|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
Frederick the wrote: In article , Ningi wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In article , atriage wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. -- Android Usenet Reader http://android.newsgroupstats.hk |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
In article om,
"atriage" wrote: Frederick the wrote: In article , Ningi wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In article , atriage wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. -- Old Fritz |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
In article om,
atriage wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. -- Old Fritz |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com, wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. You're just too dim to get it huh? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
In article om,
atriage wrote: On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. You're just too dim to get it huh? If that were the case you would not debate with me. But you continue because you are not here to debate, you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout them down. -- Old Fritz |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om, atriage wrote: On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. You're just too dim to get it huh? If that were the case you would not debate with me. But you continue because you are not here to debate, you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout them down. Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean sadistic streak in me that does it. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
In article om,
atriage wrote: On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote: In article om, atriage wrote: On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. You're just too dim to get it huh? If that were the case you would not debate with me. But you continue because you are not here to debate, you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout them down. Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean sadistic streak in me that does it. Tell us more about your mean, sadistic streak. -- Michael Press |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
On 17/01/2013 21:13, Michael Press wrote:
In article om, atriage wrote: On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote: In article om, atriage wrote: On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. You're just too dim to get it huh? If that were the case you would not debate with me. But you continue because you are not here to debate, you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout them down. Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean sadistic streak in me that does it. Tell us //SLAP No last word for you faggot-boi. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
What surprise me is all the jealousy
In article om,
atriage wrote: On 17/01/2013 21:13, Michael Press wrote: In article om, atriage wrote: On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote: In article om, atriage wrote: On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote: In raweb.com, wrote: Frederick the wrote: In , wrote: On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote: In web.com, wrote: On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote: It seems to me //nobody cares Just shut the **** up moron. Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints. Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong. The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress has not been proven wrong. By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing viewpoints that you label wrong. What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible. You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints. Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe. You make my case for me, bullyboy. You're just too dim to get it huh? If that were the case you would not debate with me. But you continue because you are not here to debate, you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout them down. Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean sadistic streak in me that does it. Tell us //SLAP No last word for you faggot-boi. That is okay. Tell us more about your mean, sadistic streak and have the last word. -- Old Fritz |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Surprise! Surprise! The driver was uninjured! | Doug[_12_] | UK | 11 | August 4th 11 05:03 AM |
wow that's a surprise | John Forrest Tomlinson | Racing | 5 | April 4th 08 02:21 AM |
Surprise surprise, the ABD and its lies are behind the anti road-pricing petition. | [email protected] | UK | 86 | January 28th 07 02:47 PM |
Surprise, Surprise!! Another wheel question to ponder. | Eric | Techniques | 4 | October 14th 04 12:02 AM |
Surprise, Surprise!! Another wheel question to ponder. | Eric | Techniques | 0 | October 13th 04 03:20 AM |