A Cycling & bikes forum. CycleBanter.com

Go Back   Home » CycleBanter.com forum » rec.bicycles » Mountain Biking
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

"Mountain biker dies from fall off cliff": Evolution in Action!



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 27th 05, 04:57 PM
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default "Mountain biker dies from fall off cliff": Evolution in Action!

On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:30:59 GMT, "Is this trip REALLY necessary?"
wrote:

..Mike Vandeman wrote in
:
..
..Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical interpretations.
..It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it should
..be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done nothing but
..insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the act.
..
..Done. Later.
..
..Ikonicus
..1-202-518-1515
..415-203-1513

Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
Ads
  #2  
Old May 27th 05, 05:14 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:30:59 GMT, "Is this trip REALLY necessary?"
wrote:

.Mike Vandeman wrote in
:
.
.Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical

interpretations.
.It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it

should
.be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done nothing

but
.insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the

act.
.
.Done. Later.
.
.Ikonicus
.1-202-518-1515
.415-203-1513

Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.


As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history of
violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal details.


  #3  
Old May 27th 05, 05:30 PM
Gary S.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 16:01:23 GMT, Mike Vandeman
wrote:

On 24 May 2005 05:36:33 -0700, "ray" wrote:

.Vandeman, you're an imbecile, if were all such liars and no hopers for
.your way of thinking, why dont you just post somewhere else, where
.people actually give a flying F*** about what you think, instead of
.wasting valuable tree hugging time here. Shall I tell you why?

Because sane people also read these newsgroups.

So not only do you post here, but also sane people do?

.You and I both know, you like the attention pure and simple,

Nope. I could care less whether anyone responds or not. If you DON'T, than I win
by default: no one would be here to refute me (not that you can even when you
TRY!).

You desperately want responses, like any other Usenet troll who has no
other life. The only way you make an impact in the world is by
deliberately annoying people.

If you are ignored, you do not "win by default" except in your own
mind. But you don't care about your stated cause, you are only here to
argue with people. Just like the Monty Python sketch, except for the
being funny part.

It is impossible to refute you because you are incapable of respecting
other people and what they say, unless agreeing with you. Your
self-definition of the truth as agreement with you means that you are
completely incapable of acknowledging reality.

Thanks for demonstrating the low-life character of mountain bikers. I couldn't
have said it better myself.

Nothing gets demonstrated except how unreasonable you are.

If there were actual people who agreed with you, you would think that
possibly ONE of them would be as brave and outspoken as you are. But
they only exist in your imagination.

When you use the term "we", I am reminded of a Mark Twain saying. I am
not aware that you are a member of royalty, or that you work as an
editor for a newspaper or magazine. I am therefore forced to conclude
that you have a tapeworm.

Thank you for amusing us today.

Happy trails,
Gary (net.yogi.bear)
--
At the 51st percentile of ursine intelligence

Gary D. Schwartz, Needham, MA, USA
Please reply to: garyDOTschwartzATpoboxDOTcom
  #4  
Old May 29th 05, 05:43 AM
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Fri, 27 May 2005 16:14:25 GMT, "Mark" wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
. ..
.. On Wed, 25 May 2005 17:30:59 GMT, "Is this trip REALLY necessary?"
.. wrote:
..
.. .Mike Vandeman wrote in
.. :
.. .
.. .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
..interpretations.
.. .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
..should
.. .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done nothing
..but
.. .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
..act.
.. .
.. .Done. Later.
.. .
.. .Ikonicus
.. .1-202-518-1515
.. .415-203-1513
..
.. Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
..
..As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history of
..violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
..interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal details.

I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #5  
Old May 29th 05, 09:48 AM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


" .
. .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. :
. .
. .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
.interpretations.
. .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
.should
. .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done

nothing
.but
. .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
.act.
. .
. .Done. Later.
. .
. .Ikonicus
. .1-202-518-1515
. .415-203-1513
.
. Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
.
.As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history

of
.violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
.interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal

details.

I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.


Paranoid?

I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
you get from headers is telling in itself.


  #6  
Old May 29th 05, 03:06 PM
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark" wrote:

..
.." .
.. . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
.. . :
.. . .
.. . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
.. .interpretations.
.. . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how it
.. .should
.. . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
..nothing
.. .but
.. . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop the
.. .act.
.. . .
.. . .Done. Later.
.. . .
.. . .Ikonicus
.. . .1-202-518-1515
.. . .415-203-1513
.. .
.. . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously. MAYBE.
.. .
.. .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a history
..of
.. .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
.. .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
..details.
..
.. I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
..
..
..Paranoid?
..
..I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
..think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
..personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
..several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
..you get from headers is telling in itself.

Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #7  
Old May 29th 05, 04:46 PM
GaryG
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"

wrote:

.
." .
. . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. . :
. . .
. . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
. .interpretations.
. . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how

it
. .should
. . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
.nothing
. .but
. . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop

the
. .act.
. . .
. . .Done. Later.
. . .
. . .Ikonicus
. . .1-202-518-1515
. . .415-203-1513
. .
. . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.

MAYBE.
. .
. .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a

history
.of
. .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
. .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
.details.
.
. I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
.
.
.Paranoid?
.
.I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
.think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
.personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
.several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
.you get from headers is telling in itself.

Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.


When dealing with a normal, rational person, maybe.

When dealing with a paranoid, obsessed, angry person such as yourself, it's
a sure sign of wisdom.

