Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto killed in suicide

On Dec 27, 3:03*pm, Eugene Holman wrote:
In article ,
*Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.

And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest

in the nude she was hot @ http://hardcore.redclouds.com/indianboobs/index5.html

http://www.searchgate.com/imran_s.html

On Dec 27, 8:25*pm, wrote:
On Dec 27, 3:03*pm, Eugene Holman wrote:

In article ,
*Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.

And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest

in the nude she was hot @http://hardcore.redclouds.com/indianboobs/index5.html

http://www.searchgate.com/imran_s.html

They took the video down in light of her assasination probably. One
can use their imagination
having seen her on television in interviews; an attractive woman. In
my view she showed very
poor political judgment even though she knew and accepted the risks to
her safety and life.



Michael Ragland

"Eugene Holman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.


And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest asset in Pakistan, and she might
have been able to restore the part of Pakistan controlled by its
government to a semblance of a democracy. This would not be in Israel's
interests, because the idea of a responsible, nuclear-armed Pakistan
would scotch any contingency plans to attack it and destroy its nukes if
such a measure seemed justified by the war on terrorism. Now Pakistan is
in a state of chaos verging on anarchy, and it his difficult to say who
is in charge of its nukes today, or who will be next week. A pre-emptive
strike to denuclearize Pakistan would be in America's, Israel's, and, of
course, India's interests, and if a couple of the airplanes carrying out
the attack "accidently on purpose" wiped out the plants enriching
uranium in Iran as well in the way in or out, nobody would regret the
unfortunate error.

Thus, whoever offed Benazir Bhutto was clearly working in Israel's
interests and may well have been paid by the wascally Jews :-)

I note the smiley, but you may not be too far from the mark.

America has used Pakistan in its "war on terrorism" which is essentially a
war conducted for the benefit of Ersatz israel.

Can't remember who it was (?Armitage) promised to "bomb Pakistan back to the
stone-age" unless they came on side with the Yanks.

wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 3:03 pm, Eugene Holman wrote:
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.

And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest asset in Pakistan, and she might
have been able to restore the part of Pakistan controlled by its
government to a semblance of a democracy. This would not be in Israel's
interests, because the idea of a responsible, nuclear-armed Pakistan
would scotch any contingency plans to attack it and destroy its nukes if
such a measure seemed justified by the war on terrorism. Now Pakistan is
in a state of chaos verging on anarchy, and it his difficult to say who
is in charge of its nukes today, or who will be next week. A pre-emptive
strike to denuclearize Pakistan would be in America's, Israel's, and, of
course, India's interests, and if a couple of the airplanes carrying out
the attack "accidently on purpose" wiped out the plants enriching
uranium in Iran as well in the way in or out, nobody would regret the
unfortunate error.

Thus, whoever offed Benazir Bhutto was clearly working in Israel's
interests and may well have been paid by the wascally Jews :-)

Regards,
Eugene Holman

There is a short time window for what you are proposing; I'm surprised
Musharref hasn't
declared Martial Law; which is probably the next thing which will
happen if chaos and
anarchy continue. How would you "denucleate" Pakistan's nuclear
weapons from the air;
wouldn't they detonate if they were loaded and hit? Hitting by
"unfornature accident" some
of Iran's uranium reactors are very deeply buried; mini nukes have
been proposed as an
option by the U.S. So there would be some fallout, however minimal if
used. In addition,
Iran might declare war on the U.S. being bogged down in several places
already. Iran,
Pakistan, Afghanistan all need regime changes or extremist elements
eliminated. What
you are talking about is "cosmetic" but important but would leave most
likely these
regimes in place and the U.S. having to deal with its own fallout.

Michael Ragland



I have absolutely no doubt the hebes are thoroughly enjoying the **** fight
going on in Pakistan.

"Sara Salzman" wrote in message
...
Eugene Holman wrote:
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.

And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest asset in Pakistan, and she might
have been able to restore the part of Pakistan controlled by its
government to a semblance of a democracy. This would not be in Israel's
interests, because the idea of a responsible, nuclear-armed Pakistan
would scotch any contingency plans to attack it and destroy its nukes if
such a measure seemed justified by the war on terrorism. Now Pakistan is
in a state of chaos verging on anarchy, and it his difficult to say who
is in charge of its nukes today, or who will be next week. A pre-emptive
strike to denuclearize Pakistan would be in America's, Israel's, and, of
course, India's interests, and if a couple of the airplanes carrying out
the attack "accidently on purpose" wiped out the plants enriching uranium
in Iran as well in the way in or out, nobody would regret the unfortunate
error.

