Cycling code of conduct

On 25/04/2015 18:50, Tarcap wrote:


"Simon Jester" wrote in message
...

On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 3:47:27 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:


See. I told you my comments were rational. You agree with them.


How is requiring dogs to wear registration plates rational?

Ignore him. He thinks he's being funny. Clearly, he isn't.


Heaven spare me from cyclists attempts at humour.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 26/04/2015 09:22, Tarcap wrote:


"Simon Jester" wrote in message
...

On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 8:18:12 PM UTC+1, Tarcap wrote:
"Simon Jester" wrote in message
...

No I don't.
I have never used Khat so I have no idea what you are seeing at the
moment.
You really should see a mental health professional or at least contact a
support group.


Here, hang on - aren't you a little premature? You've already started the
insults *before* you've lost any argument with me.

No insult intended.
We know you have substance abuse, self esteem and sexual identity issues.
No one is judging you for that.
Go snuggle with your cria and make sure you give her extra food in the
morning.

Remember the psycholist's

You still need to cite an official definition for this 'word'.

This seems to sum you up fairly nicely\;

http://definithing.com/psycholist/


Anyway, go easy with yourself, as I explained, you haven't got a complex
at all.
It's something you will have to come to terms with.
Some are born to greatness. Others, like yourself, are born to be just
cyclists.
I know it's sad, but it is also true.

Perhaps we ought to start a charity for these unfortunates? I'm sure a
cure for cycling could be found?



--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 25/04/2015 18:39, Ronnie wrote:
On 25/04/2015 18:27, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman
wrote:
On 25/04/2015 16:21, Ronnie wrote:


Glue a buttplug to the plate and shove it up its bottom?

That was my suggestion for registration plates for cyclists.


Please keep your fantasies to yourself.

He has an unhealthy interest in cyclists bottoms.


I don't use a form of transport that requires padded lycra shorts and an
assortment of pile creams.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 25/04/2015 18:39, Ronnie wrote:
On 25/04/2015 18:27, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman
wrote:
On 25/04/2015 16:21, Ronnie wrote:


Glue a buttplug to the plate and shove it up its bottom?

That was my suggestion for registration plates for cyclists.


Please keep your fantasies to yourself.

He has an unhealthy interest in cyclists bottoms.


I knew cyclists were a bit dim, but this takes the biscuit.

You suggested "Glue a buttplug to the plate and shove it up its bottom?"

And now you suggest that I have an "unhealthy interest in cyclists bottoms."

Doh!



--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 25/04/2015 18:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:05:51 +0100, Tarcap wrote:

Fairly normal behaviour for cyclist, perhaps?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...chihuahua.html


The first comment on the page says it all: "Did the bike run over the
'dog' or the 'dog' run under the bike? Was the animal on a lead or just
dashing around like a headless chicken? Too many unknowns."

I severely doubt a cyclist crashed into a dog without seeing it. I
would suggest the dog ran under the bike. A lot of dogs do that when
I'm cycling, but the owners usually say sorry and try to control the dog
before it gets too close. The above dog owner clearly did not.


Typical cyclist response.

Which one was the vehicle?

I'll give you a clue.

a) the one with the wheels.
b) the one with the paws.



--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On 26/04/2015 11:07, The Medway Handyman wrote:
On 25/04/2015 18:39, Ronnie wrote:
On 25/04/2015 18:27, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman
wrote:
On 25/04/2015 16:21, Ronnie wrote:


Glue a buttplug to the plate and shove it up its bottom?

That was my suggestion for registration plates for cyclists.


Please keep your fantasies to yourself.

He has an unhealthy interest in cyclists bottoms.


I don't use a form of transport that requires padded lycra shorts and an
assortment of pile creams.

Neither do I. I'm not into dressing up just for a cycle ride.

