#11
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
John B. wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 23:17:02 -0700 (PDT), Dan O wrote: On Sunday, May 11, 2014 10:41:17 AM UTC-7, Dan O wrote: On Friday, May 9, 2014 4:25:38 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: snip http://www.channel3000.com/news/bicy...ident/25893480 Hmm... Shaina doesn't say she witnessed the crash - just that it's out in front of her apartment. More comments: "we saw it happen. no red light at that intersection, no cones warning cyclists of the giant crack in the road" Still not definitive, but "giant crack" sounds more like a fork breaker than a front wheel grabber. Is the implication here that a bicyclist requires some sort of notice about road conditions? After all, a "construction zone" is sort of under construction and one might expect somewhat less then pristine road conditions. -- Cheers, Sometime the whole city is a construction zone. Two cyclists in recent weeks hit by flatbread trucks used to transport cranes. Two separate incidents. One dead and one critical. We have cracks in roads bad enough to take down cyclists without any construction zone. -- duane |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On 5/12/2014 5:54 AM, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 23:17:02 -0700 (PDT), Dan O wrote: On Sunday, May 11, 2014 10:41:17 AM UTC-7, Dan O wrote: On Friday, May 9, 2014 4:25:38 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: snip http://www.channel3000.com/news/bicy...ident/25893480 Hmm... Shaina doesn't say she witnessed the crash - just that it's out in front of her apartment. More comments: "we saw it happen. no red light at that intersection, no cones warning cyclists of the giant crack in the road" Still not definitive, but "giant crack" sounds more like a fork breaker than a front wheel grabber. Is the implication here that a bicyclist requires some sort of notice about road conditions? After all, a "construction zone" is sort of under construction and one might expect somewhat less then pristine road conditions. OK I'm with you generally. On to specifics. Except in 2014 E Johnson, a major one-way arterial, is pocked so badly the the orange cones start by my friend's house at 100 east and goes all the way out to 1400 east with traffic pinched to one lane. The usual pace of road repairs inches along. There are deep utility trenches, not so deep slits, piles of materials, various equipment and general obstruction beyond the cones. I wouldn't tell a cyclist where or how to ride but my choice of route is parallel on a paved street. This is a file photo not actually Johnson street: http://madisoneast.channel3000.com/n...reconstruction This shows the area: http://www.cityofmadison.com/enginee...johnsonMap.jpg -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On 5/12/2014 7:09 AM, Duane wrote:
Sometime the whole city is a construction zone. Two cyclists in recent weeks hit by flatbread trucks used to transport cranes. Two separate incidents. One dead and one critical. How did those crashes happen? -- - Frank Krygowski |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On 5/9/2014 4:25 PM, jbeattie wrote:
snip The comment by police that the broken fork caused the accident is very typical. Riders have wall impacts or catch a stick in their forks, get ejected and wake to find a broken CF fork. As a result of head injury or poor reasoning skills, they immediately conclude that the broken fork caused their fall. In the course of representing manufacturers, I have seen very few forks of any design that simply fell apart during normal use. It happens, but it is very rare. They fail a lot but it's usually a latent defect or a design issue that doesn't become apparent until the fork is stressed. So while it isn't accurate to say that the broken fork cause the crash it's probably accurate to say that the rough road caused the broken fork. He would likely have crashed even if the fork hadn't broken if the wheel got caught in a crack in the pavement. If he just hit a bump and the fork broke as a result (which is common with CF forks) then that's another story. CF doesn't require a very high force to cause a failure, and you get fatigue from relatively low forces. There's a good article about carbon fiber forks he https://web.archive.org/web/20100531033826/http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/carbonoms-fork/50-718. Unfortunately the replacement program has ended. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On Monday, May 12, 2014 11:46:33 AM UTC-4, sms wrote:
On 5/9/2014 4:25 PM, jbeattie wrote: snip The comment by police that the broken fork caused the accident is very typical. Riders have wall impacts or catch a stick in their forks, get ejected and wake to find a broken CF fork. As a result of head injury or poor reasoning skills, they immediately conclude that the broken fork caused their fall. In the course of representing manufacturers, I have seen very few forks of any design that simply fell apart during normal use. It happens, but it is very rare. They fail a lot but it's usually a latent defect or a design issue that doesn't become apparent until the fork is stressed. So while it isn't accurate to say that the broken fork cause the crash it's probably accurate to say that the rough road caused the broken fork. He would likely have crashed even if the fork hadn't broken if the wheel got caught in a crack in the pavement. If he just hit a bump and the fork broke as a result (which is common with CF forks) then that's another story. CF doesn't require a very high force to cause a failure, and you get fatigue from relatively low forces. There's a good article about carbon fiber forks he https://web.archive.org/web/20100531033826/http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/carbonoms-fork/50-718. Unfortunately the replacement program has ended. More rubbish. What planet did you come from anyway? Cheers |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On Monday, May 12, 2014 3:54:41 AM UTC-7, John B. wrote:
