17, 12:08 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:

The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side.
What was the bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that wrong?

Ads
  #12  
Old April 18th 17, 12:15 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
James Wilkinson Sword[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 781
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:27:46 +0100, colwyn wrote:

http://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/duncan.../mason-verdict


She didn't see him because car's lights are WAY too bright nowadays. You don't have a chance in hell of seeing pedestrians and cyclists. Remember when there was the 55W limit on headlights? Remember when the MOT stopped them from aiming too high? Nowadays you can have as much light as you want, aimed straight into the face of the oncoming driver, and nobody cares.

--
Hello, you have reached technical support.
Please dial 1 to report an issue, 2 to report a challenge, 3 to report a problem, or 4 to report a cockup.
  #13  
Old April 18th 17, 12:34 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18/04/17 00:15, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2017 12:27:46 +0100, colwyn
wrote:

http://www.cyclinguk.org/blog/duncan.../mason-verdict


She didn't see him because car's lights are WAY too bright nowadays.
You don't have a chance in hell of seeing pedestrians and cyclists.
Remember when there was the 55W limit on headlights? Remember when the
MOT stopped them from aiming too high? Nowadays you can have as much
light as you want, aimed straight into the face of the oncoming driver,
and nobody cares.


Agree. Streetlights make it unnecessary for vehicles to emit lots of
light - or any light even. Things are more recognisable when seen in
outline.

  #14  
Old April 18th 17, 03:26 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18/04/2017 00:08, TMS320 wrote:

On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:


The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side.
What was the bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that wrong?


It depends on how quickly you get there from wherever you are
beforehand, and whether or not you accord priority to other vehicles
appropriately and in compliance with the rules. The basic rule is that
one should not cause one's vehicle to move into the path of another
vehicle if doing so will necessitate a change of speed or direction for
that other vehicle.

So you will be able to see that the answer to your question is "maybe".

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

  #15  
Old April 18th 17, 08:20 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18/04/17 03:26, JNugent wrote:
On 18/04/2017 00:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:


The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side. What was the
bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that
wrong?


It depends on how quickly you get there from wherever you are
beforehand, and whether or not you accord priority to other vehicles
appropriately and in compliance with the rules. The basic rule is
that one should not cause one's vehicle to move into the path of
another vehicle if doing so will necessitate a change of speed or
direction for that other vehicle.

So you will be able to see that the answer to your question is
"maybe".


Since I was asking in response to Peter's post I hoped he would give his
view without you butting in.
  #16  
Old April 18th 17, 11:03 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18.04.2017 11:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:

The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side.
What was the bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that wrong?

Legally, no.
However in times of reduced visibility it may be unwise. I have an
aversion to explaining that I am in the right from bed 13 of the
Intensive Care Unit.
I quite often use a "hook turn" if i need to turn right in heavy
traffic. Cross the intersection on green on the left, then stop in front
of the cars on the left of the cross road (they will have red), then
when the lights turn green go straight ahead.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
____________________o| |________________
--------------------!

|
^
|
^---
_____________________ | ________________
o| | |
| ^ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ^ |
| | |


  #17  
Old April 18th 17, 11:05 AM posted to uk.rec.cycling
Peter Keller[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,736
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18.04.2017 19:20, TMS320 wrote:
On 18/04/17 03:26, JNugent wrote:
On 18/04/2017 00:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:


The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side. What was the
bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that
wrong?


It depends on how quickly you get there from wherever you are
beforehand, and whether or not you accord priority to other vehicles
appropriately and in compliance with the rules. The basic rule is
that one should not cause one's vehicle to move into the path of
another vehicle if doing so will necessitate a change of speed or
direction for that other vehicle.

So you will be able to see that the answer to your question is
"maybe".


Since I was asking in response to Peter's post I hoped he would give his
view without you butting in.