On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:11:58 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:

On 25/04/2015 18:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:05:51 +0100, Tarcap wrote:

Fairly normal behaviour for cyclist, perhaps?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...chihuahua.html


The first comment on the page says it all: "Did the bike run over the
'dog' or the 'dog' run under the bike? Was the animal on a lead or just
dashing around like a headless chicken? Too many unknowns."

I severely doubt a cyclist crashed into a dog without seeing it. I
would suggest the dog ran under the bike. A lot of dogs do that when
I'm cycling, but the owners usually say sorry and try to control the dog
before it gets too close. The above dog owner clearly did not.


Typical cyclist response.

Which one was the vehicle?

I'll give you a clue.

a) the one with the wheels.
b) the one with the paws.

Irrelevant. If a dog or person runs in front of your car and dies, it's not automatically your fault. Someone could very easily wait until a car was 2 feet from them and leap in front of it and there's no way it could stop.

--
They say Confucius does his crosswords with a pen.

On 26/04/2015 12:01, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2015 11:11:58 +0100, The Medway Handyman
wrote:

On 25/04/2015 18:44, Tough Guy no. 1265 wrote:
On Sat, 25 Apr 2015 12:05:51 +0100, Tarcap wrote:

Fairly normal behaviour for cyclist, perhaps?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...chihuahua.html



The first comment on the page says it all: "Did the bike run over the
'dog' or the 'dog' run under the bike? Was the animal on a lead or just
dashing around like a headless chicken? Too many unknowns."

I severely doubt a cyclist crashed into a dog without seeing it. I
would suggest the dog ran under the bike. A lot of dogs do that when
I'm cycling, but the owners usually say sorry and try to control the dog
before it gets too close. The above dog owner clearly did not.


Typical cyclist response.

Which one was the vehicle?

I'll give you a clue.

a) the one with the wheels.
b) the one with the paws.

Irrelevant. If a dog or person runs in front of your car and dies, it's
not automatically your fault. Someone could very easily wait until a
car was 2 feet from them and leap in front of it and there's no way it
could stop.

Except that the idiot cyclist had 395 acres of open space and still
managed to run over a small dog.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...

On 26/04/2015 09:22, Tarcap wrote:


"Simon Jester" wrote in message
...

On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 8:18:12 PM UTC+1, Tarcap wrote:
"Simon Jester" wrote in message
...

No I don't.
I have never used Khat so I have no idea what you are seeing at the
moment.
You really should see a mental health professional or at least contact a
support group.


Here, hang on - aren't you a little premature? You've already started the
insults *before* you've lost any argument with me.

No insult intended.
We know you have substance abuse, self esteem and sexual identity issues.
No one is judging you for that.
Go snuggle with your cria and make sure you give her extra food in the
morning.

Remember the psycholist's

You still need to cite an official definition for this 'word'.

This seems to sum you up fairly nicely\;

http://definithing.com/psycholist/


Anyway, go easy with yourself, as I explained, you haven't got a complex
at all.
It's something you will have to come to terms with.
Some are born to greatness. Others, like yourself, are born to be just
cyclists.
I know it's sad, but it is also true.

Perhaps we ought to start a charity for these unfortunates? I'm sure a
cure for cycling could be found?


But don't the sponging freeloaders already have too much money wasted on
them?

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...

On 25/04/2015 18:39, Ronnie wrote:
On 25/04/2015 18:27, Simon Jester wrote:
On Saturday, April 25, 2015 at 5:28:08 PM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman
wrote:
On 25/04/2015 16:21, Ronnie wrote:


Glue a buttplug to the plate and shove it up its bottom?

That was my suggestion for registration plates for cyclists.


Please keep your fantasies to yourself.

He has an unhealthy interest in cyclists bottoms.


I knew cyclists were a bit dim, but this takes the biscuit.

You suggested "Glue a buttplug to the plate and shove it up its bottom?"

And now you suggest that I have an "unhealthy interest in cyclists bottoms."

Doh!


Go easy on him - remember, they have very short memories (something to do
with brain capacity, I believe).