|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEW FEES FOR BIKES ON AIRPLANES???
United Airlines, my airline of choice for the last few years, just raised the price of carrying a bike, one way, to $175. That's $350 round trip. For US travel. I have yet to see references to international travel, but assume it's the same, or worse. This is outrageous, especially considering that Southwest charges nothing...zero...zilch...nada... for carrying a standard bicycle. Other airlines are somewhere in-between. If this is an issue that could affect you (and it likely is!), please consider letting United Airlines know how you feel about it. It's not an easy process; you have to navigate through a lot of garbage on their website, but you start here. Below is the email I sent. I'll let people know if/when I get a reply. The more people who let United know about their displeasure on this matter, the more likely it is we might see the price increases rolled back. Thanks- --Mike-- ============================== Regarding: New fees for bicycles Recently United raised the one-way fee for bicycles to $175 ($350 round trip). Besides being difficult to justify when a bicycle is under the 50 pound weight limit, United does *not* charge extra for golf, archery or bowling equipment, all of which represent a challenge to deal with. I have been 2P/Premier for the past several years, and had intended to remain so for some time to come. But there are alternative carriers not charging such high fees for cyclists, some charging nothing extra whatsoever, others in the $50 range. My customers (I own a large retail bicycle shop) are talking about United's new bicycle charges frequently, and many have spoken of looking at alternatives. Why does United want to drive us away? Those flying with bikes are typically your better customers in the upper elite ranks. They represent a lot of $$$. It seems that United might want to go to some trouble attracting, rather than annoying, such customers. We're not asking for you to carry bikes for free, but rather a reasonable charge, and parity with what other non-standard baggage (such as the previously-mentioned golf, archery & bowling)is charged. Thanks for your consideration of this important issue- Mike Jacoubowsky Partner Chain Reaction Bicycles ============================ --Mike Jacoubowsky Chain Reaction Bicycles www.ChainReaction.com Redwood City & Los Altos, CA USA |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
On 2008-10-16, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote:
HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEW FEES FOR BIKES ON AIRPLANES??? United Airlines, my airline of choice for the last few years, just raised the price of carrying a bike, one way, to $175. That's $350 round trip. For US travel. I have yet to see references to international travel, but assume it's the same, or worse. This is outrageous, For what it is worth what they seem to be charging for is the oversized baggage, not just because it is a bicycle. $175 is the new fee for luggage which is more than 62 linear inches. They have still been taking my S&S-coupled bicycle at no charge, though, even when I've told them it is a bicycle. Recently United raised the one-way fee for bicycles to $175 ($350 round trip). Besides being difficult to justify when a bicycle is under the 50 pound weight limit, United does *not* charge extra for golf, archery or bowling equipment, all of which represent a challenge to deal with. Note that archery and bowling equipment is only uncharged if it is under the 62 inch size limit. I don't quite understand why golf bags are exempt, however, since the golf travel cases are always oversized. Dennis Ferguson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
On Oct 15, 11:00*pm, Dennis Ferguson wrote:
On 2008-10-16, Mike Jacoubowsky wrote: HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEW FEES FOR BIKES ON AIRPLANES??? United Airlines, my airline of choice for the last few years, just raised the price of carrying a bike, one way, to $175. That's $350 round trip. For US travel. I have yet to see references to international travel, but assume it's the same, or worse. This is outrageous, For what it is worth what they seem to be charging for is the oversized baggage, not just because it is a bicycle. *$175 is the new fee for luggage which is more than 62 linear inches. They have still been taking my S&S-coupled bicycle at no charge, though, even when I've told them it is a bicycle. Recently United raised the one-way fee for bicycles to $175 ($350 round trip). Besides being difficult to justify when a bicycle is under the 50 pound weight limit, United does *not* charge extra for golf, archery or bowling equipment, all of which represent a challenge to deal with. Note that archery and bowling equipment is only uncharged if it is under the 62 inch size limit. *I don't quite understand why golf bags are exempt, however, since the golf travel cases are always oversized. In addition to golf bags, water and snow skis, and snowboards also appear to be exempt from the 62 linear inch (L + W + H) limit without an extra charge (the 50 lb. limit does still apply). However, scuba divers, lugers, surfers, and pole vaulters are in the same situation as cyclists. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
In article ,
"Mike Jacoubowsky" wrote: HAVE YOU SEEN THE NEW FEES FOR BIKES ON AIRPLANES??? United Airlines, my airline of choice for the last few years, just raised the price of carrying a bike, one way, to $175. That's $350 round trip. For US travel. For that price, on many routes, it could be cheaper to buy a seat for your bicycle and put it in the cabin. -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
"Ryan Cousineau" wrote: For that price, on many routes, it could be cheaper to buy a seat for your bicycle and put it in the cabin. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Especially since the bicycle, ticketed as a passenger, is allowed to have some luggage at no extra charge. If the bicycle is in a wheelchair, isn't it allowed to board first, along with the caregiver? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