I have above.
Sorry I can't be here 24/7
  #18  
Old April 18th 17, 04:12 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18/04/2017 08:20, TMS320 wrote:
On 18/04/17 03:26, JNugent wrote:
On 18/04/2017 00:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:


The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side. What was the
bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that
wrong?


It depends on how quickly you get there from wherever you are
beforehand, and whether or not you accord priority to other vehicles
appropriately and in compliance with the rules. The basic rule is
that one should not cause one's vehicle to move into the path of
another vehicle if doing so will necessitate a change of speed or
direction for that other vehicle.

So you will be able to see that the answer to your question is
"maybe".


Since I was asking in response to Peter's post I hoped he would give his
view without you butting in.


This is a newsgroup.

If you prefer, you may communicate with Peter by email.

---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

  #19  
Old April 18th 17, 04:23 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
jnugent
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 11,574
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18/04/2017 11:03, Peter Keller wrote:

On 18.04.2017 11:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:


The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side.
What was the bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that wrong?


Legally, no.
However in times of reduced visibility it may be unwise. I have an
aversion to explaining that I am in the right from bed 13 of the
Intensive Care Unit.
I quite often use a "hook turn" if i need to turn right in heavy
traffic. Cross the intersection on green on the left, then stop in front
of the cars on the left of the cross road (they will have red), then
when the lights turn green go straight ahead.


| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
____________________o| |________________
--------------------!

|
^
|
^---
_____________________ | ________________
o| | |
| ^ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ^ |
| | |


Peter, that would not be aggressive enough for many UK cyclists; it
would neither inconvenience nor threaten enough (other) road users to be
acceptable for them.

I think it's fair, though, to reflect on the fact that the Mason
accident didn't occur at a light-controlled crossroads. It happened in
(the upper part of) Regent Street, London W1, between Oxford Circus
(which was behind those involved) and the BBC building and All Souls
Church at Langham Place further north. [see map URL below]

It is said that the cyclist moved from the (non-existent) inside lane to
the offside between the bus-stop seen at this URL and the site of the
colleion some yards further on.

The quote is: "What we do know is that Mick moved across to the outside
lane".

There is, of course, *no* inside lane and *no* "outside lane". There is
only one lane on each side of the centre line.

Cycling UK, confused, much? That's probably the charitable way to put it.

/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sYu03LDPsc-D6tUsczoABrQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656!6m1!1e1?hl=en



---
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
http://www.avg.com

  #20  
Old April 18th 17, 07:39 PM posted to uk.rec.cycling
TMS320
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,875
Default Mason Verdict ( a sober review )

On 18/04/17 11:03, Peter Keller wrote:
On 18.04.2017 11:08, TMS320 wrote:
On 15/04/17 10:17, Peter Keller wrote:

The car hit the bicyclist on the driver's side. What was the
bicyclist doing so far away from the left side of the road?


I am often in this position when approaching a right turn. Is that
wrong?

Legally, no. However in times of reduced visibility it may be unwise.
I have an aversion to explaining that I am in the right from bed 13
of the Intensive Care Unit.


I will never suggest that blind faith is a substitute for judgement.

I quite often use a "hook turn" if i need
to turn right in heavy traffic. Cross the intersection on green on
the left, then stop in front of the cars on the left of the cross
road (they will have red), then when the lights turn green go
straight ahead.
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
____________________o| |________________
--------------------!

|
^
|
^---
_____________________ | ________________
o| | |
| ^ |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| ^ |
| | |


That is certainly a possible bail out. There are other permutations,
depending on junction layout. But to understand why he was in the
position he was is not a difficult question.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
And the verdict is..... Donald Munro Racing 3 June 30th 08 10:02 PM
Landis verdict [email protected] Racing 11 July 5th 07 03:37 AM
Rhyl verdict out Tony Raven[_2_] UK 97 July 2nd 07 09:44 AM
sober reflection on an inebriated conversation Andy Gee General 9 October 3rd 05 10:17 PM
VDB penal verdict Van Hoorebeeck Bart Racing 3 June 24th 05 02:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.