GG

===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande



  #8  
Old May 29th 05, 05:35 PM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"

wrote:

.
." .
. . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. . :
. . .
. . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
. .interpretations.
. . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how

it
. .should
. . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
.nothing
. .but
. . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop

the
. .act.
. . .
. . .Done. Later.
. . .
. . .Ikonicus
. . .1-202-518-1515
. . .415-203-1513
. .
. . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.

MAYBE.
. .
. .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a

history
.of
. .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
. .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
.details.
.
. I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
.
.
.Paranoid?
.
.I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
.think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
.personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
.several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
.you get from headers is telling in itself.

Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.


On what grounds do you make this statement?

Please show, with valid data from a peer reviewed , acknowledged expert that
people who dont include their personal details posting to usenet are more
dishonest than those that do.

Or is that another of your 'truths' that cant be proven because they simply
arent true?


  #9  
Old May 29th 05, 07:21 PM
Mike Vandeman
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 29 May 2005 16:35:39 GMT, "Mark" wrote:

..
.."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
. ..
.. On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"
..wrote:
..
.. .
.. ." .
.. . . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
.. . . :
.. . . .
.. . . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
.. . .interpretations.
.. . . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or how
..it
.. . .should
.. . . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
.. .nothing
.. . .but
.. . . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting. Drop
..the
.. . .act.
.. . . .
.. . . .Done. Later.
.. . . .
.. . . .Ikonicus
.. . . .1-202-518-1515
.. . . .415-203-1513
.. . .
.. . . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.
..MAYBE.
.. . .
.. . .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a
..history
.. .of
.. . .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
.. . .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
.. .details.
.. .
.. . I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
.. .
.. .
.. .Paranoid?
.. .
.. .I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally , I
.. .think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
.. .personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
.. .several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp detail
.. .you get from headers is telling in itself.
..
.. Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.
..
..On what grounds do you make this statement?
..
..Please show, with valid data from a peer reviewed , acknowledged expert that
..people who dont include their personal details posting to usenet are more
..dishonest than those that do.
..
..Or is that another of your 'truths' that cant be proven because they simply
..arent true?

Yawn.
===
I am working on creating wildlife habitat that is off-limits to
humans ("pure habitat"). Want to help? (I spent the previous 8
years fighting auto dependence and road construction.)

http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande
  #10  
Old May 30th 05, 01:27 AM
Mark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
news
On Sun, 29 May 2005 16:35:39 GMT, "Mark"

wrote:

.
."Mike Vandeman" wrote in message
.. .
. On Sun, 29 May 2005 08:48:13 GMT, "Mark"
.wrote:
.
. .
. ." .
. . . .Mike Vandeman wrote in
. . . :
. . . .
. . . .Nature is of itself and is not limited to your hypocritical
. . .interpretations.
. . . .It is not for the likes of you to either define what it is or

how
.it
. . .should
. . . .be appreciated by anyone other than for yourself. You have done
. .nothing
. . .but
. . . .insult and degrade the very thing you claim to be protecting.

Drop
.the
. . .act.
. . . .
. . . .Done. Later.
. . . .
. . . .Ikonicus
. . . .1-202-518-1515
. . . .415-203-1513
. . .
. . . Use your real name, and maybe someone would take you seriously.
.MAYBE.
. . .
. . .As you are someone with links to a cult, namely synanon, with a
.history
. .of
. . .violent retribution against people disagreeing with them, I find it
. . .interesting you constantly ask this same question, wanting personal
. .details.
. .
. . I take it back. Stay as paranoid as you are.
. .
. .
. .Paranoid?
. .
. .I think you fail to understand the meaning of that word, personally ,

I
. .think its sensible not to give someone with obvious mental problems my
. .personal details, the fact you have in the last couple of weeks, asked
. .several people for thir names to go along with thier email and isp

detail
. .you get from headers is telling in itself.
.
. Failure to give one's real name is a sure sign of dishonesty.
.
.On what grounds do you make this statement?
.
.Please show, with valid data from a peer reviewed , acknowledged expert

that
.people who dont include their personal details posting to usenet are more
.dishonest than those that do.
.
.Or is that another of your 'truths' that cant be proven because they

simply
.arent true?

Yawn.


carry on.

I said you lacked either the intelligence or the data to argue any of the
points you try to put forward as fact, or that you have no credible
credentials to be called either an expert in the fireld of environmentalism,
every time you fail to respond with anything other than 'yawn' proves me
correct.

Ironic really, that in your own little world you feel you are being clever,
that this response will garner what you desire so much,an agressive and
frustrated response.

You lack either the intelligence or worth to get either from me.

All you do is reinforce my description of you, an unintelligent , uninformed
bigot with a hatred for mountain biking hiding behind the green flag of the
environment.



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hate Mail from ANOTHER Typical Mountain Biker Gary S. Mountain Biking 5 April 5th 05 05:51 AM
Mountain Biker Openly Admits Deliberately Speeding di Mountain Biking 0 March 26th 05 04:52 PM
Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking Stephen Baker Mountain Biking 18 July 16th 04 04:28 AM
Another Typical Mountain Biker Demonstrates Their Utter Ignorance of Basic Biology Mike Vandeman Mountain Biking 4 April 16th 04 05:56 PM
Mountain biker in coma after fall, not expected to live DanTheMantisMan Mountain Biking 1 October 7th 03 12:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2018 CycleBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.