What doctors/researchers think about wearing a helmet.

James Annan wrote:

I think it's time I sent an email...


Please do. They told me they didn't intend to withdraw it for the flaws
and the authors told me that the flawed bit was a minor addendum to the
main thrust of the paper, conveniently ignoring the fact that the
erroneous bit dominates the abstract.

Tony

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 15:21:20 GMT, John Doe
wrote:

Troll.

Is there an echo in here?

--
Dave...

Get a bicycle. You will not regret it. If you live. - Mark Twain

On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 14:47:43 +0000, David Martin
wrote:

What was funny is that the fisherman thinks his wizardry is so great that he
can accuse others of his own failings without blinking an eye.

He accused someone of not publishing anything to do with helemts when that
person has been published, as a simple bit of literature searching would
have uncovered.

Everyone can see what he's doing. Except him. Mental illness is not
funny either.

--
Dave...

Get a bicycle. You will not regret it. If you live. - Mark Twain

John Doe wrote:

I will write whatever I want, tough guy wanna-be.

You'll not find many people reading it:-) You take losing to a whole new
level. I bet even uk.transport would be amused by you.

James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

James Annan wrote:

I bet even uk.transport would be amused by you.


Go on, go on, go on....... ;-)

Tony

In article , John Doe wrote:
Troll.

"You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means."

Tony Raven wrote:
James Annan wrote:


I think it's time I sent an email...


Please do. They told me they didn't intend to withdraw it for the flaws
and the authors told me that the flawed bit was a minor addendum to the
main thrust of the paper, conveniently ignoring the fact that the
erroneous bit dominates the abstract.

On reflection, I reckon it might be best to submit a brief paper myself
intended for full publication, if the system allows it (and does not
relegate it to e-correspondence). That way I get to do the writing
rather than have them repeat their mealy-mouthed evasion. Of course it
won't have any real content other than one correct sum.

James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

Troll!

LSMike wrote:

This thread has had me crying with laughter the last couple of days. I
just hope it hasn't annoyed too many of you urc'ers, and I'm sorry he
followed one of us skaters back here to disturb you all.


PS yes it has been fun. But I've had enough of it now.

James
--
If I have seen further than others, it is
by treading on the toes of giants.
http://www.ne.jp/asahi/julesandjames/home/

In article ,
(Dave Kahn) writes:

Imagine "John Doe" calling Nick Kew a troll. What a sauce! I've heard
everything now.

:-)

Well, to be fair, I had used much stronger language than is my norm.

Of course he's now spoilt that by posting the same reply to everyone
else too. This behaviour looks suspiciously like someone whose
mental capacity may have been impaired in a serious head injury.

Sad.

--
Nick Kew

In article ,
(Alan Braggins) writes:

He's almost as upminster as Mike Corley.

Is upminster close to barking? I don't know East London...

A quick google confirms my suspicion that it's beyond Barking. Heading East

Mornington Crescent.

--
Nick Kew