|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#411
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
Kyle Legate wrote:
Just zis Guy, you know? wrote: Like anyone would want to fly to the US! The airports are so insecure that a bunch of domestic flights were hijacked a couple of years back and flown into buildings by terrorists. After flying Munich-Toronto a number of times through Philedelphia I finally got fed up with the bull**** of flying through the states and made my Xmas visit home connecting through Milan. Not only was there far less hassle at the connecting airport but I made the fortunate discovery that Alitalia is a much better carrier than US Airways. They resort to bribery to shut the children up (US Air lets them wail the whole flight long), the meals are much more imaginative and alcohol is free on transcontinental flights. The layover in Milan was shorter than it would have been in Philly and the airport coffee cannot even be compared. Jeez, no wonder our economy is strapped. Big spenders like you ain't comin' here. Bill "how to carry on" S. |
Ads |
#412
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
"David Kerber" wrote in message ... There were no WMD to use. It was all lies. B.S. Do you *really* believe he destroyed all those weapons he had left after he used them on the Kurds and the Iranians? Dumbass - Ya, he used them on the Kurds and Iranians, therefore, being the bad guy that he is, he would have used them on us when his regime was being eviscerated. Unless, of course, he did actually comply with the UN resolutions in an attempt to get economic sanctions lifted and his $$$ supply restored. |
#413
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
"David Kerber" wrote in message ... In article , Kevan@mouse- potato.com says... On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:39:59 -0500, David Kerber from Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com wrote: Nobody said they were. But they pretty much all agreed that Saddam had WMD. The disagreement was what to do about it and when to do it. Did you fall into some cult of personality? Did politicians telling you something dissuade you from findong out the truth on your own? Why were you willing to trust a politician in a matter of life and death anyway? The *only* way I'm going to find out anything about WMD's in Saddam's control is from somebody else. I can't go over there and check the documents and dig for them myself. Dumbass - He doesn't have them. They actually complied with the UN resolutions. The problem is that their record keeping was so shoddy, they couldn't make a convincing case that the weapons were 100% destroyed. BTW, WMD is not an apt moniker for mustard gas. It's technology from World War One. |
#414
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
"Matt O'Toole" wrote in message
... Danny Callen wrote: I wish the Dems could come up with someone at least interesting. You think Bush is interesting? Matt O. Based upon the extreme hatred that most Dems have of the man, Bush must be doing something right - I mean interesting. And here I thought all libs/dems were supposed to be so 'tolerant' - can't we all just get along? Jeff |
#415
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:14:32 GMT, "Kurgan Gringioni"
wrote: Dumbass - When a government's existence is in question is when they will use WMD. That's when ours would use them right? So when Saddam's government was being vaporized, over a period of weeks (plenty of time to give the order), why didn't he use them? Answer: he didn't have them. Felching Moron, Like I said before, you must not be able to think very clearly to only understand or believe one scenario. And you have the nerve to use the term 'Dumbass' on others? Not only has it become one of the lamest things ever seen on usenet, but it seems to describe you every time you use it. Laughable. |
#416
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:57:25 -0600, Kevan Smith
wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:35:11 -0500, Lindsay from wrote: Rump ranger, I haven't made my mind up one way or the other. You on the other hand can only envision one scenario. There is far too much evidence, noise and rhetoric floating around for anyone to make any definitive statements one way or the other and be taken seriously. No, there is solid evidence that Iraq was disarmed, and then there are flaky weaselings by the Bush cabal that he hadn't. You can say that over and over, but yet you can not provide one shred of credible evidence to back up your claim. Just like Saddam. |
#417
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 21:59:50 GMT, Howard Kveck
wrote: While I don't agree with the thought that there was any real 'support' from France or Russia, what you say is essentially correct. However that would only matter in the scenario that Saddam comes through the war alive and in control of Iraq. I cannot imagine he ever thought the latter was even remotely possible. I still disagree with you on this. According to some of Saddam's cronies's they believed that France would be able to stop the US from going in. They even believed that if we went into Iraq we would never make it all the way to Baghdad. Why would they believe that? We didn't go that far last time. You are also assuming that Saddam thinks like a rational human being. |
#418
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 07:40:15 GMT, "G.T."
wrote: Pete wrote: "I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." -- John F. Kerry, Oct 9, 2002 Yes, and who bullied the CIA into providing such BS reports that pulled the wool over our Senators' and Representatives' eyes? Kerry's decision of support could only be as bad as the intelligence provided to him. So the CIA was bullied for over 10 years to continually provide the BS reports you dream about? |
#419
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
"Lindsay" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 22:14:32 GMT, "Kurgan Gringioni" wrote: Dumbass - When a government's existence is in question is when they will use WMD. That's when ours would use them right? So when Saddam's government was being vaporized, over a period of weeks (plenty of time to give the order), why didn't he use them? Answer: he didn't have them. Felching Moron, Like I said before, you must not be able to think very clearly to only understand or believe one scenario. And you have the nerve to use the term 'Dumbass' on others? Not only has it become one of the lamest things ever seen on usenet, but it seems to describe you every time you use it. Laughable. Dumbass - That scenario is the one pointed to by nearly all the evidence, whether they be testimony from scientists in his regime, his lack of use of the phantom WMD, the lack of WMD found, the testimony of higher ups in the regime or simple logic. Other scenarios: JFK was killed by aliens from outer space. It's possible isn't it? OJ Simpson was framed by Mark Fuhrman. Possible. Do you believe that OJ is guilty? or does your incredibly expansive mind embrace all scenarios? |
#420
|
|||
|
|||
Peace Themed Jerseys?
"Lindsay" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 19:57:25 -0600, Kevan Smith wrote: On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 12:35:11 -0500, Lindsay from wrote: Rump ranger, I haven't made my mind up one way or the other. You on the other hand can only envision one scenario. There is far too much evidence, noise and rhetoric floating around for anyone to make any definitive statements one way or the other and be taken seriously. No, there is solid evidence that Iraq was disarmed, and then there are flaky weaselings by the Bush cabal that he hadn't. You can say that over and over, but yet you can not provide one shred of credible evidence to back up your claim. Just like Saddam. Dumbass - A negative cannot be proven. You warmongers are such pussies. Saddam Hussein a threat to the United States. haha. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Special TdF Stage 20 US Postal Jerseys | Jack19446 | General | 8 | August 4th 03 04:25 AM |