|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4cz-JgbOP4
-- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+1, AMuzi wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4cz-JgbOP4 -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 I have different results. Only the SRAM chain was worse than the Connex 9sp SX I tested. Lou |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On 2018-01-25 06:00, AMuzi wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4cz-JgbOP4 1% is a bit much. I try not to go past 0.8% because then cassette damage will start. Wippermann chains are good but at least in the 7-8 speed domain I found that Sachs-Sedis chains beat them by a lot. Unfortunately those have become unobtanium. Also, from what I have seen a Wippermann 10-speed stainless chain is over $50 even while on sale. I can get two KMC chains for that. One gripe I have with such tests is that they do not properly emulate the high pulsating peak load a chain is exposed to, including phases where a clyde is standing in the pedals riding up a steep hill. Regarding grit it's not so much sand that a chain is exposed to while offroad. Rather it is wet mud flinging onto the chain and everything else, often almost for the whole ride. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 11:18:27 AM UTC-8, wrote:
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 3:00:36 PM UTC+1, AMuzi wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4cz-JgbOP4 -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 I have different results. Only the SRAM chain was worse than the Connex 9sp SX I tested. SRAM sux. Based on that review, I was going to run out and buy a Connex 11sp chain -- until I noticed it was $90 USD. What justifies that price? Chain inflation is totally out of line with other products. I just bought a replacement 105 crank for my commuter for $95 from PBK. I was using a SRAM Red crank scrapped from my broken SuperSix, but the pedal thread insert cracked through the end of the CF crank. Total POS and, of course, out of warranty. So I got a crank that cost $5 more than a Connex 11sp chain. There's a lot of sexy stuff on the market, but I end up going back to Shimano or KMC chains and generally Shimano drivetrains. I'm through with SRAM chains because they wear like Kleenex. -- Jay Beattie. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:46:39 -0800 (PST), jbeattie
wrote: SRAM sux. Based on that review, I was going to run out and buy a Connex 11sp chain -- until I noticed it was $90 USD. What justifies that price? Chain inflation is totally out of line with other products. Because profitability. Look, like many industries bike and component makers generate money by selling a small number of overpriced products to a small number of suckers. Oops, I mean customers. You know, the guys with 40 lbs of beer gut paying $5000 to save 1 lb of bike weight. Oh how I resemble that remark... |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On 2018-01-25 14:53, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:46:39 -0800 (PST), jbeattie wrote: SRAM sux. Based on that review, I was going to run out and buy a Connex 11sp chain -- until I noticed it was $90 USD. What justifies that price? Chain inflation is totally out of line with other products. Because profitability. Look, like many industries bike and component makers generate money by selling a small number of overpriced products to a small number of suckers. Oops, I mean customers. However, there are discerning customers who have blacklists. One company that made it on there now is CST. Their Conquistare road tires won't even last 1200mi in this area. The one I currently have on the rear also developed tiny cracks that you see in 15 year old car tires with 60000mi on them. Except this tire is almost new and under 1000mi. So when I have used up all CST tires here I will never buy that brand again. ... You know, the guys with 40 lbs of beer gut paying $5000 to save 1 lb of bike weight. Oh how I resemble that remark... If its any comfort I have a slight beer belly as well that won't go away no matter how much I ride. Not 40lbs though. -- Regards, Joerg http://www.analogconsultants.com/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On 1/25/2018 4:53 PM, Tim McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:46:39 -0800 (PST), jbeattie wrote: SRAM sux. Based on that review, I was going to run out and buy a Connex 11sp chain -- until I noticed it was $90 USD. What justifies that price? Chain inflation is totally out of line with other products. Because profitability. Look, like many industries bike and component makers generate money by selling a small number of overpriced products to a small number of suckers. Oops, I mean customers. You know, the guys with 40 lbs of beer gut paying $5000 to save 1 lb of bike weight. Oh how I resemble that remark... Not everyone can rock that look, considering the size 13 team gear shortage: https://firstloser.files.wordpress.c...6/fatbiker.jpg -- Andrew Muzi www.yellowjersey.org/ Open every day since 1 April, 1971 |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 13:11:33 -0800, Joerg
