|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/2017 13:03, Bod wrote:
On 21/04/2017 12:53, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:46:23 +0100, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. ********. You can be not paying attention without using a phone at all. On the other hand, I have no difficulty calling or texting while driving. People can multitask (driving is already doing a few things at once). It's *your* attitude to using a phone at the wheel that is all too prevalent and that's why I say that drivers with phones to their ear should be jailed to help stop their use. I now put my phone into the glove box and that is where it stays whilst I am driving. I keep mine in my coat pocket and the coat on the back seat or in the boot. The phone still works via the car's Bluetooth system. --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com |
Ads |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:14:10 +0100, JNugent wrote:
On 21/04/2017 13:03, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:53, James Wilkinson Sword wrote: On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:46:23 +0100, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. ********. You can be not paying attention without using a phone at all. On the other hand, I have no difficulty calling or texting while driving. People can multitask (driving is already doing a few things at once). It's *your* attitude to using a phone at the wheel that is all too prevalent and that's why I say that drivers with phones to their ear should be jailed to help stop their use. I now put my phone into the glove box and that is where it stays whilst I am driving. I keep mine in my coat pocket and the coat on the back seat or in the boot. The phone still works via the car's Bluetooth system. Snob. I'm traditional, I just pick up the phone and answer it. Easy to drop it on the seat if there's a policeman passing. -- Two cowboys are talking over a beer, discussing various sex positions. The first cowboy says his favorite position is "the rodeo". The other cowboy asks what the position is, and how to do it. The first cowboy says, "You tell your wife to get on the bed on all fours and then do it doggy style. Once things start to get under way and she's really enjoying it, lean forward, grab her by her hair and whisper in her ear, 'Your sister likes this position too.' Then try to hang on for 8 seconds". |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:12:49 +0100, JNugent wrote:
On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Depends on the mood the pig is in. -- A sheet of sandpaper makes a cheap and effective substitute for costly maps when visiting the Sahara desert. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/2017 15:12, JNugent wrote:
On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Read what I said again "People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences" I never said it was prisonable at the moment. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 15:41:08 +0100, Bod wrote:
On 21/04/2017 15:12, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Read what I said again "People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences" I never said it was prisonable at the moment. Not causing an accident should never be a crime. -- Why is there no Disneyland China? No one's tall enough to go on the good rides. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/2017 15:41, Bod wrote:
On 21/04/2017 15:12, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Read what I said again "People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences" I never said it was prisonable at the moment. That's what you call a squirm, isn't it? |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/2017 17:17, JNugent wrote:
On 21/04/2017 15:41, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 15:12, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Read what I said again "People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences" I never said it was prisonable at the moment. That's what you call a squirm, isn't it? A squirm for simply suggesting it being made an imprisonable offence? |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/2017 17:56, Bod wrote:
On 21/04/2017 17:17, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 15:41, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 15:12, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Read what I said again "People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences" I never said it was prisonable at the moment. That's what you call a squirm, isn't it? A squirm for simply suggesting it being made an imprisonable offence? You need to hon your reading and comprehension skills. That is not what you wrote. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/2017 23:24, JNugent wrote:
On 21/04/2017 17:56, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 17:17, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 15:41, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 15:12, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:46, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 12:33, JNugent wrote: On 21/04/2017 11:00, Bod wrote: On 21/04/2017 10:57, Bod wrote: *How was this not "dangerous driving"*? Abdelyekini Olafusi was found guilty of careless driving after he ran down the woman in Clerkenwell. Olafusi clipped the back of the 41-year-old cyclist’s wheel when he turned right at traffic lights on Gray's Inn Road on May 27. The cyclist, an Italian woman, fell off her bike to the ground but Olafusi did not stop and continued to drive over her. http://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime...-a3519751.html *Correction* dangerous driving The distinction is whether driving falls below the required standard or far below the required standard. The latter is always (and rightly) hard to prove. But the driver got a 15 month ban and a significant fine (£1250 IIRC, and no mean penalty for someone whose livelihood has just been withdrawn from him). I wouldn't like to be on the paying end of his next insurance premium, either. Should he also have been fastened to a hurdle, drawn by horse to a place of execution, then hanged (almost to the point of death), emasculated, disembowelled, beheaded and quartered (chopped into four pieces)? --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. Not really, since there is no report of a charge for that. The story goes on at length about use of a mobile phone, and it may well be that he was using an ordinary hand-held phone (thereby doing so illegally), but it doesn't actually say so, which is sort of my point. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. You do know that use of a hand-held phone while driving is not punishable by a prison sentence, don't you? And that it isn't even always an offence? Read what I said again "People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences" I never said it was prisonable at the moment. That's what you call a squirm, isn't it? A squirm for simply suggesting it being made an imprisonable offence? You need to hon your reading and comprehension skills. That is not what you wrote. This is what I wrote ""People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences". Which way do *you* comprehend that sentence? |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Minicab driver who ran over cyclist whilst distracted on mobilephone spared jail
On 21/04/17 12:53, James Wilkinson Sword wrote:
On Fri, 21 Apr 2017 12:46:23 +0100, Bod wrote: It is NOT illegal to use a hands free phone whilst driving so one assumes that he was holding the phone. People with phones stuck to their ears should be made an example of with jail sentences. That'll immediately greatly reduce the incidences of these sort of accidents. ********. You can be not paying attention without using a phone at all. ....and even less attention when playing with a phone. On the other hand, I have no difficulty calling or texting while driving. You have no proof of that. People can multitask (driving is already doing a few things at once). Driving is a single task that involves performing actions in a serial fashion. It does not involve doing several things at once. People have a poor capacity to multitask and any attempt inevitably leads to resources getting consumed by context switching. And they have no proper means of setting priorities and schedules. The word is horribly over used. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Labour MP Margaret Hodge floors cyclist whilst talking on mobile phone | CJB | UK | 79 | May 8th 13 06:57 PM |
Road rage bus driver faces jail for swerving in to cyclist | Simon Mason[_4_] | UK | 59 | January 28th 12 05:20 AM |
RLJ driver gets jail sentence for killing cyclist | Simon Mason | UK | 7 | August 25th 11 09:12 AM |
Driver who killed cyclist told to expect jail. | Simon Mason[_2_] | UK | 22 | February 3rd 08 08:17 PM |
Another cyclist killed by driver using mobile (Canada) | beerwolf | Australia | 5 | May 8th 06 02:00 AM |