On Oct 16, 3:43*pm, "Leo Lichtman"
wrote: "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: * For that price, on many routes, it could be cheaper to buy a seat for your bicycle and put it in the cabin. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Especially since the bicycle, ticketed as a passenger, is allowed to have some luggage at no extra charge. *If the bicycle is in a wheelchair, isn't it allowed to board first, along with the caregiver? So, we need bikes that convert into wheelchairs. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
In article
, Brian Huntley wrote: On Oct 16, 3:43*pm, "Leo Lichtman" wrote: "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: * For that price, on many routes, it could be cheaper to buy a seat for your bicycle and put it in the cabin. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Especially since the bicycle, ticketed as a passenger, is allowed to have some luggage at no extra charge. *If the bicycle is in a wheelchair, isn't it allowed to board first, along with the caregiver? So, we need bikes that convert into wheelchairs. http://www.frankmobility.com/duetfeat.php -- Ryan Cousineau http://www.wiredcola.com/ "In other newsgroups, they killfile trolls." "In rec.bicycles.racing, we coach them." |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
On Oct 16, 2:13*pm, Phil W Lee phil(at)lee-family(dot)me(dot)uk
wrote: "Leo Lichtman" considered Thu, 16 Oct 2008 19:43:27 GMT the perfect time to write: "Ryan Cousineau" wrote: * For that price, on many routes, it could be cheaper to buy a seat for your bicycle and put it in the cabin. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Especially since the bicycle, ticketed as a passenger, is allowed to have some luggage at no extra charge. *If the bicycle is in a wheelchair, isn't it allowed to board first, along with the caregiver? I wonder how they'd handle me? My bicycle IS my wheelchair! Not that I have any intention of finding out, but it would be an interesting dilemma. Maybe there'd be a market for something that looks like a regular wheelchair but can be quickly converted into a serviceable bicycle (wheelchairs travel free). But I think I'll stick with my Bike Friday for airline trips. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
peter wrote:
In addition to golf bags, water and snow skis, and snowboards also appear to be exempt from the 62 linear inch (L + W + H) limit without an extra charge (the 50 lb. limit does still apply). However, scuba divers, lugers, surfers, and pole vaulters are in the same situation as cyclists. A woman I know had some custom "golf bags" made up that look like golf bags but that store her wind surfer somehow. I'm not into windsurfing so I don't know the details, but apparently they are essentially over-size golf bags. They've gotten away with not paying the extra baggage fees for years. At $350 r/t it's definitely time to look at alternatives that can fit into a 62 inch case like a Bike Friday or a Gaerlan gt20. The "problem" with S&S couplers is that they only work on round steel tubing as an after-market product (they did manage one aluminum tandem customer but the lugs are put on at the factory, not after-the-fact). A company like Trek could turn the airline restrictions into a marketing advantage by coming up with a program where dealers could provide reasonably priced rental bicycles (say $100/week) to Trek owners that are traveling. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
United charging $350 r/t for bicycles
On Oct 16, 9:30*pm, SMS wrote:
peter wrote: In addition to golf bags, water and snow skis, and snowboards also appear to be exempt from the 62 linear inch (L + W + H) limit without an extra charge (the 50 lb. limit does still apply). *However, scuba divers, lugers, surfers, and pole vaulters are in the same situation as cyclists. A woman I know had some custom "golf bags" made up that look like golf bags but that store her wind surfer somehow. I'm not into windsurfing so I don't know the details, but apparently they are essentially over-size golf bags. They've gotten away with not paying the extra baggage fees for years. I've thought of doing something similar for my folding kayak. It looks to me like it'll fit in one of the larger regular golf bags, so I was thinking of getting one to replace the large duffel bag that it came in originally. But I haven't flown with it recently and in the past I was never charged extra despite the dimensions being over the nominal limits (the airlines were always careful about weighing it, but never brought out a tape measure). At $350 r/t it's definitely time to look at alternatives that can fit into a 62 inch case like a Bike Friday or a Gaerlan gt20. The "problem" with S&S couplers is that they only work on round steel tubing as an after-market product (they did manage one aluminum tandem customer but the lugs are put on at the factory, not after-the-fact). It's also pretty tough to actually meet the 62" limit with 700c wheels since the wheels alone are almost 27" long and wide for 54" leaving only 8" for depth. 26" wheels are more feasible. A company like Trek could turn the airline restrictions into a marketing advantage by coming up with a program where dealers could provide reasonably priced rental bicycles (say $100/week) to Trek owners that are traveling. Why limit it to Trek owners? Seems like it'd be a good way to convince some of the renters that they like the bike enough to buy one later. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Fuji Bicycles Join Forces with Toyota-United Pro (Daily Peloton) | [email protected] | Marketplace | 0 | December 9th 06 06:58 AM |
Charging VistaLite | Mike Latondresse | Techniques | 4 | January 22nd 05 03:53 AM |
evans charging 50p for air | davep | UK | 52 | April 26th 04 11:41 PM |
rec.bicycles.racing,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.rides | BW | General | 1 | October 18th 03 04:45 PM |
rec.bicycles.racing,rec.bicycles.misc,rec.bicycles.tech,rec.bicycles.rides | BW | Rides | 1 | October 18th 03 04:45 PM |