|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
I just noticed that Avid's mechanical disc brakes come with 160, 185
or 203 mm rotors. It's claimed that the 185mm rotor has 15% more "power", the 203 26% more. Does a larger rotor really provide more stopping power? Why? I could understand less fade due to heat, since a larger rotor would dissipate heat better. Does that translate into more "power"? I assume that dimension is the rotor diameter. But wouldn't a change in rotor diameter change where the caliper gets positioned, i.e. would require a change to the caliper mounting eyelets? I'm spec'ing these brakes for a road bike; should I expect to need more stopping power than a mountain bike for say long mountain downhills? TIA |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
"Michael" wrote in message om... I just noticed that Avid's mechanical disc brakes come with 160, 185 or 203 mm rotors. It's claimed that the 185mm rotor has 15% more "power", the 203 26% more. Does a larger rotor really provide more stopping power? Why? I could understand less fade due to heat, since a larger rotor would dissipate heat better. Does that translate into more "power"? I assume that dimension is the rotor diameter. But wouldn't a change in rotor diameter change where the caliper gets positioned, i.e. would require a change to the caliper mounting eyelets? I'm spec'ing these brakes for a road bike; should I expect to need more stopping power than a mountain bike for say long mountain downhills? TIA I would think the opposite. Mtn bikes "need" large brakes in order to stop NOW. Road bikes usually don't need the instant deceleration of a mtn bike. Go with the smallest rotor for the road. The mounts are adjustable in several directions, so mounting whichever diameter you choose shouldn't be a problem. FWIW, I run the small diameter Avid mechanical discs on my XC mtn bike and don't have a problem stopping. You're about to unleash a firestorm about road bikes and disc brakes. Get ready for it. Mike |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
The power of a brake is its convective heat transfer rate and proportional
to Q = UA(Th - Tc) where Q is the heat transfer rate, U the convective heat transfer coefficient, A the area and a function of rotor diameter, Th the temperature of the rotor and Tc the cooling air. I leave it as an exercise for the interested to evaluate the change in the Q per change in rotor diameter. "Michael" wrote in message om... I just noticed that Avid's mechanical disc brakes come with 160, 185 or 203 mm rotors. It's claimed that the 185mm rotor has 15% more "power", the 203 26% more. Does a larger rotor really provide more stopping power? Why? I could understand less fade due to heat, since a larger rotor would dissipate heat better. Does that translate into more "power"? I assume that dimension is the rotor diameter. But wouldn't a change in rotor diameter change where the caliper gets positioned, i.e. would require a change to the caliper mounting eyelets? I'm spec'ing these brakes for a road bike; should I expect to need more stopping power than a mountain bike for say long mountain downhills? TIA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
Doug Huffman:
The power of a brake is its convective heat transfer rate and proportional to Q = UA(Th - Tc) where Q is the heat transfer rate, U the convective heat transfer coefficient, A the area and a function of rotor diameter, Th the temperature of the rotor and Tc the cooling air. Incorrect. This is only an indication of the heat generated by the brake, not its stopping power. For each surface contact on a disk brake, the stopping torque generated with uniform pressure applied by the pad is T = (1/3) * F * mu * [(D^3 - d^3)/(D^2 - d^2)] where F is the force applied on each caliper face, mu is the coefficient of friction, and D and d are the outer and inner diameters of the rotor annulus. mu will change as heat is generated on the rotor and pad, but since it's a function of the pad material, this change can be set aside for comparative purposes. It's clear that the larger the rotor, the greater the stopping torque. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:35:18 GMT, Jose Rizal wrote:
Doug Huffman: The power of a brake is its convective heat transfer rate and proportional to Q = UA(Th - Tc) where Q is the heat transfer rate, U the convective heat transfer coefficient, A the area and a function of rotor diameter, Th the temperature of the rotor and Tc the cooling air. Incorrect. This is only an indication of the heat generated by the brake, not its stopping power. Maybe this is the bigger issue though. Since the OP wants to use disc brakes for "long mountain downhills" isn't heat going to be his biggest problem? I just took a few measurements and did a few calculations and found that even a 205mm disc rotor has only about 50% of the swept area of even a 26" MTB rim. I wonder whether a person would be more likely to have a tire blow off while using a rim brake or having the rotor warp. The only real advantage I see to using the disc brake is that it's performance won't decline as much in the wet. Hardly worth all the disadvantages IMO, especially on a road bike. Chris Bird |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
Chris B.:
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 19:35:18 GMT, Jose Rizal wrote: Doug Huffman: The power of a brake is its convective heat transfer rate and proportional to Q = UA(Th - Tc) where Q is the heat transfer rate, U the convective heat transfer coefficient, A the area and a function of rotor diameter, Th the temperature of the rotor and Tc the cooling air. Incorrect. This is only an indication of the heat generated by the brake, not its stopping power. Maybe this is the bigger issue though. Since the OP wants to use disc brakes for "long mountain downhills" isn't heat going to be his biggest problem? I just took a few measurements and did a few calculations and found that even a 205mm disc rotor has only about 50% of the swept area of even a 26" MTB rim. I wonder whether a person would be more likely to have a tire blow off while using a rim brake or having the rotor warp. Heat certainly is a factor on long _steep_ downhills, and the effectiveness of the brake will depend a lot on the pad material's ability to maintain its properties at elevated temperatures. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
Michael:
I assume that dimension is the rotor diameter. But wouldn't a change in rotor diameter change where the caliper gets positioned, i.e. would require a change to the caliper mounting eyelets? Disc brake manufacturers sell adaptors for different rotor and mounting sizes. These may even be included with the brakes when you buy them. I'm spec'ing these brakes for a road bike; should I expect to need more stopping power than a mountain bike for say long mountain downhills? Be mindful of the fork manufacturer's recommendation. The larger the rotor, the larger the stresses exerted on the caliper mounts. Suspension fork manufacturers such as Answer and Fox recommend against rotors 165mm on their non-DH-specific forks for this reason. http://groups.google.com/groups?q=g:....earthlink.net |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Disc brake rotor size
Well, from a purely mechanical point of view (pardon pun) leverage would
be one possible factor. Hold your wheel in your hands and spin it. now try stopping the spin by grabbing the spokes first near the hub, then again further out. May you have the wind at your back. And a really low gear for the hills! Chris Chris'Z Corner "The Website for the Common Bicyclist": http://www.geocities.com/czcorner |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Frame/wheel flex and disc brake problem | christophe | Mountain Biking | 1 | January 31st 04 11:52 AM |
Frame/wheel flex and disc brake problem | christophe | Mountain Biking | 0 | January 27th 04 08:13 AM |
Specialized disc brake recall | bomba | Mountain Biking | 3 | December 19th 03 01:25 AM |
disc brake question | N Grover | Mountain Biking | 16 | December 9th 03 06:43 AM |