|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Pattern on Front Disc Hub
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 02:24:32 +0100, Clive George
wrote: On 31/07/2014 01:18, wrote: On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:00:22 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 7/29/2014 10:05 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:46:16 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 7/29/2014 6:58 PM, wrote: my vote goes to lead spokes head out. Why? COMPLIANCE i.e. to comply with the notion that the lead spokes should have their heads out? The difference in angle between head in and head out for an approximately 11 inch long spoke seems to be about 0.2% of the diameter of a 22 in circle. Is that a significant change when calculating the load on a spoke? As the angle gets closer to perpendicular to the hub, as it started doing on the drive side when numbers of gears were multiplying but widths hadn't grown, potentially yes :-) (though pedantry forces me to point out that you can't compare angles and lengths in the way you're doing - dimensionally incorrect). True but it got an answer :-) But what does "potentially" means in real life? -- Cheers, John B. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Pattern on Front Disc Hub
John B.
ANSWER ? minutiae .. ! trivializing grand ideas is trollish |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Pattern on Front Disc Hub
On Thursday, July 31, 2014 8:40:13 AM UTC-4, datakoll wrote:
trivializing grand ideas is trollish And aggrandizing trivial ideas...? - Frank Krygowski |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Pattern on Front Disc Hub
Frank, tuning has finesse.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Spoke Pattern on Front Disc Hub
On Thu, 31 Jul 2014 07:18:22 +0700, wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 11:00:22 -0400, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 7/29/2014 10:05 PM, wrote: On Tuesday, July 29, 2014 9:46:16 PM UTC-4, Frank Krygowski wrote: On 7/29/2014 6:58 PM, wrote: my vote goes to lead spokes head out. Why? COMPLIANCE i.e. to comply with the notion that the lead spokes should have their heads out? The difference in angle between head in and head out for an approximately 11 inch long spoke seems to be about 0.2% of the diameter of a 22 in circle. Is that a significant change when calculating the load on a spoke? I neglected the flange thickness, and hence also the effect of head-in vs. head-out, in my previous work: which asumed that the spoke centre-line ran from the centre-line of the flange thickness. In that the elongation due to spoke crossing was on the same order of magnitude as you indicate above, and the calculated tension in the spoke due to that amount of deviation was 8.5 kgf. Typical values for total spoke tension are 100 kgf or more. As for the original question, much depends on the mode of failure anticipated, which in turn depends not only on the orientation of the spoke heads but also on the materials used, the design and the quality of the manufactured parts, the degree of crossing, the type of loading cycles to be experienced, etcetera. Flanges that are at 90 degreees to the hub centreline will have an additional stress componenent as all the spokes will pull inward on the flange; but there is also an additional stress possible in the spoke as the head-in ones will have a bend where they pass over the edge of the flange. However, if the dominant failure mode is breakage at the nipple end then head-in vs head-out vs flange strength is all moot. As for head-in vs. head-out for leading vs. trailing there is a slight possibility that a mtbf difference exists for spoke-elbow failure, as the head-in ones may have that extra bend, and the internal strain attempting the unbend the head would thus be shared (and at the elbow itself somewhat angularly displaced); I leave the magnitude and sign of that difference as an exercise for those who tire of numbering the grains of sand on Chesil beach. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Is this spoke pattern ok? | Moepanie-Wurm | Unicycling | 2 | March 6th 08 01:22 AM |
question about radial spoke pattern | greggery peccary | General | 10 | September 12th 06 03:37 PM |
Radial Spoke pattern, what are the advantages...or not? | Grolch | Techniques | 20 | June 6th 06 04:40 PM |
Errmm...2x spoke pattern | Tosspot | UK | 4 | August 14th 05 11:10 PM |
strange spoke pattern | Francesco Devittori | Techniques | 4 | June 20th 05 10:06 PM |