|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Mountain biking is no more damaging than other forms of recreation, including hiking."
"SMS" wrote in message ... [newsgroups restored] Chris Foster wrote: SMS wrote in news:447df1d2$0$96953 : http://www.americantrails.org/resour...ngImpacts.html WOW Nice article. Pretty much contradicts what MV has been saying. All on these peer reviewed articles diwsagree with you Mike, while you have been wasting your time arguing here with us, real people are doing real Well, I hike a helluva lot more than I mountain bike, and I've got to tell you that despite the fact that mountain biking is no worse than hiking in terms of trail erosion and effect on wildlife, it really isn't pleasant to have to be constantly on the alert for bicycles. The last phrase of the sentence above says it all. Something that mountain bikers will never understand. However I accept that trail use should not be limited to hikers. Here is where SMS goes off the rails. Hiking trails are for hikers - period! I'd like to see something similar to what is done on some lakes and reservoirs with regard to powered versus non-powered water-craft. They only allow powered water-craft on alternate weekends. Maybe it's impractical for trail use, I don't know. Maybe bicycles-only on odd-weekend days, hikers only on even-weekend days, hikers and bicyclists during the week, and equestrians every February 30th. DUH! Nope, the above would never work in a million years. Try to get real why don't you? I think that it's very telling that MV has never been able to post a reference that contradicts any of the articles regarding trail impact. While he obviously doesn't like the articles from IMBA, there are plenty of others that are not from an organization that has a self-interest angle, such as the one posted above. I think the reason he posts content-free posts so often, is that he hopes that he can make up for the lack of evidence with the sheer volume of his posts. Vandeman is heavily into the impact on trails (erosion,etc.) from mountain biking. I think he is probably the expert on that subject. I am not that concerned with that particular aspect of it. I am concerned about mountain bikers being on the trails without any right to be there. Frankly, hiking trails are for hikers only regardless of other factors. It has become a philosophical issue with me. But can I win this battle. Probably not, which is why Vandeman is so valuable. He takes the mountain bikers on on their own turf. I am so far above the fray that I can only converse with other philosophers. I do not think SMS is a philosopher. I will side with Vandeman no matter how many so-called studies show contrary results to his. Why? Because Vandeman is on the side of Angels and slobs like SMS are on the side of the Devil. By the way, I take great pride in my many posts to the various newsgroups being almost entirely content free. That is for lesser minds, not for Great Ones like Myself. Regards, Ed Dolan the Great - Minnesota aka Saint Edward the Great - Order of the Perpetual Sorrows - Minnesota |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
"Mountain biking is no more damaging than other forms of recreation, including hiking." | Edward Dolan | General | 147 | July 24th 06 07:03 PM |
Science Proves Mountain Biking Is More Harmful Than Hiking | Stephen Baker | Mountain Biking | 18 | July 16th 04 04:28 AM |
Frequently Asked Questions about Mountain Biking | BB | Mountain Biking | 31 | July 4th 04 02:35 AM |
EFFECTS OF OFF-ROAD RECREATION (Including Mountain Biking) ON MULE DEER AND ELK | Mike Vandeman | Social Issues | 1 | May 5th 04 03:40 AM |
EFFECTS OF OFF-ROAD RECREATION (Including Mountain Biking) ON MULE DEER AND ELK | BB | Mountain Biking | 1 | April 27th 04 07:05 AM |