What surprise me is all the jealousy

Frederick the wrote:
In article ,
Ningi wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article ,
atriage wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

--
Android Usenet Reader
http://android.newsgroupstats.hk

In article om,
"atriage" wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In article ,
Ningi wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article ,
atriage wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

--
Old Fritz

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.


Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

--
Old Fritz

On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

You're just too dim to get it huh?

In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

You're just too dim to get it huh?

If that were the case you would not debate with me.
But you continue because you are not here to debate,
you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that
do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout
them down.

--
Old Fritz

On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

You're just too dim to get it huh?

If that were the case you would not debate with me.
But you continue because you are not here to debate,
you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that
do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout
them down.

Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I
waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean
sadistic streak in me that does it.

In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

You're just too dim to get it huh?

If that were the case you would not debate with me.
But you continue because you are not here to debate,
you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that
do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout
them down.

Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I
waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean
sadistic streak in me that does it.

Tell us more about your mean, sadistic streak.

--
Michael Press

On 17/01/2013 21:13, Michael Press wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

You're just too dim to get it huh?

If that were the case you would not debate with me.
But you continue because you are not here to debate,
you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that
do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout
them down.

Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I
waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean
sadistic streak in me that does it.

Tell us //SLAP


No last word for you faggot-boi.

In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 17/01/2013 21:13, Michael Press wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 16/01/2013 00:08, Frederick the Great wrote:
In article om,
atriage wrote:

On 14/01/2013 01:30, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

On 13/01/2013 21:57, Frederick the Great wrote:
In raweb.com,
wrote:

Frederick the wrote:
In ,
wrote:
On 12/01/2013 05:05, Frederick the Great wrote:
In web.com,
wrote:

On 11/01/2013 18:40, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq· wrote:
It seems to me //nobody cares

Just shut the **** up moron.

Another vote for forcibly suppressing other viewpoints.


Being wrong is not a viewpoint. It's just being wrong.
The viewpoint that atriage tries to suppress
has not been proven wrong.
By implication you advocate forcibly suppressing
viewpoints that you label wrong.


What "force" would that be then? I didn't realise force could be levered via Usenet. You must have been smoking too much of the local weed, something Lance lovers are prone to these days to console themselves now that their hero has been revealed as a lying douchebag who cheated his way to fame, glory and the undying admiration of the gullible.

You dodge the matter. You want to forcibly suppress some viewpoints.

Ok, post your address and I'll come round with an axe.

You make my case for me, bullyboy.

You're just too dim to get it huh?

If that were the case you would not debate with me.
But you continue because you are not here to debate,
you are here to abuse holders of viewpoints that
do not reconcile with yours and attempt to shout
them down.

Hah, you thought you'd got the last word in this thread huh MikeyBoi? I
waited just long enough for you to raise your hopes. It's the mean
sadistic streak in me that does it.

Tell us //SLAP


No last word for you faggot-boi.

That is okay. Tell us more about your mean,
sadistic streak and have the last word.

--
Old Fritz