OT rant aargh!

Super Slinky wrote:

So let's just say that we have both had our say and that we aren't going
to convince each other.

Translation: I'm so far out of my depth on this one and floundering
wildly, so I'll give in, but try and make it look like we finished on
equal terms.

"bomba" wrote in message
...
Super Slinky wrote:

So let's just say that we have both had our say and that we aren't going
to convince each other.

Translation: I'm so far out of my depth on this one and floundering
wildly, so I'll give in, but try and make it look like we finished on
equal terms.

Bingo.

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:37:57 GMT, Super Slinky penned:

Actually, there are serious health issues associated with anal sex,
including a risk of anal cancer that is 40 times higher than the
heterosexual population. There are a number of illnesses carried through
fecal matter, for example typhoid fever, and the gay population has the
only known outbreaks of this now rare disease in the United States. AIDS
is much easier to spread through anal sex.


I wasn't going to post again, but here we go.

1) You don't have to be homosexual to engage in anal sex.
2) I've actually seen some studies (don't remember where, don't know how
accurate) suggesting that heteros are more likely to engage in anal sex
than gays.

Anal sex is no more the end-all be-all of homosexual sex than
reproduction is the end-all be-all of heterosexual sex.

(And if your sex consists of thrusting a few times, grunting, rolling
over and falling asleep, I feel sorry for you. Sex can be infinite in
its variety, and I think that's wonderful.)

Plenty of hetero porn focuses on anal sex, so there's some supporting
evidence that hetero males, anyway, find the practice, or at least the
idea thereof, stimulating. Does that make them mentally ill deviants?

I do wonder what you think of lesbianism. But only out of morbid
curiosity.

--
monique

Monique Y. Herman scrawled in bright red lipstick:
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:37:57 GMT, Super Slinky
penned:

Actually, there are serious health issues associated with anal sex,
including a risk of anal cancer that is 40 times higher than the
heterosexual population. There are a number of illnesses carried
through fecal matter, for example typhoid fever, and the gay
population has the only known outbreaks of this now rare disease in
the United States. AIDS is much easier to spread through anal sex.


I wasn't going to post again, but here we go.

1) You don't have to be homosexual to engage in anal sex.
2) I've actually seen some studies (don't remember where, don't know
how accurate) suggesting that heteros are more likely to engage in
anal sex than gays.

Anal sex is no more the end-all be-all of homosexual sex than
reproduction is the end-all be-all of heterosexual sex.

(And if your sex consists of thrusting a few times, grunting, rolling
over and falling asleep, I feel sorry for you. Sex can be infinite in
its variety, and I think that's wonderful.)

Plenty of hetero porn focuses on anal sex, so there's some supporting
evidence that hetero males, anyway, find the practice, or at least the
idea thereof, stimulating. Does that make them mentally ill deviants?

I do wonder what you think of lesbianism. But only out of morbid
curiosity.

I'm sure he wants to watch.

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 7:37:57 -0700, Super Slinky wrote:

Sex is a reproductive function, so at the very least homosexual
orientation results in impairment, complete dysfunction in fact, of the
reproductive function. The last I checked, the reproductive function was
one of the cornerstones of life. I guess you were asleep that day in
biology 101. Glad I could help to round out your education. Any life
form that comes into existence incapable of reproducing is an impaired
creature indeed.

You're confusing performance with potential. Both homosexuals and
heterosexuals have the ability to reproduce, but some of both choose not to
do so.


Actually, there are serious health issues associated with anal sex,
including a risk of anal cancer that is 40 times higher than the
heterosexual population. There are a number of illnesses carried through
fecal matter, for example typhoid fever, and the gay population has the
only known outbreaks of this now rare disease in the United States. AIDS
is much easier to spread through anal sex.

You're confusing sexual orientation with sexual behavior. Anal sex is not
unique to homosexuals, and likewise many homosexuals do not engage in anal
sex.


This is at odds with a number of other studies which show much higher
risk for psychological problems, including suicide attempts, bipolar
disorder and multiple disorders. See for example the Dutch NEMESIS
study.

Once again the proportions may differ for any particular psychological
disorder, but overall the incidence is the same for both.