wrote: On 2018-01-25 06:00, AMuzi wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H4cz-JgbOP4 1% is a bit much. I try not to go past 0.8% because then cassette damage will start. Wippermann chains are good but at least in the 7-8 speed domain I found that Sachs-Sedis chains beat them by a lot. Unfortunately those have become unobtanium. Also, from what I have seen a Wippermann 10-speed stainless chain is over $50 even while on sale. I can get two KMC chains for that. One gripe I have with such tests is that they do not properly emulate the high pulsating peak load a chain is exposed to, including phases where a clyde is standing in the pedals riding up a steep hill. Regarding grit it's not so much sand that a chain is exposed to while offroad. Rather it is wet mud flinging onto the chain and everything else, often almost for the whole ride. I think that is exactly the point. The "wear test" chains all appear to be clean, aligned chains running under what appears to be an optimum tension, which is hardly the conditions that an actual bicycle chain is subjected to. While they might be considered as indicative, but certainly when adding purchase cost into the equation may well not point to the "best buy for a buck". Which is, it appears, the aim of the usual cyclist. -- Cheers, John B. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On Thursday, January 25, 2018 at 5:02:19 PM UTC-8, AMuzi wrote:
On 1/25/2018 4:53 PM, Tim McNamara wrote: On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:46:39 -0800 (PST), jbeattie wrote: SRAM sux. Based on that review, I was going to run out and buy a Connex 11sp chain -- until I noticed it was $90 USD. What justifies that price? Chain inflation is totally out of line with other products. Because profitability. Look, like many industries bike and component makers generate money by selling a small number of overpriced products to a small number of suckers. Oops, I mean customers. You know, the guys with 40 lbs of beer gut paying $5000 to save 1 lb of bike weight. Oh how I resemble that remark... Not everyone can rock that look, considering the size 13 team gear shortage: https://firstloser.files.wordpress.c...6/fatbiker.jpg Yes, but after a year of riding he'll look like Mario Cipollini! http://keyassets.timeincuk.net/inspi...Mario002pp.jpg -- Jay Beattie. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
chain wear test video
On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 16:48:47 -0800, Joerg
wrote: On 2018-01-25 14:53, Tim McNamara wrote: On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 14:46:39 -0800 (PST), jbeattie wrote: SRAM sux. Based on that review, I was going to run out and buy a Connex 11sp chain -- until I noticed it was $90 USD. What justifies that price? Chain inflation is totally out of line with other products. Because profitability. Look, like many industries bike and component makers generate money by selling a small number of overpriced products to a small number of suckers. Oops, I mean customers. However, there are discerning customers who have blacklists. One company that made it on there now is CST. Their Conquistare road tires won't even last 1200mi in this area. The one I currently have on the rear also developed tiny cracks that you see in 15 year old car tires with 60000mi on them. Except this tire is almost new and under 1000mi. So when I have used up all CST tires here I will never buy that brand again. Are those CST tires China Made? I've never seen them sold here (not that they aren't) the "cheap tires" here all seem to be local made and aren't particularly prone to cracking. ... You know, the guys with 40 lbs of beer gut paying $5000 to save 1 lb of bike weight. Oh how I resemble that remark... If its any comfort I have a slight beer belly as well that won't go away no matter how much I ride. Not 40lbs though. -- Cheers, John B. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
cog wear test? | Nate Nagel[_2_] | Techniques | 4 | October 17th 09 09:08 PM |
Cog and Chain wear | [email protected] | Techniques | 1 | July 12th 07 08:40 AM |
Is chain flex an indicator of chain wear? | Friday | Techniques | 8 | May 4th 06 01:19 AM |
Chain Wear | cirrus | Australia | 6 | January 25th 06 08:06 AM |
Chain line and chain wear... | Xyzzy | Techniques | 5 | June 25th 05 10:44 PM |