On Sun, 11 May 2014 23:17:02 -0700 (PDT), Dan O wrote: On Sunday, May 11, 2014 10:41:17 AM UTC-7, Dan O wrote: On Friday, May 9, 2014 4:25:38 PM UTC-7, jbeattie wrote: http://www.channel3000.com/news/bicy...ident/25893480 Hmm... Shaina doesn't say she witnessed the crash - just that it's out in front of her apartment. More comments: "we saw it happen. no red light at that intersection, no cones warning cyclists of the giant crack in the road" Still not definitive, but "giant crack" sounds more like a fork breaker than a front wheel grabber. Is the implication here that a bicyclist requires some sort of notice about road conditions? I believe that was implied by the commenter I quoted. I was not endorsing their views in any way, shape, or form - just taking clues from the eyewitness account for my little game of "best guess" CSI. The commenter actually goes on to say something like "the rider did nothing wrong except not wear a helmet" :-) (I must say I wish I had better sources of information for even the objective stuff I'm trying to glean for my little guessing game.) After all, a "construction zone" is sort of under construction and one might expect somewhat less then pristine road conditions. I said earlier, "Surely it was what the rider did that put the fork into such a predicament." As and aside, I note the usual vitriol and vehement animosity - all out of any semblance of proportion - toward bicyclists, along with ample remarks like, "the kind of biker who gives all the others a bad reputation" (which is just stupid). |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
sms wrote:
On 5/9/2014 4:25 PM, jbeattie wrote: snip The comment by police that the broken fork caused the accident is very typical. Riders have wall impacts or catch a stick in their forks, get ejected and wake to find a broken CF fork. As a result of head injury or poor reasoning skills, they immediately conclude that the broken fork caused their fall. In the course of representing manufacturers, I have seen very few forks of any design that simply fell apart during normal use. It happens, but it is very rare. They fail a lot but it's usually a latent defect or a design issue that doesn't become apparent until the fork is stressed. So while it isn't accurate to say that the broken fork cause the crash it's probably accurate to say that the rough road caused the broken fork. He would likely have crashed even if the fork hadn't broken if the wheel got caught in a crack in the pavement. If he just hit a bump and the fork broke as a result (which is common with CF forks) then that's another story. CF doesn't require a very high force to cause a failure, and you get fatigue from relatively low forces. There's a good article about carbon fiber forks he e: https://web.archive.org/web/20100531033826/http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/carbonoms-fork/50-718. Unfortunately the replacement program has ended. You stick to steel I keep using my CF ones. -- Lou |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On Monday, May 12, 2014 8:46:33 AM UTC-7, sms wrote:
On 5/9/2014 4:25 PM, jbeattie wrote: snip The comment by police that the broken fork caused the accident is very typical. Riders have wall impacts or catch a stick in their forks, get ejected and wake to find a broken CF fork. As a result of head injury or poor reasoning skills, they immediately conclude that the broken fork caused their fall. In the course of representing manufacturers, I have seen very few forks of any design that simply fell apart during normal use. It happens, but it is very rare. They fail a lot but it's usually a latent defect or a design issue that doesn't become apparent until the fork is stressed. So while it isn't accurate to say that the broken fork cause the crash it's probably accurate to say that the rough road caused the broken fork. He would likely have crashed even if the fork hadn't broken if the wheel got caught in a crack in the pavement. If he just hit a bump and the fork broke as a result (which is common with CF forks) then that's another story. CF doesn't require a very high force to cause a failure, and you get fatigue from relatively low forces. There's a good article about carbon fiber forks he https://web.archive.org/web/20100531033826/http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/carbonoms-fork/50-718. Unfortunately the replacement program has ended. So Steve, on what do you base your comment that CF forks fail "a lot." I get the sense that they don't fail a lot in Oregon, because I've only defended a couple CF fork cases, and I represent some big manufacturers state-wide. My last CF fork failure involved a dog leash getting wrapped up in the wheel (avoid MUPs). The forks were a casualty and not the cause of the fall. If there is an epidemic, it's not reached my desk. -- Jay Beattie. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On 5/12/2014 12:23 PM, jbeattie wrote:
On Monday, May 12, 2014 8:46:33 AM UTC-7, sms wrote: On 5/9/2014 4:25 PM, jbeattie wrote: snip The comment by police that the broken fork caused the accident is very typical. Riders have wall impacts or catch a stick in their forks, get ejected and wake to find a broken CF fork. As a result of head injury or poor reasoning skills, they immediately conclude that the broken fork caused their fall. In the course of representing manufacturers, I have seen very few forks of any design that simply fell apart during normal use. It happens, but it is very rare. They fail a lot but it's usually a latent defect or a design issue that doesn't become apparent until the fork is stressed. So while it isn't accurate to say that the broken fork cause the crash it's probably accurate to say that the rough road caused the broken fork. He would likely have crashed even if the fork hadn't broken if the wheel got caught in a crack in the pavement. If he just hit a bump and the fork broke as a result (which is common with CF forks) then that's another story. CF doesn't require a very high force to cause a failure, and you get fatigue from relatively low forces. There's a good article about carbon fiber forks he https://web.archive.org/web/20100531033826/http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/carbonoms-fork/50-718. Unfortunately the replacement program has ended. So Steve, on what do you base your comment that CF forks fail "a lot." I get the sense that they don't fail a lot in Oregon, because I've only defended a couple CF fork cases, and I represent some big manufacturers state-wide. My last CF fork failure involved a dog leash getting wrapped up in the wheel (avoid MUPs). The forks were a casualty and not the cause of the fall. If there is an epidemic, it's not reached my desk. -- Jay Beattie. Indeed we don't see broken carbon forks in service much, especially given their ubiquitous nature on modern bikes. Of the failures, something-in-wheel is the primary cause, accounting for virtually all cracked carbon blades: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CRASH.JPG If there's an epidemic it's well hidden. -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Physics lesson
On 5/12/2014 1:54 PM, AMuzi wrote:
On 5/12/2014 12:23 PM, jbeattie wrote: On Monday, May 12, 2014 8:46:33 AM UTC-7, sms wrote: On 5/9/2014 4:25 PM, jbeattie wrote: snip The comment by police that the broken fork caused the accident is very typical. Riders have wall impacts or catch a stick in their forks, get ejected and wake to find a broken CF fork. As a result of head injury or poor reasoning skills, they immediately conclude that the broken fork caused their fall. In the course of representing manufacturers, I have seen very few forks of any design that simply fell apart during normal use. It happens, but it is very rare. They fail a lot but it's usually a latent defect or a design issue that doesn't become apparent until the fork is stressed. So while it isn't accurate to say that the broken fork cause the crash it's probably accurate to say that the rough road caused the broken fork. He would likely have crashed even if the fork hadn't broken if the wheel got caught in a crack in the pavement. If he just hit a bump and the fork broke as a result (which is common with CF forks) then that's another story. CF doesn't require a very high force to cause a failure, and you get fatigue from relatively low forces. There's a good article about carbon fiber forks he https://web.archive.org/web/20100531033826/http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/carbonoms-fork/50-718. Unfortunately the replacement program has ended. So Steve, on what do you base your comment that CF forks fail "a lot." I get the sense that they don't fail a lot in Oregon, because I've only defended a couple CF fork cases, and I represent some big manufacturers state-wide. My last CF fork failure involved a dog leash getting wrapped up in the wheel (avoid MUPs). The forks were a casualty and not the cause of the fall. If there is an epidemic, it's not reached my desk. -- Jay Beattie. Indeed we don't see broken carbon forks in service much, especially given their ubiquitous nature on modern bikes. Of the failures, something-in-wheel is the primary cause, accounting for virtually all cracked carbon blades: http://www.yellowjersey.org/photosfromthepast/CRASH.JPG "Something in wheel" is probably the primary cause for AL forks as well wouldn't you say? If there's an epidemic it's well hidden. I keep asking where all the bodies are hidden ... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stage 9 live report physics lesson | Michael Press | Racing | 0 | July 12th 09 09:18 PM |
Lesson 1 | MagillaGorilla | Racing | 5 | January 1st 07 01:06 AM |
A lesson or two | wafflycat | UK | 8 | July 26th 05 01:25 AM |
i want to do my A2 physics coursework about the physics of a unicycle... | annaats | Unicycling | 2 | June 15th 04 10:39 PM |
A lesson from Pete (first aid) | MTB Lover | Mountain Biking | 48 | November 27th 03 01:02 PM |