Thus, whoever offed Benazir Bhutto was clearly working in Israel's
interests and may well have been paid by the wascally Jews :-)

Regards,
Eugene Holman
Nicely done, Eugene, but w-a-a-y too intelligent-sounding for a denier
theory.

I was expecting something more like "it's in the Protocols."

No joke. It may well be.




-Sara

wrote in message
...
On Dec 27, 3:03 pm, Eugene Holman wrote:
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.

And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest

in the nude she was hot @
http://hardcore.redclouds.com/indianboobs/index5.html

You sick *******.

In article ,
B'injamin Cr'amer wrote:

America has used Pakistan in its
^^^

Jesus Christ! It CAN be taught! It's a miracle! But,
not one word of gratitude for moi, who spent three years
teaching "Cramer" the difference between "its" and "it's".
Not nice.

Anyway, the next task is to teach him about "you're"
vs. "your". I expect it to be harder (sigh).

RJ.

In article ,
B'injamin Cr'amer wrote:

You sick *******.

"You seem to think I am a backer of these Islamic monkeys. You
couldn't be further from the truth." -- Posted by "Ben Cramer",
Source: Message-ID:

RJ.

"B'injamin Cr'amer" wrote in message
...

"Eugene Holman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.


And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest asset in Pakistan, and she might
have been able to restore the part of Pakistan controlled by its
government to a semblance of a democracy. This would not be in Israel's
interests, because the idea of a responsible, nuclear-armed Pakistan
would scotch any contingency plans to attack it and destroy its nukes if
such a measure seemed justified by the war on terrorism. Now Pakistan is
in a state of chaos verging on anarchy, and it his difficult to say who
is in charge of its nukes today, or who will be next week. A pre-emptive
strike to denuclearize Pakistan would be in America's, Israel's, and, of
course, India's interests, and if a couple of the airplanes carrying out
the attack "accidently on purpose" wiped out the plants enriching
uranium in Iran as well in the way in or out, nobody would regret the
unfortunate error.

Thus, whoever offed Benazir Bhutto was clearly working in Israel's
interests and may well have been paid by the wascally Jews :-)

I note the smiley, but you may not be too far from the mark.

America has used Pakistan in its "war on terrorism" which is essentially a
war conducted for the benefit of Ersatz israel.

Can't remember who it was (?Armitage)
Armitage Shanks? I here he's a bit ****house now days.
}:-[)
promised to "bomb Pakistan back to the stone-age" unless they came on side
with the Yanks.

"Big_Fella" wrote in message
...

"B'injamin Cr'amer" wrote in message
...

"Eugene Holman" wrote in message
...
In article ,
Sara Salzman wrote:

wrote:
Pakistani opposition leader Bhutto
killed in suicide bombing to bad
this was not marty wallace.


And the loony-tune deniers will find a way to blame it on the Jews.

I'm no loony-tune denier, but I'll have a go at it.

Benazir Bhutto was America's greatest asset in Pakistan, and she might
have been able to restore the part of Pakistan controlled by its
government to a semblance of a democracy. This would not be in Israel's
interests, because the idea of a responsible, nuclear-armed Pakistan
would scotch any contingency plans to attack it and destroy its nukes if
such a measure seemed justified by the war on terrorism. Now Pakistan is
in a state of chaos verging on anarchy, and it his difficult to say who
is in charge of its nukes today, or who will be next week. A pre-emptive
strike to denuclearize Pakistan would be in America's, Israel's, and, of
course, India's interests, and if a couple of the airplanes carrying out
the attack "accidently on purpose" wiped out the plants enriching
uranium in Iran as well in the way in or out, nobody would regret the
unfortunate error.

Thus, whoever offed Benazir Bhutto was clearly working in Israel's
interests and may well have been paid by the wascally Jews :-)

I note the smiley, but you may not be too far from the mark.

America has used Pakistan in its "war on terrorism" which is essentially
a war conducted for the benefit of Ersatz israel.

Can't remember who it was (?Armitage)
Armitage Shanks? I here he's a bit ****house now days.
}:-[)

Richard Armitage.

How's the weather over there? Been bloody hot I believe.


promised to "bomb Pakistan back to the stone-age" unless they came on
side with the Yanks.