|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Ads |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Doesn't 7 minus 1 equal 6 Lance Armstrong?
Montesquiou wrote in message
... "Diablo Scott" a écrit dans le message de news: 1125097138.73f466b4278f5e9621920d3d009ad1c5@terane ws... wrote: I know there is much debate about his initial 'win', but it is sounding more and more like the 1999 win WAS tainted after all. Dick Pound, head of WADA - the anti-doping agency, has even gone so far to say that if 1 of the 6 samples taken had EPO that would be one thing but if all 6 of the 6 taken did then there would have to be some explaining done. Do like they are talking about doing with Rafael Palmiero if they are going to do it to Raffy - put an asterisk besides his name - if in fact it is found that there is validity to the assertions of the French. SQ It wasn't 6 of 6, it was 6 of 17. Armstrong gave 17 urine samples in '99. It's valid to ask why they weren't all positive. I suspect you rever read l'Equipe, it is not ? If your answer is Yes, I did, so your French is very low If your answer is not, then read first Doesn't "l'Equipe" translate to "National Enquirer"? Oui? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Doesn't 7 minus 1 equal 6 Lance Armstrong?
"Zilla" a écrit dans le message de news: ... Montesquiou wrote in message ... "Diablo Scott" a écrit dans le message de news: 1125097138.73f466b4278f5e9621920d3d009ad1c5@terane ws... wrote: I know there is much debate about his initial 'win', but it is sounding more and more like the 1999 win WAS tainted after all. Dick Pound, head of WADA - the anti-doping agency, has even gone so far to say that if 1 of the 6 samples taken had EPO that would be one thing but if all 6 of the 6 taken did then there would have to be some explaining done. Do like they are talking about doing with Rafael Palmiero if they are going to do it to Raffy - put an asterisk besides his name - if in fact it is found that there is validity to the assertions of the French. SQ It wasn't 6 of 6, it was 6 of 17. Armstrong gave 17 urine samples in '99. It's valid to ask why they weren't all positive. I suspect you rever read l'Equipe, it is not ? If your answer is Yes, I did, so your French is very low If your answer is not, then read first Doesn't "l'Equipe" translate to "National Enquirer"? Oui? No. Nor is the l'Equipe, nor the NYT, nor others prestigious News Papers are such tabloid. It is far from to be perfect, but l'Equipe is traditional. It is indeed why the accusations are seriously considered and Lance seems to hesitate to fight against. Of course the sportmen don't like the Equipe, because he is troubling and rather violent in his accusations and some reports. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Doesn't 7 minus 1 equal 6 Lance Armstrong?
Zilla wrote:
Montesquiou wrote in message ... "Diablo Scott" a écrit dans le message de news: 1125097138.73f466b4278f5e9621920d3d009ad1c5@tera news... wrote: I know there is much debate about his initial 'win', but it is sounding more and more like the 1999 win WAS tainted after all. Dick Pound, head of WADA - the anti-doping agency, has even gone so far to say that if 1 of the 6 samples taken had EPO that would be one thing but if all 6 of the 6 taken did then there would have to be some explaining done. Do like they are talking about doing with Rafael Palmiero if they are going to do it to Raffy - put an asterisk besides his name - if in fact it is found that there is validity to the assertions of the French. SQ It wasn't 6 of 6, it was 6 of 17. Armstrong gave 17 urine samples in '99. It's valid to ask why they weren't all positive. I suspect you rever read l'Equipe, it is not ? If your answer is Yes, I did, so your French is very low If your answer is not, then read first Doesn't "l'Equipe" translate to "National Enquirer"? Oui? I thought it was french for "How they hangin'?" |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Real NON RBR Reaction | Rik Van Diesel | Racing | 22 | August 27th 05 02:54 PM |
140th place garners extensive media coverage. | crit PRO | Racing | 0 | March 6th 05 11:02 PM |
The word is out: It's over. | packfiller | Racing | 3 | October 15th 04 06:22 PM |
L.A. Confidential Excerpt | 'Dis Guy | Racing | 3 | October 10th 04 05:31 AM |
Doping or not? Read this: | never_doped | Racing | 0 | August 4th 03 01:46 AM |