There are no significant differences between heterosexuals and homosexuals in
emotional stability or rate of psychiatric illness (Reiss, 1980).

Homosexuals do not differ from heterosexuals on measures of psychological
health (Rothblum, Solomon, & Albee, 1986).


Even the most conservative estimates place the percentage of boys
molested at about 40% and the vast majority of the perpetrators are men.
Female child molesters often choose female victims as well. Thus, a very
high percentage of child molestations are a homosexual act, regardless
of what you consider to be orientation of the offender.

You're claiming that at least 40% of the male population has been sexually
molested? This is nonsense, unless you consider molestation to be a coach's
pat on the butt.


No conspiracy, just an illustration of how pressure group politics
works. Feel free to call the men in white uniforms to come and take me
away. That way I can live free and easy on the dole and won't have to
bother with working anymore.

I'll see what I can do. But remember that according to you homosexuals have a
higher rate of mental illness, so the men in the white uniforms will be
taking you away to a place where you will get to be with more homosexuals.


No need to discuss it further. You aren't going to dissuade me from the
self-evident truth with your circular logic anymore than I can convince
you of what you choose not to see.

You're giving me too much credit. The conclusions I've presented are not
mine, they're the conclusions of the worldwide scientific community. But in
any case, good enough.


Tlacatecatl Tlacaxipe

Shaun Rimmer said...

Shaun aRe woulda said something to him more along the lines of "You are a
stupid ****wit Super Slimy, go read up, lose your prejudices and fears.", or
summink................

I guess you aren't named Rimmer for nothing, eh Shaun?

Penny S wrote:
Monique Y. Herman scrawled in bright red lipstick:

On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:37:57 GMT, Super Slinky
penned:

Actually, there are serious health issues associated with anal sex,
including a risk of anal cancer that is 40 times higher than the
heterosexual population. There are a number of illnesses carried
through fecal matter, for example typhoid fever, and the gay
population has the only known outbreaks of this now rare disease in
the United States. AIDS is much easier to spread through anal sex.


I wasn't going to post again, but here we go.

1) You don't have to be homosexual to engage in anal sex.
2) I've actually seen some studies (don't remember where, don't know
how accurate) suggesting that heteros are more likely to engage in
anal sex than gays.

Anal sex is no more the end-all be-all of homosexual sex than
reproduction is the end-all be-all of heterosexual sex.

(And if your sex consists of thrusting a few times, grunting, rolling
over and falling asleep, I feel sorry for you. Sex can be infinite in
its variety, and I think that's wonderful.)

Plenty of hetero porn focuses on anal sex, so there's some supporting
evidence that hetero males, anyway, find the practice, or at least the
idea thereof, stimulating. Does that make them mentally ill deviants?

I do wonder what you think of lesbianism. But only out of morbid
curiosity.


I'm sure he wants to watch.

Bradumbum
(rimshot, pun intended ;-)

"spademan o---[) *" wrote in message
...

"Shaun Rimmer" wrote in message
...

Snip

Same with my Wife, Kath - she hated that her slightly younger brother
got
to
do all this cool stuff with his mates, and she didn't, or worse still,
had
to stay home and wash the dishes. Hey, she turned out great regardless,
and
certainly is not a 'soft girly' woman, if you will - Kath is Kath, and
fully
definable in no other way.

Yeah, but you still make her do all the dishes right?

It's a common misconception that whips were invented for animals.

Shaun aRe Shaun aRe

Steve.

"P e t e F a g e r l i n" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 15:05:52 +0100, "Shaun Rimmer"
wrote:

Shaun aRe woulda said something to him more along the lines of "You
are a
stupid ****wit Super Slimy, go read up, lose your prejudices and
fears.", or
summink................

Sounds like Slinky is doing a whole lotta banging on that closet door.

pete fagerlin

Well, the signs are certainly there......



Shaun aRe

"Super Slinky" wrote in message
t...
Shaun Rimmer said...

Shaun aRe woulda said something to him more along the lines of "You are
a
stupid ****wit Super Slimy, go read up, lose your prejudices and
fears.", or
summink................

I guess you aren't named Rimmer for nothing, eh Shaun?

You gonna try and lame me to death now? Heheheheheh.......



Shaun aRe